Re: [Veritas-bu] Another bpstart, oracle and streams question

ularly as you run into all of the > edge conditions and you'll cuss and swear as you stumble over them. > Bottom line: it can't be done reliably. > > Use a different method of coordinating this. > > .../Ed > > On Jan 31, 2008 8:57 AM, Dave Markham <[EMAI

[Veritas-bu] Another bpstart, oracle and streams question

Guys im running Netbackup 6.0mp4 and a number of oracle SSO media servers backing themselves up. Solaris9/10 This has been mentioned before many times im sure and i found a thread on it called 'Yet another bpstart/bpend questions' but i dont have a copy of it to reply to. Basically as im runni

[Veritas-bu] full and incremental resetting

Guys can people just confirm something. If i have a full backup using a weekly_full tape pool and say run it on a Saturday. Then have cumulative incremental running in the week using a daily_inc pool on Sunday -> Saturday (obviously the full will run on the Saturday as its the schedule seen le

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5.1mp4/5 Win2k3 x64 binaries

Gabe, The MP4 .exe files are on the support website and contain what you need. Here the appropriate Tech Notes and downloads: NetBackup Installation Files And Support For x64 Servers And Clients http://support.veritas.com/docs/294816 Maintenanc

[Veritas-bu] Backups only writing to one storage unit group member

I'm on netbackup 5.1 mp4 on solaris. I set up some storage unit groups using disk staging storage units (dssus). Backups that point to these groups are only writing to the first member in the storage unit group, there's nothing being written to the second storage unit. The first storage unit i

[Veritas-bu] Retentions

Guys im being asked by management a bit of a stupid question but i don't know for 100% so thought id check here. If i have a retention set to 6 months i assume it is 6 months e.g from 02/01/07 to 02/07/07 and not 6 * 4 weeks or a certain number of days? I know you can edit retentions but im just

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cannot expire media

Winner! I have ran it and it has updated all media servers successfully and i now can expire the media. Cheers Dave Markham wrote: > Dude you are right. The problem is i had a guy next to me who was doing > the upgrade and knew all the steps ( apparently ). As im new to 6 im > only jus

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cannot expire media

Dude you are right. The problem is i had a guy next to me who was doing the upgrade and knew all the steps ( apparently ). As im new to 6 im only just finding out these things now. I have read the documentation since and as you say it says you can run it but doesnt mention if you can run it after b

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cannot expire media

. I assume because it communicates with the now 6 Master server. d Dave Markham wrote: > And to add when i do bpexdate -m -d 0 -force im getting message > > "requested media id was not found in the EMM database" > > I know that as it was written on the SAN media server th

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cannot expire media

M database Cheers Dave Markham wrote: > Running Netbackup 6.0MP4 on Solaris 9 for Master server. 3 x SAN media > servers running Netbackup 5.0mp7 on solaris. > > Im have recently upgraded my master from 5 to 6 and am now trying to > free up some tapes by expiring them. > > When i do

[Veritas-bu] Cannot expire media

Running Netbackup 6.0MP4 on Solaris 9 for Master server. 3 x SAN media servers running Netbackup 5.0mp7 on solaris. Im have recently upgraded my master from 5 to 6 and am now trying to free up some tapes by expiring them. When i do bpexpdate -m -d 0 im getting an error saying "could no deassig

Re: [Veritas-bu] Slow media server after nbu 6.0mp4 upgrade

Thanks for that. No i didnt actually run the -modify_5x_hosts command =-O Would it be ok to run now? Strangely the backup speeds last night for that media server seem to be ok at around 29mb/s Dont ask about why we havent upgraded the media servers. When you work in a large company the way t

[Veritas-bu] Slow media server after nbu 6.0mp4 upgrade

Guys i have just upgraded my master server to nbu 6.0mp4 running on solaris 9. I have 3 media servers which are SSO and back themselves up. All connected via fibre to shared drives. Master server and 2 of the media servers backup fine and at good speeds but one media server now runs like a dog.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Suspend or Freeze media

Going to freeze media [$tape]" bpmedia -freeze -m $tape if [ $? = 0 ];then echo "Media frozen successfully" else echo "Problem freezeing media [$tape]" fi done Hope that helps Dave Weathers, Matt wrote: > We are trying to phase our our LTO

Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade to 6.5 or 6.0MP4

those not in the US. Every customer of mine that has attended has found this user conference to be a huge benefit to them, so I would suggest you start thinking about attending if you can. You can find out more about Vision 2008 here: http://vision.symantec.com/ Best Regards, Dave David K. Carpe

Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade to 6.5 or 6.0MP4

lease. You should ask for an update from you Symantec Sales Team. Dave David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer Symantec Corporation Office: 646.487.6012 Mobile: 908.963.6818 Home Office: 973.940-1805 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROT

[Veritas-bu] VxVM VxFS EOSL

Guys sorry for posting but hopefully someone can help. Im trying to find a recent sheet for EOSL on Veritas file system and Veritas Volume Manager. Also what are the current versions. I've only found this so far which was written in 2004. Anyone point me in the right direction? http://ftp.support

Re: [Veritas-bu] how can i back up NT4

Mark, Yes you can. NetBackup always supports clients one release back. Dave David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer Symantec Corporation Office: 646.487.6012 Mobile: 908.963.6818 Home Office: 973.940-1805 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From

Re: [Veritas-bu] Solaris 10 with NBU 5.1 MP5 -- Tape Drives disappearing

Im not sure if its still relevant for Solaris 10 but i remember in the device admin guide it mentions that solaris unloads the least used devices should the system be busy. These are usually tapes and so it recommends adding the following lines into /etc/system forceload: drv/st forceload: drv/sg

Re: [Veritas-bu] Reg: Media Server

Linux Media servers and Windows Master servers are definitely supported with NBU 6.0. You can have any combination of Masters and Media Servers. Are you having trouble adding the new media server or are you just asking if it is supported? Dave David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer

Re: [Veritas-bu] SSO slower than network issue

like 35MBs. Anyone any tips? Cheers Dave Markham wrote: > Guys i just added a SAN Media server to my configuration and am doing a > test backup after some initial problems. > > Its working but im getting like 2382 KB/s ( just going off the gui for > the moment as iostat -xn

[Veritas-bu] SSO slower than network issue

Guys i just added a SAN Media server to my configuration and am doing a test backup after some initial problems. Its working but im getting like 2382 KB/s ( just going off the gui for the moment as iostat -xnd 2 10 |grep rmt on solaris 10 doesnt look to me working like it does on sol 8/9. Anyw

[Veritas-bu] sso question

guys i have master server running sol8 connected to L700. L700 has 7 drives in it. Master can see 6 of them through fiber Med1 can see first 3 drives shared Med2 can see first 3 drives shared Med3 just added has access to drives 5,6,7 and can see them fine. I have just loaded a tape on the mas

Re: [Veritas-bu] Licensing info

AR or Symantec rep > and they can get some prices to you. Hope this helps > > > > > Reneé Carlisle > ServerWare Corporation > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham > Sent: Thursday, Oc

[Veritas-bu] Licensing info

Guys im searching around the symatec site but just cant find what im after and end up going around in circles. I need to find out what licenses i will require for a new solution. New solution will be :- Sun Server V245, (Master/Media) Sun StorageTek C4 with 2*LTO3 drives (Library) nn Clients I

[Veritas-bu] netbackup 5 san media on sol10

Has anyone had to create a SAN Media Server on Solaris 10 using netbackup 5.0 (mp7). My master is on solaris9. Im just wondering if there are any specific steps to do. I've made a client work on sol10 but had to mess around with some service thing and inetdadm (maybe wrong). Any pointers would b

Re: [Veritas-bu] Tapeless backup environments?

Guys i've just read this thread and can say im very interested in it. The first thing is i learned a new term called deduplication which i didn't know existed. Question : I gather Deduplication is using other software. DataDomain i think i saw mentioned. Where does this fit in with Netbackup and d

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

ade 6 or 6.5 > > > > > I would recommend upgrading to 6.0MP4 first, and get that working. > Let 6.5 stabilize for awhile before making that plunge. 6.5 was > just released. > > > = > Carl Stehman

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

d 6.5), 5.x is also supported. There's > an updated support statement which you can find here: > http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290017.htm > > I couldn't put my finger on anything that talked about 6.0/6.5 end of > support life, but would expect such a statement afte

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

when 7 comes out 6 will be no longer supported as i beleive NBU only goes 1 level back for support? Dave Justin Piszcz wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Dave Markham wrote: > > >> Has anyone got 6.5 yet? We are running NBU 5.0 MP7 on a predomintatly >> solaris platform. We are d

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

Has anyone got 6.5 yet? We are running NBU 5.0 MP7 on a predomintatly solaris platform. We are due to upgrade h/w and s/w and i was wondering was it worth going for 6.0 which seems to be used quite a bit by people now, or do we go to new 6.5 ? Also we have around 20 servers including a 2 node Sun

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 but with exclude list plus open file disabled -NEW INFO

> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/2004-June/023649.html > > Ah.. Old issues die hard. > > -J > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave > Markham > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:28 AM

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 but with exclude list plus open file disabled

having problems. Cheers Martin, Jonathan wrote: > Tried this yet? > > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/2004-June/023649.html > > Ah.. Old issues die hard. > > -J > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

[Veritas-bu] Status 14 but with exclude list plus open file disabled

Strange problem i have posted about before where im getting a status 14 on a windows client. Master server is Solaris 9 running Netbackup 5.0mp7. I am getting status 14 on full backups and the error is a known problem :- WRN - Content Indexing Server: unable to pause catalog: Web (some files may

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange Status 25 on connection

l Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave > Markham > Sent: 26 July 2007 17:25 > To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange Status 25 on connection > > Thanks ill give it a go. We wondered about DN

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange Status 25 on connection

kup\bin: bpclntcmd -ip xxx.xxx.xxx.58 > > > That should fail. Fix the DNS issue or add a entry to the host file and > it should work. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave > Markham > Sent: Thursday, Jul

[Veritas-bu] Strange Status 25 on connection

Im having a very strange problem with Netbackup 5.0MP7 on Solaris connecting to a windows 2003 client. Couple of the windows clients have been upgraded to 2003 and after installing the client i cannot back them up and get status 25. Using the gui shows cannot connect on socket (Status 25). The s

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpdbjobs -all_columns

I haven't got a script but you may find this useful http://www.backupcentral.com/components/com_mambowiki/index.php/How_do_you_decipher_the_output_of_%22bpdbjobs_-report_-all_columns%22%3F Justin Piszcz wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Clooney, David wrote: > > >> Hi All >> >> >> >> Does anyone

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 52 but scratch available

Yeah its just one master/media server with network based clients. There are no tapes stuck in the drives and tpconfig -d shows all up and using robtest shows no tapes in the drives either so i dont think its a stuck tape :( D WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote: > Dave > Just a quick shot, wha

[Veritas-bu] Status 52 but scratch available

other systems they seem to freeze quite easily :( Dave ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

finished eventually (1 hour to do 2 gb) and resulted in a status 1. V. odd Was fine on mp4 :( Dave Markham wrote: > Thanks. Sorry for not checking thoroughly got loads on atm :( > > > > Weber, Philip wrote: > >> Exactly the symptoms we were getting. >> >>

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

member now). > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 06 July 2007 11:11 >> To: Weber, Philip >> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu >> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update &

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

d by a security policy), > the problem is resolved. > > regards, Phil > > Phil Weber > Business Technology (Egg) > Storage Technical Services - Senior UNIX Technologist > Phone: 01384 26 4136 > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

Guys i have just updated our Netbackup 5.0 environment to MP7. Master server is Solaris9. All stuff was fine with upgrade but now some of the windows clients dont seem to backup correctly. They get a portion of the way through and then this message appears and they grind to a halt until i cancel t

Re: [Veritas-bu] NOT ME!

If you contact you local Symantec rep or SE, I'm sure they can provide you with references. I have a major financial firm, who I cannot name without permission, that uses both. Dave David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer Symantec Corporation Office: 646.487.6012 Mobile: 908.963.6818

Re: [Veritas-bu] NOT ME!

Veritas Configuration Manager tracks changes real time in you entire environment, informs of what the change is, who made it and immediately after the change. It can also show you critical paths in your environment and allow you to see how any changes will affect the whole environment, not just ba

[Veritas-bu] SAN Media server question

Guys running Netbackup 5.0Mp7 on solaris 9 environment. I have a master server connected to L700 via fibre through a SANBOX2 switch to robot and 6 drives. The master server has 2 HBA's ( as i believe Sun impose a limit of 3 * LTO2 drives per 2GB HBA ). I have 2 SAN Media servers ( DB nodes ) eac

[Veritas-bu] Sol 10 Files to backup query

Guys i have a df -k output on a solaris 10 client i need to backup. I didn't build the box and dont have any sol10 experience so was querying what infact of this is normal/standard and what is bespoke to this box. I.e the /devices dir seems odd to me so do i need to back it up? Its 0 bytes but sure

[Veritas-bu] command line version of "search backups"?

I've found that one of the clients I'm backing up has a bunch of mp3s, wavs, m4as, movs, avis, etc. I'd like to print out a nice formatted report of the file names but I'm not sure how to do that. I'm able to see the file names by pretending to do a restore and searching for *mp3, *wav, etc but

Re: [Veritas-bu] Identify drives in use

Justin Piszcz wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Dave Markham wrote: > > >> Justin Piszcz wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Dave Markham wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Netbackup 5.0MP7 Solaris9 >>>> >>>> Anyone know

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5 Solaris 10 client help

to run the commands manually. > > Search the list, they have been posted before. > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Dave Markham wrote: > >> Guys can i install a Netbackup 5.0 client onto solaris 10? >> >> Im just about to push the client software over, but im sure sol10 deals &

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5 Solaris 10 client help

Guys can i install a Netbackup 5.0 client onto solaris 10? Im just about to push the client software over, but im sure sol10 deals with inetd.conf differently etc. Any ideas? ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman

Re: [Veritas-bu] Identify drives in use

Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Dave Markham wrote: > >> Netbackup 5.0MP7 Solaris9 >> >> Anyone know how to identify from command line what drives are in use, or >> what tapes are in use while a job is running. >> >> We have an issue

[Veritas-bu] Identify drives in use

Netbackup 5.0MP7 Solaris9 Anyone know how to identify from command line what drives are in use, or what tapes are in use while a job is running. We have an issue where ops keep opening the jukebox and changing tapes while jobs are running. The job is fine as the L700 library just suspends writes

[Veritas-bu] bpstart_notify timeout

Guys can you have a BPSTART_TIMEOUT directive in bp.conf on a per client basis? Reading the doc it just mentions it on the media server properties but i dont want it set globally. Netbackup 5.0MP7 Solaris kit. Cheers ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-

Re: [Veritas-bu] Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4 to 6.0 MP4

Read all of the replies and had to laugh. 90% of the problems that came with 6.0 were because people didn't do their upgrades correctly and didn't RTFM before pulling the trigger. They can only blame themselves, but hey, much easier to blame the software instead of going to your boss and telling hi

Re: [Veritas-bu] Doubts about license

Sorry, NBU 6.0 Keys are not backward compatible. Backups done in NBU 4.5 will be restorable from NBU 6.0. No you can't install any NBU 6.0 bits with 4.5. NBU 4.5 is out of support now and cannot be used with a NBU 6.0 Master either. Dave David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer Sym

Re: [Veritas-bu] Mac OS-X client install - how?

Use the CD - All Unix Clients in the MAC itself and run Vrts_pack.install -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Freemantle Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:39 AM To: Veritas List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Veritas-bu] Mac OS-X client i

[Veritas-bu] AVR Daemon

this issue or something like it ? suggestions ? Dave Brown Worknetinc This message (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 running on VCB Proxy Server

if I do anything As a side note, I am running NB60MP4 on Win2k3 Dave From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 8:39 AM To: Dave Brown; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 running on VCB Proxy Server

Hey there, I am looking at this very same thing. Was reading a little about it yesterday and going to read more today. May try to implement something, depends on how my reading goes Dave Brown From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 mp6

Bobby, The answer is actually included in the description, since it tells you to contact Symantec Product Support for the patch. The reason is because it is a patch and not a maintenance pack. Maintenance Packs go through a full and rigorous test cycle to ensure that the patches included do

[Veritas-bu] install encryption on client without using bpinst?

is it possible to install the encryption option on a netbackup 5.1 mp5 client without using the bpinst command? Our network/security requirements make bpinst not work. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.aubu

Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Service cannot start

your issue, just my two cents Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:11 AM To: Anas Kayal Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] EMM Service cannot start On Wed

Re: [Veritas-bu] Replacing tape drives

If you change the density on the LT02 drive to HCART, it will be able to read and write LTO media -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Klebba Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:41 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Verit

Re: [Veritas-bu] Using Windows SMTP to send email notifications

Yes, but that only states that the nbmail.cmd in bin directory may need to be configured. When looking at that script, it only refers to using BLAT. No info on SMTP From: Koster, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:50 PM To: Dave

[Veritas-bu] Using Windows SMTP to send email notifications

NetBackup 6.0 MP4 on Windows 2003 Anyone have documentation or point me to the docs on how to set this up ? Everything I see talks about using BLAT or some other 3rd party app, but why install 3rd party when SMTP is there ? Thanks Dave Brown Worknetinc This message (including any

Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux Agent

Contact the reseller and make them order you a 5.1 Media kit. Otherwise, contact you Symantec sales rep or SE and they can try and get you a temporary download for the software. David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer Symantec Corporation Office: 646.487.6012 Mobile: 908.963.6818 Home Office:

Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: Block or file level

Best Regards, Dave David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer Symantec Corporation Office: 646.487.6012 Mobile: 908.963.6818 Home Office: 973.940-1805 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 4:54 PM

Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: Block or file level

m nome de Ed Wilts > Enviada em: domingo, 28 de janeiro de 2007 15:18 > Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Assunto: Re: [Veritas-bu] Block or file level > > On 1/28/2007 10:53 AM, Dave Carpe wrote: > > Unless you specified backing up a raw volume, it will be a > fi

Re: [Veritas-bu] Block or file level

Unless you specified backing up a raw volume, it will be a file based backup. David K. Carpe Principal Systems Engineer Symantec Corporation Office: 646.487.6012 Mobile: 908.963.6818 Home Office: 973.940-1805 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

[Veritas-bu] Strange cfgadm issue

Guys we are attaching a L500 via fiber to a Solaris box running Solaris8. Got the latest SAN4.4.10 installed with all patches etc. When we do a configure on c6 it does the tape drives but errors when it comes to the robot itself. We have had the HBA replaced, the GBIC on the switch replaced. Stor

Re: [Veritas-bu] duplication of netbackup tape

Make it Primary -primary Search or duplicate the primary copy -number_copies 1 Only 1 Copy -L "D:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\Logs\NBduplicate\Dup-20060410134451.log" Log File -M wnsnb01 Master Server -mpx

[Veritas-bu] NBU 5 EOL

Anyone know at all when Netbackup 5.0 will be end of life or end of support? I cant seem to find info on the site. Needle haystack and all that. cheers ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/li

Re: [Veritas-bu] Running bpbkar32 from the command line

Was there any response to the original question here? Im interested in testing network performance from a client using netbackup. Cheers Weber, Philip wrote: > Bit of a problem if you've got icmp (and ftp, and...) disabled between > most servers & clients like we have. Is there anything similar

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client hang on system_state

mean the system_state backups will not be valid if files are in use? Cheers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Dave > > I presume the client will backup its local drives only. > What happens if you multi stream the backup with all_local_drives. Do > all drives apart from th

[Veritas-bu] Windows client hang on system_state

Have any of you seen a windows 2000 client hang on this file? /System_State/Boot_Files/catalog/CATMAST.cbd Im running NBU 4.5mp6 ( i know i need to upgrade ) with the master being on solaris8 attached to an L25. Its just this client has now started to hang backups and it remains active forever un

Re: [Veritas-bu] solaris client version level

Cant you just cat /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/version on each unix client? That tells you the maintpack level. If you had ssh and keys you could just loop your machines. e.g i do something like this from the master server which can ssh to each client as a certain user for box in `cat customer-box-l

[Veritas-bu] SYM06-024 question

I want to make sure I'm protected from this without having to go to the trouble of implementing VXSS or doing a maintenance pack upgrade. Can you help me decipher this part of the paragraph? "All other daemons associated with Veritas NetBackup derive access control from the NetBackup configurat

[Veritas-bu] LTO3 Drive Issues

while the stream were reporting 3mb/sec or better, the overall performance of the jobs appeared much slower. As a test, I ran the same job to my LTO2 drive and it just flew through. NB60 MP4 Windows 2003 Thoughts, Ideas, suggestions ? Dave This message (including any attachments) is

[Veritas-bu] LTO3 Read/Write LTO2

Well, My boss just got me a new LTO3 drive to put in my library. I asked for an LTO2 as I already have 2 of these in the lib and 100's of tapes but I have one nonetheless The lib sees the drive as does NetBackup but it says that there are no tapes available...barcode reader I'm sure. Is the

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 MP4 Install and DLL Hell

Yes, I have see the uninstall of nb client trash a completely unrelated application. I was doing 4.5 to 5.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:09 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.en

Re: [Veritas-bu] Errors on Exchange Store Restore

Did not apply as I do full every night on exchange. Did what it suggested anyway but still got same message From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 10:18 AM To: Dave Brown Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject

Re: [Veritas-bu] Errors on Exchange Store Restore

re: 1 files 9:50:50.439 AM: [1632.8268] <2> tar_base::backup_finish: TAR - restore: file data: 209080650 bytes 104 gigabytes From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Brown Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:32 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subjec

[Veritas-bu] Errors on Exchange Store Restore

condition in 5.1 ? Dave This message (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or duplication of this message by someone other than

Re: [Veritas-bu] DB backup tapes and DR

my DR netbackup server into my production netbackup server by restoring the catalogues ( and a bit of other jiggery pokery ). Hope that helps Dave Hindle, Greg wrote: > > Ok I have a DR question for everyone. I have 3 sites. All 3 of them > have master servers. All sites do tape vaulting

Re: [Veritas-bu] help please

Thats odd then, why when configuring catalogue backups to tapes it will only allow you to input media which is assigned to the Netbackup pool? Dave Curtis Preston wrote: > The NetBackup pool isn't reserved for catalogue backups. It's the > default pool that all backups go to un

Re: [Veritas-bu] Weird 52 error becuase it positions tape

Thanks for this. It seems when i ran a manual full backup it worked and since then the incremental have worked so i have not seen this issue since. It was just very strange having a 52 error when the unit looked like it reserved things correctly, mounted tapes, and started to position them for writ

Re: [Veritas-bu] help please

To note Nizar the Netbackup volume pool is a special pool reserved for the catalogue backups. I suggest you define a new volume pool for your backups and also create a scratch pool ( dont forget to check the scratchpool tick box ). Also dont forget in your policy or schedule to specify the volume

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multipathing San drives

Thanks guys you have all confirmed what i have told the so called solution designer to be true and that multipathing tape devices isnt an option. Cheers Marion Hakanson wrote: > On 12/4/2006 11:01 AM, Dave Markham wrote: > >> Guys has anyone heard of trying to have resilient Tape

[Veritas-bu] Multipathing San drives

Guys has anyone heard of trying to have resilient Tape drives over fiber? Someone came and asked me saying a new install was going to be specced having dual hba's providing 2 paths to the fiber attached tape drives. Im talking Solaris here and an L500 with LTO2 drives. I immediately couldnt see ho

[Veritas-bu] Weird 52 error becuase it positions tape

cesses not running. Anyone any other ideas where to look? Cant see anything obvious in bptm log on the media server. Occasionally theres an "unable to lock media offset" something error but the rest all looks ok. Dave ___ Veritas-bu mai

[Veritas-bu] Storage unit number of drives

shared drives and cause my media servers using SSO to fail. Im running ITC so need 2 drives at a time. Dave ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

hing/Monitoring closely today. do not want any issues over long weekend Dave From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 12:50 AM To: Dave Brown; List Veritas List Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken Symant

[Veritas-bu] media destination full

Netbackup 5.0mp4 Solaris9 connected to an L700 via fiber with 5 drives. (3 SSO with 2 media servers) Has anyone come across the below problem before and has a work around? One job seems to take over 24 hours for its full backup. We have plans in motion to get this machine added as with SSO but un

Re: [Veritas-bu] Recognise Media from NBU

Doesn't encryption help there ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:42 PM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Recognise Media from NBU I think Ed is referencing the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Changing expiration date

I want to extend the backup for a client. Wouldn't doing what you suggest create multiple retention dates on the same media and doesn't that cause other issues ? Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee, Kenneth (SBS US) Sent

[Veritas-bu] Changing expiration date

If I change the expiration date of a tape through the GUI, does that change the date of all images on that tape as well ? This message (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. You are hereby n

Re: [Veritas-bu] Oracle Backups

] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 12:39 PM To: Dave Brown; Peter DrakeUnderkoffler Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Oracle Backups You can't just delete archive logs, you have to use RMAN to remove them. Per one of my oracle DBAs. Go into RMAN, Conne

Re: [Veritas-bu] Oracle Backups

Oracle, it says backup this file but when it goes to do it, file does not exist. Make any sense at all ? Dave -Original Message- From: Peter DrakeUnderkoffler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 12:08 PM To: Dave Brown Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject

<    1   2   3   4   >