Re: [PATCH] Do not send a zero Content-Length for 204 and 304

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Federico Schwindt wrote: > Hi, > > In the 304 case we were already skipping it for non-zero C-L. > For 204 responses this was introduced as a side effect of 271e1c52. > > Comments? OK? > Looks OK to me. -- Guillaume Quintard _

Re: [PATCH] Do not send a zero Content-Length for 204 and 304

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Guillaume Quintard wrote: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Federico Schwindt wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In the 304 case we were already skipping it for non-zero C-L. >> For 204 responses this was introduced as a side effect of 271e1c52. >> >> Comments? OK? > > > Looks

An Official Varnish Docker Repository

Hi, we recently open sourced our Varnish Dockerfile , and would like to make it the basis for the official Docker repository for Varnish. We've already made a proposal , but it was suggested we

Re: An Official Varnish Docker Repository

Hi Eric, It's good to finally see a docker image from the community! That said, personally if the image is official I'd expect it to be done by the people running the project. Call me paranoid but I'd feel more reassured knowing it's coming from the same source. OTOH, I don't see any issues having