Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-30 Thread mysteryadmin
On 27 Jan 2004 11:57:01 -0800 Tom Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't exist, qmail is attempting to bounce the message back to the sender. Most of these are

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-30 Thread Jacob S.
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:10:17 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27 Jan 2004 11:57:01 -0800 Tom Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't exist, qmail is

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-30 Thread mysteryadmin
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:10:17 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27 Jan 2004 11:57:01 -0800 Tom Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't exist, qmail is

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:45, Oden Eriksson wrote: Or, try to apply the check user patch to the smtp server so the email never makes it into your queue. Would it be possible to make a domain that uses this technique but forward all mail to another server, as a gateway? checkuser patch

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-28 Thread Tom Jackson
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 23:02, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: checkuser patch uses vpopmail calls. the domain would have to be in vpopmail on the other server and/or would require some more advanced configuration. I ran into another problem. My mx server, which really shouldn't have email addresses is

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
please don't include me in the receipient list of messages posted to the list. I already get a copy, I do not need multiple copies, thank you. On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 01:45, Tom Jackson wrote: I ran into another problem. My mx server, which really shouldn't have email addresses is listed in

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-28 Thread Oden Eriksson
onsdagen den 28 januari 2004 08.02 skrev Jeremy Kitchen: On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:45, Oden Eriksson wrote: Or, try to apply the check user patch to the smtp server so the email never makes it into your queue. Would it be possible to make a domain that uses this technique but forward

[vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-27 Thread Tom Jackson
I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't exist, qmail is attempting to bounce the message back to the sender. Most of these are failing, the messages are obviously spam. I'm running vpopmail on the

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-27 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 1:57 pm, Tom Jackson wrote: I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't exist, qmail is attempting to bounce the message back to the sender. Most of these are failing, the

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-27 Thread Jacob S.
On 27 Jan 2004 11:57:01 -0800 Tom Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't exist, qmail is attempting to bounce the message back to the sender. Most of these are

Re: [vchkpw] bounce maybe used to relay spam

2004-01-27 Thread Oden Eriksson
tisdagen den 27 januari 2004 20.59 skrev Ken Jones: On Tuesday 27 January 2004 1:57 pm, Tom Jackson wrote: I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't exist, qmail is attempting to bounce the