At 25/05/04 18:44 (), François Wautier wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this list.
I recently installed on a Gentoo linux
qmail 1.03 (r13)
vpopmail 5.4.0
maildrop 1.5.3
qmail-scanner 1.16 ( With some modifs)
Everything was working well until t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 27, 2004, at 6:49 PM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0400, you wrote:
These patches don't have any glibc stuff in them, and they do check
for catch-all aliases.
Sorry for being picky, but my patch has not internal glibc st
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0600, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I'll ask, nextly, to join the development group and develop a robust
subset of calls solving this problem (for all, not only for chkuser).
Help on vpopmail would be welcome, at least by me, [1] but creating
another set of call
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0400, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These patches don't have any glibc stuff in them, and they do check for
catch-all aliases.
Sorry for being picky, but my patch has not internal glibc stuff inside...
Just it must call vpopmail, who has glib s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 27, 2004, at 2:48 PM, Alex Borges wrote:
Im setting up a new debian woody box, with vanilla imap (your,
upstream courier imap) and ive been working on courier-imap on other
woody boxes for the past 2 years. So im somehow experienced (though
no
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I'll ask, nextly, to join the development group and develop a robust
subset of calls solving this problem (for all, not only for chkuser).
Help on vpopmail would be welcome, at least by me, [1] but creating
another set of calls is not a good way to handle this problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 27, 2004, at 4:54 AM, Linux-Guru wrote:
I found a patch [1] at [2] which enables qmail to first check against
vpopmail
if the user (email-address) is existant before accepting mail for it.
Yesterday I asked in #qmail (IRC-channel) for any experi
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:26 am, Tonix wrote:
*ahem*
+#include
*ahem*
If you comment out this line, you have this compilation error:
In file included from qmail-smtpd.c:45:
/vpopmail/include/vpopmail.h:133: syntax error before `*'
This is the guilty 133
Im setting up a new debian woody box, with vanilla imap (your, upstream
courier imap) and ive been working on courier-imap on other woody boxes
for the past 2 years. So im somehow experienced (though not much...).
Okay, the problem is this. In my other woody box (running for ages)
everything is
On Thursday 27 May 2004 1:16 pm, Zachary Bedell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On May 27, 2004, at 10:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I want to block a vhost with about 100 pop3-Accounts, but dont want to
> > delete this vhost with vpopmail.
> >
> > -> qmail dont s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 27, 2004, at 10:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to block a vhost with about 100 pop3-Accounts, but dont want to
delete this vhost with vpopmail.
-> qmail dont shell deliver to this vhosts the incoming emails.
Do someone know what its the b
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:26 am, Tonix wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> it looks like there is a "trust" against this patch, just saying
> generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing
> able, mainly, to make another one working.
>
> This patch is highly responding to DJ security and p
Hi folks!
I want to block a vhost with about 100 pop3-Accounts, but dont want to
delete this vhost with vpopmail.
-> qmail dont shell deliver to this vhosts the incoming emails.
Do someone know what its the best way to do it?
Can I manipulate a control file to do it best?
Does vpopmail work wit
Hi,
I have nothing but great things to say about Tonix's patch and the code
is quite straight forward to read, even for an old C programmer like me.
I use it personally and have it installed on more than 20 ISP and end
user systems with no problems.
Regards,
Rick
Tonix wrote:
Tobias,
it looks l
I don't have that load, so I can't say. For my needs, routine is
practically not existent, and far much less heavy than qmail-scanner.
For sure your outgoing queue will be reduced, and your network traffic
will drop (because all "wrong" messages will be stopped before entering).
Just you'll have
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Another question:
Does this patch look, if there is a "catch-all" for the domain?
Yes, does look for catchall, aliases, mailing lists.
Is there anything to take care of when using vpopmail with MySQL in
conjunction with t
Alex,
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
..
But there is at least one problem that can be considered as bug.
if you use comments in .qmail-default like in:
#| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.de/use
* Tonix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-27 11:31]:
> This patch is running in hundreds of productions sites since more than two
> years (without a bug and without any performance problem), and I'm
> receiving dozen of e-mails, each month, thanking for it.
Tonino,
I appreciate your work and use the p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2004 11:26 schrieb Tonix:
> Tobias,
>
> it looks like there is a "trust" against this patch, just saying
> generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing
> able, mainly, to make another one working.
>
> Thi
Tobias,
it looks like there is a "trust" against this patch, just saying
generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing
able, mainly, to make another one working.
This patch is highly responding to DJ security and programming models,
while all the rest around (including vpo
Hi list,
I found a patch [1] at [2] which enables qmail to first check against vpopmail
if the user (email-address) is existant before accepting mail for it.
Yesterday I asked in #qmail (IRC-channel) for any experiences and/or
recommendations with this patch and have been told by Jeremy Kitchen
Hi,
We're running vpopmail and things work well except I have a question
regarding the relay records... In our Mysql table relay we always get
two enries starting with ::fff:. They are the local ip ::fff:127.0.0.1
and our local network ::fff:195.xxx.xxx. I have seen people talking
about older v
22 matches
Mail list logo
