Agreed, great thread
We currently have a SUN VTL that has NDMP functionality. i.e. the
physical drives are zoned into the vtl only. Add the drives are
configured as NDMP drives.
The idea was to utilise SLP's for the primary write to the vtl and
duplicate off to physical with the VTL acting
Darren
Have written the code already in perl if you want a copy? Runs daily, figures
out what vtl volumes have been returned to scratch in the last 24 hours and
labels accordingly.
Regards
David Clooney
Midrange Design and Build (MRDB) - Storage
Internal x 66059
External +44 20 8760 6059
is not
aware of this until it tries to write and fails so not a goer unfortunately.
Regards
David Clooney
Midrange Design and Build (MRDB) - Storage
-Original Message-
From: bob944 [mailto:bob...@attglobal.net]
Sent: 09 October 2009 05:21
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: Clooney, David
Hi All
Does anyone know if you can make a subset of drives in a library read only in
NBU . i.e. I want a specific 10 out of 50 drives in a robot to be read only for
duplication purposes?
Regards
David Clooney
Midrange Design and Build (MRDB) - Storage
Notice to recipient:
The information
Quite right
Any media server/filer that wants to utilise drives needs to have FC visibility
of them.
We use this quite a bit i.e. the same drives zoned into media servers and
filers, then utilise SSO.
Regards
David Clooney
-Original Message-
From:
Hi All
When adding a ndmp media changer via tpconfig as apposed to the GUI
wizard, does anyone know how to determine the Netapp bus,target, lun
co-ordinates for the changer.
The NDMP manual doesn't reveal much
NBU 6.5, solaris 10
Working environment
TLD(16)robotic path = mc1 (emalonfp02n1
Nathan
1.)You want the cap mode automatic as as I understand it once all
your volumes are in the cap or the cap is full it places in cap in an
eject state, otherwise the cap has to manually be placed in an eject
state.
2.)Once the eject is initiated in the Vault, the job will wait
[mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: 20 July 2009 12:42
To: Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remommended maximum # of drives per media
server.
Hi Dave,
That depends on how much throughput you can drive through the
motherboard/network/disk.
LTO-3 = 90MiB/s
Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: 20 July 2009 12:57
To: Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Remommended maximum # of drives per media
server.
Hi,
When I used to use NDMP I had one media server (i did not setup
Hi All
We have a situation that I am struggling to resolve, even with the aid of
symantec.
All NBU 6.5.3.1
Solaris 10 cluster Master
Solaris 10 media server
HPUX 11.00 media server
SUN VTL Plus 2 with NDMP 4 functionality
L700 with 4 stk T10k drives with encryption -
All
Solaris 10 64 bit, NBU 6.5.3.1
In the old 5.1 days I was able to look a the bpsched log in order to
quickly determine the num of available drives the scheduler thinks a
storage unit has available.
Anyone know how to determine this info quickly in 6.5.3.1?
Regards
David Clooney
Enterprise
Agree with ed, check the fundamentals, i.e. utilise set_ndmp_attr
-verify or tpautoconf.
We currently share 20 9940B drives amongst 2 solaris 10 media servers, 2
windows servers and 4 FAS NetApp's no problems.
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
From:
NBU wise is should work np. However maintenance wise I would stick
with unix/linux, unless your VB skills are up there ?
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
Internal X66059
External +44 20 8760 6059
david.cloo...@bankofamerica.com
-Original Message-
From:
Hi All
Anyone aware of NBU 6.5.3.1 having a limit on the number of drives in an
environment.
When trying to add more than 200, we are getting
Already configured the max number drives for this version
Adding this drive would exceed the maximum allowed
Surely 200 is pretty minimal,
You need to specify whether it's a backup or archive
bplist -B/A -C EKMS -t 13 -s 03/22/2009 00:00 -e 03/23/2009 00:00 -R /
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
Internal X66059
External +44 20 8760 6059
david.cloo...@bankofamerica.com
-Original Message-
From:
We were looking to setup the same environment, we are starting to look
at merging 3 NBU domains into 1. And will therefore be able to inventory
a library at site B. as one domain NBU would know about these volumes.
No need for importing etc merely lose sight A, inventory site B.
Regards
David
You would first have to make siteA volumes non-rbotic and then inventory
site B.
NBU will assume a tape has been pulled from 1 library and reinserted
into another. Its key to make siteA volumes non-robotic however before
inventory'ing site B.
The replication i.e. same volume will be down to your
to be honest, any additional info would be
appreciated,
Regards
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
From: Bill Roth [mailto:william.c.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2009 18:11
To: sm...@peppas.gr
Cc: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL
Thanks for the info Bill
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
From: Bill Roth [mailto:william.c.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2009 22:04
To: Clooney, David
Cc: sm...@peppas.gr; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL Replication between 2 sites
David
Hi All
Hit another snag in a new deployment, seem to be requiring knowledge
from the group on a number of occasions over the last couple of months,
its appreciated.
Our DR environment has just acquired an STK SL3000 and we are having
issues with the robotic config in NBU.
If you run the wizard
Hi All
Hit another snag in a new deployment, seem to be requiring knowledge
from the group on a number of occasions over the last couple of months,
its appreciated.
Our DR environment has just acquired an STK SL3000 and we are having
issues with the robotic config in NBU.
If you run the wizard
...@serverwarecorp.com]
Sent: 11 March 2009 14:31
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: STK SL3000 - NBU 6.5.3
David,
I saw this in a posting a few months back...since we resell the STK line
I hung onto it in case I ever needed itit may or may not resolve
your issue...let us
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: STK SL3000 - NBU 6.5.3
OK, trying again...another previous post to this forum I saved about
this library:
The SL3000 is set to HLI by default. I'm told this is what you'd use
with ACSLS. But for those of us who prefer FC... In SLConsole
Hey Pat, long time
We use this config across all our environments, R200 and the FAS series.
No issues what so ever.
Regards
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
the vault will then meet its criteria?
Thanks in advance
David Clooney
From: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel [mailto:gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz]
Sent: 04 March 2009 21:54
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Vault Query
No, Vault can
Hi All
Am I correct in saying that vault can only vault backups and not
duplications?
I.e. I am busy implementing a VTL(with NDMP functionality) and utilising
NBU Lifecycle management polices.
As the VTL is equipped with NDMP Version 4 we are able to zone in
physical drives on the
Correction - couldn't start emm
All
We have just upgraded a SUN clustered Solaris 10 NBU 6.0 MP4 to 6.5.3.
6.5 GA went on fine, along with 6.5.3 with no errors whatsoever, however
we initially couldn't start the emm. With the help of symantec we can
now start emm however queries to emm are
All
We have just upgraded a SUN clustered Solaris 10 NBU 6.0 MP4 to 6.5.3.
6.5 GA went on fine, along with 6.5.3 with no errors whatsoever, however
we initially could start the emm. With the help of symantec we can now
start emm however queries to emm are missing volumes etc.
Anyone had these
Hi All
NBU 6.5.1 Master Solaris 10
NBU 6.5.1 windows 2003 Media
We have process whereas we split an HDS shadow image pair and mount the
secondary volume onto the root of c: on one of our NBU windows media
servers, then take a backup.
i.e. once the process has completed the volume is
To: Clooney, David
Cc: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: 6.5.1 windows Flash backup restore
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Clooney, David wrote:
Hi All
NBU 6.5.1 Master Solaris 10
NBU 6.5.1 windows 2003 Media
We have process whereas we split an HDS
david.cloo...@bankofamerica.com
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: 08 January 2009 14:48
To: Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: 6.5.1 windows Flash backup restore
Dave,
I would give that a try, but first, do ONE
Wilts [mailto:ewi...@ewilts.org]
Sent: 08 January 2009 15:22
To: Clooney, David
Cc: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; jpis...@lucidpixels.com;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.1 windows Flash backup restore
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Clooney, David
david.cloo
Bill
Are you using VTL Plus version 1 or 2? As version 2 Release 3 now offers
NDMP 4 which enables NBU to incorporate any physical devices visible to
the VTL into a NBU storage unit.
What this means is that your VTL would become the data mover over FC as
apposed to your current setup where your
Hi All
Does anyone know if there a replacement for bpgp and bpdir in 6.5?
Regards
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and
may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the
intended addressee
Hi all
Just a quick one for confirmation, I upgraded an environment weekend
just gone from 5.1MP6 to 6.5.1.
Our DBA's are informing me that they are having issues launching jbpSA
from the oracle clients.
Clients are still at 5.1 MP6 so I guess this is to be expected due to
version
2008 16:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] client - jbpSA
We saw lots of issues with RMAN backups until we upgrade the clients to
match the master when we went to 6.x
My advice would be to migrate to a unix master.
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
Internal X66059
External +44 20 8760 6059
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: 26 November
I have certainly used that exact method in 5.1 and included the
class,policies etc etc using rsync and it works a treat.
6.5 am yet to investigate the possibilities, if any.
Regards
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
Internal X66059
External +44 20 8760 6059
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
I am trying to give some advice to one of international customers that
are trying to implement a netbackup solution on a restrained budget.
Kit list
1 X Master/media
1 X STK SL148 (SCSI attached)
2 X LTO
They will be trying to backup a couple of TB's of data throughout the
PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2008 18:08
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] create mediaDB entry
If you go all the way to NB 6.5.2 or higher (and I'd definitely
recommend not stopping there), you've got an additional optional
available for bpmedia
Hi All
In our step towards upgrading to 6.5.1 from 5.1 MP6 it has become
apparent that some media servers where not decommissioned correctly in
the passed causing inconsistencies between the media and image catalogs.
We have 2 media servers that I do no have a copy of the mediaDB file.
Hi
I have just had new solaris 10 servers handed over to me from our SA's
in order to start the process of upgrading to NBU 6.5.1.
My first step is to get NBU 5.1 MP6 onto these new masters then migrate
current 5.1 env to new servers and the finally upgrade.
I have copied all the 5.1
Much appreciated rob
That was right on the money
Regards
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
From: rob worman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 October 2008 17:20
To: Clooney, David
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 16bpauthorize main
To add
In most situations there will only be 1 volDB located on the master
server, then each media server will have its own copy of a mediaDB.
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
Internal X66059
External +44 20 8760 6059
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL
Thanks
Yes we use NDMP, interesting thoughts about having one of the drives
visible to a media server, will check it out.
Dave
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
Internal X66059
External +44 20 8760 6059
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ALL
Solaris 8 Master 5.1 MP6
NetApp Filer - FC STK L700 + drives
Does anyone know if its possible to bplabel volumes that reside in a
library that a filer has sole use of?
The library and drives are connected via FC to the filer.
Thanks
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The information
Thanks
That's the issue, standard media servers I have no problem labelling the
volumes however the filer I seem to be having an issue.
Reason for labelling is to accurately report on VTL cache size.
Regards
David Clooney
Enterprise Storage Services
-Original Message-
From:
Hi All
I have just implemented a SUN VTL, the issue i now encounter is that i
need to recycle old available media into the backend of the VTL.
I have new labels that i can label the cartridges up with externally, my
concern is the tape header information, is there a way through acsls 7.2
to
Hi all
I have just been delivered a new Solaris 10 media server.
As this is the first Solaris 10 media server in our environment, can
anyone point out any pitfalls that differ from solaris 8 regarding the
installation.
Regards
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet
Thanks Justin
V440 server (4 CPU, 8GB, 2 x Gb network)
Regards
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2008 12:20
To: Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 MP5 - solaris 10
On Mon, 14 Apr
As an immediate now world we live in.
What are the possibilities of having an instant message capability.
Personally, I know I would be able to contribute a hell of a more if
this was possible. As apposed to sending a mail when I need help.
What's everyone's thoughts, preferably over http due
Thanks Ed
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2008 16:16
To: Clooney, David
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Architecture advice
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Clooney, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi ALL
I was wondering whether i could pick some of your brains.
Master/Media Solaris 8 - 5.1 MP6
I have recently implemented a SUN/FalconSTor VTL into an Netbackup
environment I look after, previously in the physical world there where
18 X 9940B drives shared by the Solaris master/media, a
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2008 13:29
To: Clooney, David
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Architecture advice
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Clooney, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it worth my while
Bob
Where are you issuing the command from? Personally I would run from the master
and use the -h switch, reason for this each media server keeps a separate copy
of its on media DB. So you would need to specify which host to expire the
media. Pre NBU 6 of course.
The other option is that it
Jared
could you possibly send the link again, doesn't seem to work for me.
would be quite interested in this.
Thanks
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 February 2008 20:14
To: Deiter, Scott
Cc:
remember its a soft SCSI release and not a hardware release.
From: Clooney, David
Sent: 31 January 2008 10:13
To: 'WEAVER, Simon (external)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Whats Best Practice for SSO in NBU 5.1
vmoprcmd -crawlreleasebyname drive_name
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: 30 January 2008 16:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Whats Best Practice for
To: 'Greenberg, Katherine (ISD, IT)'; Clooney, David;
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Urgent Help
NetBackup 5.X will ONLY use 6 Characters in the bar code.
You can pick the 6 to use by the method below, but it will only use 6.
Bobby Williams
2205 Peterson Drive
In the middle of implementing a VAL, have just inventoried and the first
2 characters of the virtual media barcode have been removed.
From: Clooney, David
Sent: 29 January 2008 17:00
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Urgent Help
Hi All
Hi All
Solaris 8 5.1 MP6
Does anyone know if I can restrict specific hosts when connecting with
the Java GUI.
I.e I want a handful of machines to be able to connect to the master via
the java gui and not any machine that has app installed?
Thanks
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The
Another option would be to analyse the bptm logs on the media server
doing the writing to ascertain whether you are supply enough or too
little data.
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 November 2007
Daniel
What version of netbackup? I have pefromed this operation sucessfully on
5.1 MP6
Regards
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimenez,
Daniel
Sent: 27 November 2007 19:28
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:
Hi ALl
solaris 5.1 MP6 platform, has anyone gone through the required process
of upgrading VXSS prior to embarking on the NBU 6.0/6.5 upgrade.
If so any info would be appreciated
Regards
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is
Personally I think the 5.1 master hostname change is a walk in the park.
After I had planned and tested the change, we did however have Symantec
PS on site looking over my shoulder in order for it to be supported.
Money spinner if you ask me as all the work was performed by myself.
Easy day out
Top man Rusty
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2007 17:17
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade 5.1 MP6 to 6.5
I also was a little confused by this, but as long
Hi All
I am imminently upgrading a Solaris 8 master server from 5.1 MP6 to 6.5
in preparation for the rest of our environments
I have been reading through all the documentation and there are a lot of
references to clustered environments, now I am taking that the
documentation id referring
Justin
Maybe tail your bpbrm log for more info whilst its happening.
dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: 13 November 2007 15:40
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Restore problems: Error
Make sure you know what you're doing,
You'll most probably find /usr/openv is in fact /opt/openv/.
Other than that though I have performed numerous upgrades 5.1 X and my
back out plan has always been an archive of /opt/openv
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hi All
Was wondering whether I could pick some brains.
I am starting to plan the upgrade of NBU from 5.1 MP6 to NBU 6.5.
We have three NBU domains with a Master server(Solaris 8 64 bit) in
each.
Additionally we are planning for the installation of SUN/Falconstor
VTL's per domain
Hi all
Someone sent me the NBU 5.x to 6 upgrade guide.pdf
document a while back however I have deleted it by mistake due to
mailbox limits.
And yes, I should be shot for not backing up a copy :-)
If that someone could forward it again it would be much appreciated
Thanks
Thanks for the rapid response all
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:03 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.x to 6 upgrade guide.pdf
Hi all
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2007 14:41
To: Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup exit notify
We set up a special account that is allowed to send e-mail from the
server being
All
Solaris 8
Does anyone know how to change the senders address when backup notify is
executed on the master server?
i.e. at the moment we get [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need to change it to adhere to policy
Thanks
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The information in this
the library /opt/openv/lib/libVbp.so the
mail program is being used so will endeavour to check the servers
mail.cr to possibly masquerade.
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2007 16:26
To: Clooney, David
Cc: veritas
Windows or Unix env ?
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: 13 September 2007 13:56
To: Lawler, Michael C.; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Script to see skipped files
I
Of Clooney,
David
Sent: 13 September 2007 14:03
To: Martin, Jonathan; Lawler, Michael C.;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Script to see skipped files
Windows or Unix env ?
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Morning all
5.1 MP5
This morning we had vmd core dump, which in turn filled up the root file
system. It was easy enough to get everything back to working order
however we would one begin to investigate why this happened.
I have checked all the obvious suspects . i.e bperror problems,
Hi All
Is there any chance someone could clarify MPX for me.
If you have MPX set to 4 for example and there are 4 streams hitting the
drive. All 4 streams are writing in parallel as the tape spins. And if 3
streams are writing at 15mb/sec and 1 stream is writing at 10mb/sec,
would the
2007 12:43
To: 'Justin Piszcz'; Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MPX Explanation
All streams have a buffer associated with them (SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS and
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS).
The streams fill the buffers. When a buffer is full, it goes to tape.
Watch
Thanks Kev
Ready for what exactly ?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Whittaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 September 2007 12:57
To: Justin Piszcz; Clooney, David
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MPX Explanation
I would agree, that is what I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
S4 10mb
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Regards
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 September 2007 13:25
To: 'Kevin Whittaker'; Clooney, David; 'Justin
Nice post Curtis
We are currently purchasing 2 sun VTL3540's and 1 Sun VTL2540.
After reading below could you clarify for me, is there no way that the
vtl's can duplicate between each other(disk) and still somehow create
NBU catalog entries. i.e duplicating outside of NBU but still createing
NBU
Simon
You need to remove the following file
{install_path}/VERITAS/VolMgr/misc/.ltisymlinks
And try again.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: 30 August 2007 07:03
To: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Thanks Tejas
What if our unix NIS domain and windows domain are separate entities? Is
it possible to authorize a user on a media server when the account does
not exist i.e unix windows accounts are different ?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z :-)
You removed the file yet ?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: 30 August 2007 15:50
To: 'Jeff Lightner'; Preston, Douglas L;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU
Ouch,
Whats up, drives/library visible through the hBA's ?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 August 2007 16:17
To: Clooney, David; Jeff Lightner; Preston, Douglas L;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU
First run a bpplclients -allunique -noheader $file
Then
usage: /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/update_clients [-ForceInstall
-Install_Client_Bins -Install_ADC] \
[-ClientList filename | hardware_type operating_system]
Dave
From: [EMAIL
Kyle
Possible idea would be to create the command and populate it into some
sort of temp file using your non-root user, then have a job in roots
cron that incorporates a sleep and an if statement in a loop looking
for these files, it runs once found and puts the output somewhere where
you
Thanks Simon
This is exactly the route we are taking before the year is out.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: 29 August 2007 09:25
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade 5.x
From the GUI's yes, how bout the command line ?
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LTejas
Sent: 29 August 2007 13:19
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re: Anyone successfully implemented VXSS?
Kyle, if you need
Jared,
That's just the tip of the iceberg, that is a specific VXSS command and
should work straight off the bat, wait till you start trying to use the
standard NBU commands to pull of info from media servers etc out there
that are possibly running on different platforms. i.e windows and unix
The current environment I work in uses VXSS after working in many that
haven't. From my point of view it is a pain in the arse.
Whenever I encounter issues VXSS is disabled first, just recently I was
developing a cross site catalog backup strategy utilising NBU catalog
command line utility
Thanks Jonathan
From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2007 14:50
To: Clooney, David; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] bparchive
BPARCHIVE will not remove the data unless the backup completes
I was under the impression that if the drives are directly attached
there is not a lot that can be done from an NBU point of view.
If you are running a 3 way scenario then the touch file could possibly
make a difference, I seem to remember from the past that if you are in a
3 way setup you can
-
From: Clooney, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 4:31 AM
To: Len Boyle; Martin, Jonathan; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Performance
I was under the impression that if the drives are directly attached
there is not a lot that can
how would SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS_NDMP be implemented,
somewhere on the filer itself ?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2007 15:06
To: Clooney, David; Martin, Jonathan; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NDMP
We too use 262144 buffer size with 9940B's, and achieve in excess of 50mb/sec
on exchange backups, albeit on HDS.
The blocksize limitation is a windows 2003 SP1 issue that is overcome by
installing hotfix 873422, we too use the STK driver and needed this hotfix to
overcome the limitation.
Hi All
Does anyone have some perl code, that they wouldn't mind sharing, that
chops up bpdbjobs -report -all_columns, with filelist count , number of
tries etc,?
Regards
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is confidential and
Thanks Mike
That will certainly prove useful
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mike Andres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 July 2007 14:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Justin Piszcz
Cc: Clooney, David; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] bpdbjobs -all_columns
Here's
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
