Hello Simon,
For 2nd, there was an issue late in 6.5.x with pst files with high data
movement (mail copy, deletion etc.) during snapshot time. These pst files were
restorable but some of the mails were missing which were moved during snapshot
time. It's fixed with 7.0 onwards.
Praveen
From: ve
Umm this isnt VMware I am referring to . Its RAW Disk on a Physical
Box.
S.
-Original Message-
From: ccosta@gmail.com [mailto:ccosta@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 4:29 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
veritas-bu@mailman.e
It turned out rpcbind was not setup correctly. This is a note that the Sun
Engineer sent me:
Symptoms
Although RPC is enabled on the ACSLS server, RPC clients cannot
communicate to it.
rpcinfo, when called from the client server, fails with an "Authentication
error".
# rpcinfo -p acsls_hos
Just a data point for you. We're still on ACSLS 7.3 under Solaris 10 and
have had zero issues going from 6.5.4 -> 7.0 -> 7.0.1 -> 7.1 -> 7.1.0.1.
The robot definitions were defined soley through the gui after the initial
7.0 upgrade and don't have anything specific to the robot in the vm.conf.
Jo
I wish I could but that's all I have.
+--
|This was sent by juan.guz...@artioglobal.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
__
Hi All,
Fresh install of NBU 7.1 with ACSLS 8.0.2, both on Solaris 10. I am unable
to get NBU to communicate with ACSLS without forcing the port to communicate
over in vm.conf (ACS_CSI_HOSTPORT). This works fine until the ACSLS
application is restarted and the port changes.
I noticed with NBU
Can you give more details on what the BMR bug is?
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of jrguzmanr
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:13 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu]
there is a bug in bmr, which support will be put out an etrack shortly. How
"shortly"? I can't tell, those are symantec's words.
+--
|This was sent by juan.guz...@artioglobal.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@back
Hello Simon.
I can answer you only to the first question.
Unfortunately the file restore of a single file can take as long as a full
restore, as netbackup has to read the backup to find the file. If the file
is in the beginning of the backup, then it is fast, else..
For the 3ed, you can alway
To improve restore performance I was told by SYMC that I would need to enter
the individual ESX host that this VM lives on into the Credentials > Virtual
Machine Servers section. This will bypass the V-center host and your media
server will send the data directly to the ESX.
Its an admitted bu
Hi,
I am evaluating FlashBackup-Windows. I am backing up a 1.8TB Volume,
with millions of 1kb files and via SAN, its taking 3 days.
During a quck FB-Windows Test Policy, I got this down to 7 hours.
However, 2 questions:-
1) Not been able to test, but is there a downside to restore times for
this
Cant even remember what you wrote dave as I deleted it !
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of David
McMullin
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 10:09 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc:
12 matches
Mail list logo
