Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.16 oddities

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Weiner
On Saturday, February 15, 2003 10:00 PM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, to start off, i just want to make it clear that I am not > arguing, I am just trying to become more clear. If you mean understand, then ok :) > > > On Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:32 PM, Cory Wright wrote: >> In ord

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.16 oddities

2003-02-15 Thread Jim
Well, to start off, i just want to make it clear that I am not arguing, I am just trying to become more clear. On Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:32 PM, Cory Wright wrote: > In order to fully understand this you need to have a good understanding of > how qmail's virtual domains work. The .qmail-de

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.16 oddities

2003-02-15 Thread Cory Wright
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:10:17PM -0500, Jim wrote: > I have a .qmail-default and a .qmail-jim, which both have > | /usr/local/bin/spamc | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' > /home/vpopmail/domains/jimtest.com/jim > &[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > .. messages to spam _should_ just be placed in > /home/

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.16 oddities

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Weiner
On Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:10 PM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:40 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: > >> This is exactly how it _should_ behave. Your .qmail-default is setup >> so that all _unmatching_ addresses will be put in the "jim" Maildir. >> But you have a re

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.16 oddities

2003-02-15 Thread Jim
On Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:40 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: > This is exactly how it _should_ behave. Your .qmail-default is setup > so that all _unmatching_ addresses will be put in the "jim" Maildir. > But you have a real account for "spam", so vdelivermail sees that and > puts it in the "spam" M

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.16 oddities

2003-02-15 Thread Bill Shupp
On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 04:22 AM, Jim wrote: I've been using vpopmail 5.3.9 for a while, with [seemingly] no problems. I upgraded to vpopmail 5.3.16, and noticed some new behavior. i have my server hosting a non-registered domain -- jimtest.com. i have two users on this domain; [

Re: [vchkpw] Out of interest

2003-02-15 Thread Brad
Further to this, I understand all machines will be different with hardware and software limitations... I am just wondering what would be the max given the best system possible, and what has actually been done in practice :) Brad On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 11:43, Brad wrote: > Just a quick question...

[vchkpw] Out of interest

2003-02-15 Thread Brad
Just a quick question... Can anyone tell me how many domains/users vpopmail can handle? Both theoretical and what has actually been tested? Thanks Brad

Re: [vchkpw] disk quota per domain

2003-02-15 Thread Yee Siew Chin
Please change the qmailadmin ownership to root. Rgds, Yee --- Manish Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have done the same as u directed.I assigned OS > quota to a user test. > I have added a domain > > #./vadddomain -u test xyz.com > > the command works well. But when I login in to

Re: [vchkpw] disk quota per domain

2003-02-15 Thread Yee Siew Chin
Please change the ownership to root. Rgds, Yee --- Manish Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have done the same as u directed.I assigned OS > quota to a user test. > I have added a domain > > #./vadddomain -u test xyz.com > > the command works well. But when I login in to > qmailadm

[vchkpw] Re: Duplicate Messages.

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Bknonix, On Saturday, February 15, 2003 at 12:16:39 AM you wrote (at least in part): [unreadable top posting fixed] And the output of: cat /.qmail-default >>> | /home/VMail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> | /home/VMail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox >> And y