RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-27 Thread Brian Lanier
-Original Message- From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:12 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql At 17.47 20/01/2005, you wrote: So based on what you have said, if chkuser relies on vpopmail

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-20 Thread Brian Lanier
-Original Message- From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:29 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql Brian Lanier wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-20 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.47 20/01/2005, you wrote: So based on what you have said, if chkuser relies on vpopmail commands to determine existence then my current setup should work just fine. If chkuser directly reads the virtualdomains file, then I will have problems. Hi Brian, chkuser relies on vpopmail for domains

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-19 Thread Brian Lanier
-Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:03 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: This is where I am not clear and would love

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-19 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 01:42 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:03 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-19 Thread Rick Macdougall
Brian Lanier wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:03 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: This is where I am not clear

RE: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-18 Thread Brian Lanier
Quexion No more spam. No more viruses. www.quexion.com -Original Message- From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 1:17 AM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql I feel these two statements are not in opposition

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-18 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23 pm, Brian Lanier wrote: Ok... Maybe I don't understand qmail as much as I thought or I can't find the info in the man pages. My understanding is if the domain is listed in virtualdomains, then qmail-send treats this delivery as local and will not read

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
I feel these two statements are not in opposition. chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains. When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be added automatically as it is

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 10.17 14/01/2005, you wrote: I feel these two statements are not in opposition. chkuser checks recipients only for domains who are in virtualdomains. When a domain is already inside virtualdomains, for a new user you may simply add a new line with MySQL vpopmail database, and the user will be

[vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 and vpopmail w/mysql

2005-01-12 Thread Brian Lanier
Quick question that I can't seem to sort out myself. I see people are doing the same thing based on the archives but I can't seem to find a definitive answer. Using a smart host relay to do initial mail checking running qmail. All my virtual domains are setup up correctly but not listed in the