- "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > setup with regards to TTLs and cacheability. I'd like to be able to
> > inspect a specific cached objects TTL to see if my "set obj.ttl"
> > overrides actually work or not. What is the best way to do that?
> You should get a varnishlog entr
Hi,
We have a setup with varnish in front of a lighttpd+fastcgi combo. For some
reason or other the application doesn't send any cache control headers. Instead
of doing the sensible thing (prodding the developers to fix it in the backend)
I have taken it upon myself to fix it via VCL.
However
- "Bennett Haselton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/varnishd start
> Starting varnishd: Cannot create working directory
> 'NONE/var/varnish/sls-ce3p12'
> : No such file or directory
Try :
"mkdir /var/varnish"
check which user varnish is run under in your
he AWStats docs.
Regards
--
Denis
- Original Message -----
From: jdouglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Denis Brækhus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:53:56 AM GMT+0100 Europe/Berlin
Subject: Re: Varnish and awstats
From the varnish generated log file
74.93
From: jdouglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Is there a trick to getting awstats to work with varnish?
>
>I tried doing varnishncsa -a -w filename and then pointed awstats to this file
>but it gives me an error that the log format must be incorrect
>
>a bad format or LogFormat parameter setup does not m
http://www.emea.o3magazine.com/pastissues/issue6/
"Inside: Open Source Web Acceleration with Varnish"
Nice article on Varnish, I quote :
"Varnish is an impressive web accelleration /
reverse proxy solution. It is used on a
growing number of high-traffic production
networks around the world
From: Kamil Radziszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>How to configure varnish to cache files from website that is on anoter IP
>adress as the varnish ?
"man vcl" gives you info on the backend directive to use in your vcl config:
backend default {
set backend.host = "www.example.com";
set backen
- Florian Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A huge step would be to have even a basic facility for multiple
> > backends, like round-robin or weighted round-robin (which should
> > theoretically be the easiest models to implement as they require
> > little in the way of monitoring of the b
- Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is your point right there: You won't have "all of the above"
> any time soon. What I'm looking for is input in which 20% of the
> work gives 80% of the benefit.
A huge step would be to have even a basic facility for multiple backends, li
- Anup Shukla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> > site is cached according to Varnish default policies. You have not
> > provided a single counterexample or a single snippet of VCL that
> > could solve the problems I have, or a single snippet of VCL that you guys
> >
- Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So what is dirty caching and why use it? Think of a very unreliable
> > backend. If varnish can't reach it's backend, it will simply return
> > the last content it has (even if the content is stale). Th
- Gaute Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have come to understand that in some builds under some conditions
> varnish
> may hang or a crash. (we run 1.0.4-3el4.i386.rpm)
Hi Gaute,
I'll just say that in my experience Varnish has proven itself to be extremely
stable. We actually run 1.0
- Dingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So its feasible to run Nginx as the server/load balancer and varnish
> as the front end cache giving potentially a decent high speed/high
> capacity design.
Well, I have no experience with Nginx whatsoever, but yes, both could be
components in a high speed
- Dingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would one compare say varnich with nginx
> http://wiki.codemongers.com/Nginx
> where i see Nginx is not only a web server but a balancer for
> http/pop/imap/smtp
Interesting question. I have myself been looking at Nginx, mainly for its
capabilities a
- André Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I'll try it both ways to test.
>
> And regarding my other question... Should Perlbal handle the request
>
> first, and pass it to some varnish process or should varnish process
>
> the request first and send only the misses to PerlBal+Apache?
>
- ADOFMS Admin, SteveOC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is also a HTTP_X_VARNISH variable set as well, which is just a
> number. Any idea what this one does ?
This number is a request number you can use for debugging.
varnishlog outputs these identifiers and you can cross check with the n
- Ingvar Hagelund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rumors says 1.0.4 is on the stairs, banging at the door. It will
> probably include an update to the Debian package.
> I don't know if changes/updates will trickle into etch over the time.
> Stig, Lars?
For that to happen someone would have to bac
- Kenneth Rørvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw the same problems with 1.0.2 on redhat - empty documents
> returned
> after a while, possibly related to filling up the disk backend file.
>
> 1.0.3 fixed it here, I didn't look deeper into it.
1.0.3 worked here too. I always intended to ru
Hi all,
I have begun testing varnish on our main server pool, and the initial tests
worked smoothly.
However as soon as I put the box under load (gave it a slice of our production
traffic) it started "fumbling" requests. I know it's not a very good
description, but I have a hard time understand
- jean-marc pouchoulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all ,
> We are using zope/nuxeo cps with 8 zeo clients and I test varnish 1.3
> in place of squid 2.6.
> squid uses 8 zeo peers and if I've understood well varnish can have
> "only one" host per backend.
> is there is a way to load ba
- Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Denis Brækhus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, this is exactly what will happen, because Varnish does not yet
> understand the Vary: header which the server uses to indicate that
> the document it returns can v
Hi,
One of my developer colleagues has experienced an issue at Aftenposten with
regards to gzip and varnish.
I think you are experiencing the same issue we had, that is Varnish doesn't
really handle gzipped data from the backend intelligently yet. So you could
have the following scenario:
0. V
- Olivier Dobberkau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as i understood varnish can bei used in different setups:
>
> A) On a single Server. Listening on Port 80 forwarding to localhost on
> a special port.
>
> B) On a server forwarding to different backends.
You can make varnish listen on a
- Kenneth Rørvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Denis Brækhus wrote:
> > So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current release
> to be?
> (http://www.hio.no) for three weeks + now. In that time, there's been
> one major incident, in which varnish
- Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, if a page uses cookies, you can't cache it. That goes for
> any proxy, not just Varnish.
Yes I know that.
> By default, Varnish goes into PASS mode if the client includes a
> cookie in the request. It will however cache a page d
- Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The differences between the released version and the svn trunk are
> currently very small (a few bug fixes).
So SVN would actually be more stable then?
> Whether Varnish is usable in a production environment depends on the
> nature of your ap
Hi list,
I have scanned the pretty light backlogs on the Varnish lists, and I haven't
seen much discussion on the current state of Varnish. There was mention of
problems with lighthttpd, but other than that I couldn't find much..
So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current releas
27 matches
Mail list logo
