On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:56:37PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote:
>
> A Darren Dunham,
>
> My environment looks like this:
[snip]
I can't help you specifically, I just think about things like this:
Netbackup DB (tpconfig/vmoprcmd)
generic scsi ("scan")
OS presentation (MS device manager, Linux tape de
A Darren Dunham,
My environment looks like this:
Master1 Solaris
Media1 Linux
Media2 Windows
Media3 Windows
Media4 Windows
Media5 Windows
Running tape -scan on each shows:
Master1 : 0, but the netbackup gui finds 7...
Media1: 9, gui finds 9 as well
Media2: 9, gui says unable to retreive device
Every time I have seen the -1 -1 -1 I had issues with the drive in NB and had
to remove and read.
Always happened when something on the SAN went "a little wrong".
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Beha
Thanks for the info Judy,
Netbackup actually does not report any -1,-1,-1
I had only seen this in one of the Windows tape drive driver installers. One of
my windows machines that is only seeing 5 of the 9 drives showed the first 5
drives with normal bus, location, id numbers. but the last 4 dr
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:22:48PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote:
>
> I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is
>
> *
> ** SDT_TAPE *
> *
>
> and nothing...
So it's not currently detecting tape drives on the scsi-compatible
busses. I imagine if you t
You need to delete the drives from windows netbackup gui and re add them
Doug Preston
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Brandon35
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 2:23 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN
The -1 -1 -1 says that it has lost the info on the drive.
Try it by hand via the gui
Go devices
Drives
Open up a drive that shows -1 -1 -1 for one of your windows servers
>From that window highlight the line for the media server that shows the -1's
Choose remove
Say ok
Let it update.
Once t
I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is
*
** SDT_TAPE *
*
and nothing...
Is there anyway to get this same information on a windows box?
What if i'm getting -1, -1, -1 ??
+
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:24:59PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote:
>
> Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address...
>
> Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0
> Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0
> Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0
> Drive 4 Loca
I meant duplicate Targed ID, not bus. Sorry
+--
|This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
Drive 1 through 5 is on Switch A
Drive 6 through 9 is on Switch B
So that could be why the Location addresses are duplicating. Would that cause a
problem though?
+--
|This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Centr
All of my san drives show bus 0, thought this was normal.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Brandon35
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:25 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veri
Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address...
Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0
Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0
Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0
Drive 4 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 4, LUN 0
Drive 5 Location: Bus Number 0, Ta
Martin, Jonathan: I tried http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315539 to view
possible hidden tape drives due to path change. They did not appear.
pharrold: While that is a very useful command in situations where it's needed,
wouldnt deleting all the drives and rescanning for them via Netbackup's
C
Is anyone using NetBackup 7? If so, please identify the pros/cons of using it
along with the gotchas. Thank you.
Will Tucker | Storage Administrator
Enterprise Technology Services
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
Direct +1 678.597.6644
Phone +1 770.955.7070
Fax +1 814.295.9676
Mobile +1 770.490.5
You do not need an agent if the Master is 7 and it is for monitoring a NBU
master server. Yes, there is an engineering binary to fix the polling issue.
Contact support.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
You need to install an agent in order to get the collections working.
The agent can be installed on the master or on the Opscenter server. We
couldn't install on the master because the agent wasn't supported on our
master platform x86 Solaris.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@m
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, ansa wrote:
> We trying to use Opscenter for reports, but its seams as if its a little
> buggy.the polling agents stops working sometimes and we have never had
> an "last successfull data load" anybody got some ideas ?.
>
http://www.aptare.com
:-)
Ed Wilts,
Hi
We trying to use Opscenter for reports, but its seams as if its a little
buggy.the polling agents stops working sometimes and we have never had an
"last successfull data load" anybody got some ideas ?.
+--
|This was sen
(Knowing nothing about Win2008R2 and little about VMs, ...)
I'd want to get together with my network folks to see if I'm getting dropped
packets during the test.
Misconfigured connections and overloaded routers can kill performance.
I'd also look at windows performance stats ... perhaps memory is
If you enable compression after x number of days on a windows master then
NetBackup compresses the catalog entries using NTFS compression after x days.
(as opposed to gziping on Unix/Linux.) I didn’t really get anything working. I
just compress everything for my “warm” DR (robo)copy. Basically,
Load balancing come from the storage unit group.
Here is a snippet - please read up more on Storage unit groups to find your
best option.
Option 4: Load Balance. If the user selects this option and installed the
Capacity Management License key, Media Device Selection (MDS) balances the job
lo
1. make sure all services are running.
2. try deleting devices drive/robot from the GUi. If it fails you can use
vmglob -delete xxx from a command line.
Once the devices are removed.
3. Run scan or sgscan in /volmgr/bin
You should see a robot and x number of drives.
Note: if you do
To a single drive:
Checked and found that the device files are missing from the server.
Below are the files that are presently on the server:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root8 Jul 7 14:40 h2c0t2l0 ->
/dev/st1lrwxrwxrwx1 root root9 Jul 7 14:40 nh2c0t2l0 ->
/dev/nst1
Would agree with this.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:14 PM
To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.aub
Wonder if its worth deleting the drives from the Server (within
NetBackup) and re-running Device Configuration Manager again?
In regards to the missing drives, any power or cabling issues? Is it
happening to one single drive all the time or the same drive.
From:
Had recent issue like that, just reseated the fibre cable in the drive and in
the switch and it came back fine.
Can't hurt to try it.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of pranav batra
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:30 AM
Hi Jonathan
I thought Symantec did not support compressed volumes on a Catalog? But
good to hear you got it working.
Simon
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: Wednes
Is it possible to specify alternate location for /tmp while running bp
command ?
TIA
-Shyam
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Hello,
Here we have a master/media server:-OS is Linux 2.4,RHEL 3.A tape library dell
PV 132T-LT02 with two tape drives connected to it via scsi.
2 days ago drive path of one of the drives showed as missing.Rebooted the
library+Server couple of times then tried to reconfigure the drives:-But on
Unix - on aix if I had done that I would bet my tape drive would have gone from
avail to defined - where defined says it is in the database but cannot see the
physical. So I would have removed it and run cfgmgr to rediscovery the tape
drives. Not sure how that works on Solaris
As to windows,
When I'm doing my tests, I'm running the job only on a single client. I
noticed some high latencies on the guest using the built in tools when
running a test job yesterday, so I'm going to pursue your ideas further.
Thanks for your feedback!
--
Jack Forester, Jr.
Sr. Data Protection Administr
I've seen this also. As much as people want to make Windows and UNIX play
nicely together, there are just somethings that don't translate between the
systems. The file system and file structure is one huge difference.
I would see similar issues when logging into our AIX master server using th
Not sure on the Windows side, as that sounds like hardware/firmware. However,
on the Solaris media server try running tpautoconf -report_disc
Its possible EMM is having "issues" with the new WWNs being presented and
thinks some of the drives are duplicates.
Fairly easy to clean up once
34 matches
Mail list logo