Bob Ababurko wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] moving maildirs to a new home
On Mar 21, 2005, at 8:38 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
i feel that all that I have to do is remedy the uid:gid an
On Mar 22, 2005, at 1:01 AM, Bob Ababurko wrote:
I have to ask againshould changing the uid:gid in the assign file
to
reflect the system, work? It seems like that would be the other way
around
the mess instead of changing the systema(vopomail:vchkpw ID's)
Yes (after running qmail-newu to upda
> I did check and it seems that my uid, gid for vpopmail and vchkpw are
different than the original box. I tried to change the uid:gid in the
/var/qmail/users/assign file but I still cannot authenticate. I am working
with freeBSD and it seems that changing the gid is not as simple as editing
the
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Goodrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] moving maildirs to a new home
> > I did check and it seems that my uid, gid for vpopmail and vchkpw are
> > different than the original box. I tried to cha
Bob Ababurko wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I did a qmailrocks install this time around and it
> used some abnormail uid:gid of 1009:1004, respctively.
>
> When you say, "change UID and
> GID accordingly"...what do you mean by that? I have changed the
> assign uid:gid to 1009:1004, but that does not
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] moving maildirs to a new home
> On Mar 22, 2005, at 1:01 AM, Bob Ababurko wrote:
> > I have to ask againshould changing the uid:gid in the assign file
> >
Jason Wilkinson wrote:
Bob Ababurko wrote:
Unfortunately, I did a qmailrocks install this time around and it
used some abnormail uid:gid of 1009:1004, respctively.
When you say, "change UID and
GID accordingly"...what do you mean by that? I have changed the
assign uid:gid to 1009:1004, but that
Blake wrote:
> Jason Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> Bob Ababurko wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Unfortunately, I did a qmailrocks install this time around and it
>>> used some abnormail uid:gid of 1009:1004, respctively.
>>>
>>> When you say, "change UID and
>>> GID accordingly"...what do you mean by that? I have ch
Is there a command in vpopmail that I can use to set quota limits on
every domain on my system? I don't want to set per account quotas, but
rather a per domain disk limit. Is there an easy way to do this, other
than by modifying each domains' .qmailadmin-limits file?
Thanks
Hi,
I have created a mail-filter, that I run from
/home/vpopmail/domains/0/domain.name/username/.qmail
The .qmail file is as follows:
|/lbs/intraweb/mailfilter.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/home/vpopmail/domains/0/domain.name/username/Maildir/
This script either exits with a 0 to let it deliver the mail
On Mar 22, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Håkon Nessjøen wrote:
The problem is that when the script exits with 99, qmail says it's a
deferral (with no trailing description), and bounces the message, so
it's
executed every bounce.
Bounce = exit 100. Defer = exit 111. OK = exit 0.
I'm not sure what 99 is used
+ Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Bounce = exit 100. Defer = exit 111. OK = exit 0.
|
| I'm not sure what 99 is used for.
Hi,
In qmail-command man page you are told about these options:
If the filter exits 99, the mail is silently dropped on the floor.
If the filter exits 0, the mail is de
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 05:53 pm, Håkon Nessjøen wrote:
> + Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> | Bounce = exit 100. Defer = exit 111. OK = exit 0.
> |
> | I'm not sure what 99 is used for.
>
> Hi,
>
> In qmail-command man page you are told about these options:
>
> If the filter exits 99, the ma
Evening Tom,
Just testing 5.4.11 and the quota seems to be incorrect.
limits: No user limits set.
dir: /home/vpopmail/domains/munged.com/laurabelle
quota: 1000S
usage: 99%
last auth: Tue Mar 22 14:45:48 2005
du in her home dir gives
2600./cur
68 ./new
4 ./tmp
4
+ Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| actually, to be more precise:
|
| 99 means that the delivery was successful, but that qmail-local should
| ignore all further delivery instructions;
If you ask me, it's two views of the same thing.. They are both correct in
their own ways. The mail is "sile
Never Mind,
I'm an idiot. It's working too well now :)
Regards,
Rick
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Evening Tom,
Just testing 5.4.11 and the quota seems to be incorrect.
limits: No user limits set.
dir: /home/vpopmail/domains/munged.com/laurabelle
quota: 1000S
usage: 99%
last auth: T
On Mar 22, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Håkon Nessjøen wrote:
But my question is, why doesn't vpopmail sucessfully deliver on a 99
exit
value? It returns a deferral.
What version of vpopmail?
I just looked at run_command(), and it does _exit(99) if the called
program exits with an exitcode of 99.
--
Tom Co
/* Name of package */
#define PACKAGE "vpopmail"
/* Version number of package */
#define VERSION "5.2.1"
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. mars 2005 07:26
Til: vchkpw@inter7.com
Emne: Re: [vchkpw] Mails bouncing with .qmail in user-dir
On Mar 22
I can see that there is no hanlding of 99 in my version. I will have to
upgrade. Are there any big differences in 5.2.1 -> 5.4.10 that I should have
in mind before I do a make install with 5.4.10?
Here is the old code:
-- snip from vdeliver.c --
switch(wait_exitcode(wstat))
{
case 64: c
19 matches
Mail list logo