On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:36:18AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-30 17:26, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for
于 2012-4-30 17:26, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
installation machine is
Re: [vdsm] Introducing a
validation test package to vdsm
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:22:20AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-27 5:13, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12:06PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
One more comment about the test package version. Most likely, the
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
installation machine is not the same one, and additional check
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:23:49AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-26 22:35, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hear your
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
installation machine is not the same one, and additional check is need
which is ignored at building time, so I think some test cases should be
also run on target machine to check potential errors, Then I want to
introduce a
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hear your opinions.
Thanks for the idea! Do you have a sample test for the verification test
suite?
Will it be your
One more comment about the test package version. Most likely, the
package version will be the same version as the VDSM package version.
The rule we need to consider is: Should we keep the back compatibility
with the VDSM files? Say allow newer version test package running on
older VDSM
On 04/26/2012 10:35 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hear your opinions.
Thanks for the idea! Do you have a sample
于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
installation machine is not the same one, and additional check is need
which is ignored at building time, so I think some
于 2012-4-27 5:13, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12:06PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
One more comment about the test package version. Most likely, the
package version will be the same version as the VDSM package
于 2012-4-26 22:35, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hear your opinions.
Thanks for the idea! Do you have a sample test for
13 matches
Mail list logo
