RE: [vchkpw] vdeliver perimission denied for vadddomain -u

Guys, There's one thing I don't understand - why does vadddomain have the -u and -i/-g options in the first place, if they don't seem to work fully? Perhaps I am missing something for which I apologize, but I can't imagine those options having been implemented to partially support non vpopmail

Re: Re[10]: [vchkpw] Issues with vpopmail

Kindlly help me in uninstalling vpopmail... Thanks --- On Fri, 11/27/09, Remo Mattei wrote: From: Remo Mattei Subject: Re: Re[10]: [vchkpw] Issues with vpopmail To: vchkpw@inter7.com Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 7:42 PM Re: Re[10]: [vchkpw] Issues with vpopmail I am not sure what he i

Re: [vchkpw] vdeliver perimission denied for vadddomain -u

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Mussulis wrote: > Guys, > > There's one thing I don't understand - why does vadddomain have the -u and > -i/-g options in the first place, if they don't seem to work fully? > > Perhaps I am missing something for which I apologize, but I can'

RE: [vchkpw] vdeliver perimission denied for vadddomain -u

Hi Matt, Thanks for your reply, which is what I suspected all along - I am more than certain something is wrong on my end, but for the life of me I can't figure it out yet. And yes, I agree, it MUST be permission related. As for the versions:- Fedora 12 x86- qmail 1.03 with jms1 combined patch

[vchkpw] Committed changes to 5.5 trunk for FreeBSD

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ChangeLog as follows: 5.5.0 - Current Matt Brookings - Fixed a small build bug with cdb - Updated vusaged subdirectory to use main source tree's copy of storage.h - Fixed a number of issues with FreeBSD detection of endian and handling of 64b

[vchkpw] 5.4.29 updated in subversion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've also posted a patch that implements similar fixes from 5.5, in 5.4.29. - -- /* Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -

RE: [vchkpw] vdeliver perimission denied for vadddomain -u

In your example the thing that pops out is the user you add is "mike42" however the user you're assigning the domain to is "mike4". Is this a typo? Or deliberate? t. -Original Message- From: Michael Mussulis [mailto:mike_at...@hotmail.com] Sent: December-01-09 8:19 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.c

[vchkpw] Committed changes to 5.5 for Solaris

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've submitted changes to 5.5 so that it will compile and run under Solaris. Many of these changes will need to be made in 5.4.29. That is my next task :) - -- /* Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key FAE0672C Software developer