vpopmail-5 versions?

2001-10-04 Thread Jurjen Oskam
Hi all, sorry to bother you with this one, but I couldn't find a conclusive answer in the archives or on the website. Currently we use the latest vpopmail release, along with the latest qmailadmin release, as referenced to on http://www.inter7.com/freesoftware/index.html. What is the current

RE: Bad code in vdelivermail

2001-10-04 Thread Marcus Williams
-Original Message- From: Gabriel Ambuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [snip] If whence is SEEK_END, the offset is set to the size of the file plus offset bytes. So I think it actually should read lseek(0, 0L, SEEK_SET); I think I missed the most

Re: Bad code in vdelivermail

2001-10-04 Thread Alex Kramarov
This has been fixed in the latest version (or at least according to the AUTHORS/Changelog it has!). You are correct about the pipe stuff though. This is the main stumbling block for using procmail on a domain wide basis in the new versions of vpopmail because you cannot do | procmail blah

RE: Bad code in vdelivermail

2001-10-04 Thread Marcus Williams
-Original Message- From: Alex Kramarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [snip] I would really apriciate to get your patch, because the lseek is the main stumbling block for alot of stuff - i personally trying to use vpopmail with postfix, and it is working fine with 4.9.10, but not

Where to find the final version of vpopmail 5.0 !!!

2001-10-04 Thread Mathieu Meylan
Hi, in the changelog of vpopmail, I see: version 5.0 09/25/01 - add #ifdef for POP_FETCH lib - delete tcprules temp file in case tcprules has an error - system users were not able to pop auth relay, fixed - add new QA_ADMIN flag for qmailadmin

Re: Setting up ORBZ.org with qmail

2001-10-04 Thread Richard A. Secor
A little off the subject but... Anyone else have a problem with ORBZ.org where they put you on their list because you accept mail for yourself!!! -Rich - Original Message - From: Brendan McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 15:55 Subject:

bouncing trouble -- huh?

2001-10-04 Thread David Gartner
Hello all, I have qmail+vpopmail+qmailmrtg. I'm not sure if it's qmail or vpopmail giving me grief, so bear with me. This server has been active and I kinda just stumbled upon this, and I have no idea what it means or what's causing it. I'm getting flooded with this message in the log

Re: vpopmail-5 versions?

2001-10-04 Thread Justin Heesemann
sorry to bother you with this one, but I couldn't find a conclusive answer in the archives or on the website. Currently we use the latest vpopmail release, along with the latest qmailadmin release, as referenced to on http://www.inter7.com/freesoftware/index.html. What is the current

vpopmail-5 versus --enable-large-site=y?

2001-10-04 Thread Ricardo A Guimaraes
Hi, vpopmail 5.0 no work with --enable-large-site=y (and mysql)???

RE: Upgrade

2001-10-04 Thread Troy Settle
Is this 5.0 final? I've just recently (yesterday) got caught up with this list, and saw several problems/resolutions with 5.0, and want to be sure that everything is golden before I start working with the new version. TIA, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 - 866.477.5638

Re: Gabriel Ambuehl vaddaliasdomain changes.

2001-10-04 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Brad, Wednesday, October 03, 2001, 9:19:25 PM, you wrote: links. There is definately better ways to handle aliased domains. I have tons of aliased domains left over in my virtualdomains, rcpthosts, and assign files from when I deleted the domains. If

Re: Upgrade

2001-10-04 Thread Bill Shupp
on 10/4/01 11:12 AM, Bill Shupp at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: No. As far as I know, it's still considered a pre-release. I'm aware of a few problems, not all of which have been fixed yet. And the current fixes available are not in that release. When it's done, it'll be posted on the

Re: Upgrade

2001-10-04 Thread vol
I just got back from our status meeting. Apparently, there ARE some things to fix in the 5.0 tarball, but 5.0 is considered to be stable except for database aliases. It hasn't been updated on the webpage because that hasn't been resolve, although Ken is unable to reproduce the reported problem.

per user rbl patch for vpopmail

2001-10-04 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, I think I finally managed it to implement per user rbl into vpopmail (after a whole bunch of failed attempts). Basically, I scan the mail header for the IP of the delivering MTA and if it is in the rbl, the mail will bounce. rbl will only be used for

Re: per user rbl patch for vpopmail

2001-10-04 Thread Bill Shupp
on 10/4/01 1:51 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: Hello, I think I finally managed it to implement per user rbl into vpopmail (after a whole bunch of failed attempts). Basically, I scan the mail header for the IP of the delivering MTA and if it is in the rbl, the mail will

Re: Upgrade

2001-10-04 Thread Tren Blackburn
Hi Bill; I am using vpopmail 5 with mysql, valias support in mysql, on redhat 7.1 (gcc 3.0 though) and I have no problems with valias. It's working as expected. Anything I can do to help ya troubleshoot? Regards, Tren. On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Bill Shupp wrote: on 10/4/01 12:29 PM, [EMAIL

Re[2]: per user rbl patch for vpopmail

2001-10-04 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Einar, Friday, October 05, 2001, 12:11:08 AM, you wrote: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 98759 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2001 22:11:13 - Received: from hellriser.bordewich.net (HELO

5.0 Beta - Problems with Sybase

2001-10-04 Thread Troy Settle
When building, I got the following errors from vauth.c: vauth.c:119: `SITE_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function) (along with several other lines with 'SITE_SIZE' in it) Second, the configure script has incorrect locations for the sybase lib and include directories. On FreeBSD (with