Re: [Veritas-bu] Suspend or Freeze media

2007-11-22 Thread Dave Markham
To add to the comments already if you want to freeze a lot of tapes in one go id do a simple loop so you can forget it. Once you have removed your scratch as previously explained try this to freeze all other media :- for tape in `bpmedialist -l | awk '{print $1}'` do echo Going to freeze

[Veritas-bu] VxVM VxFS EOSL

2007-10-26 Thread Dave Markham
Guys sorry for posting but hopefully someone can help. Im trying to find a recent sheet for EOSL on Veritas file system and Veritas Volume Manager. Also what are the current versions. I've only found this so far which was written in 2004. Anyone point me in the right direction?

Re: [Veritas-bu] Solaris 10 with NBU 5.1 MP5 -- Tape Drives disappearing

2007-10-22 Thread Dave Markham
Im not sure if its still relevant for Solaris 10 but i remember in the device admin guide it mentions that solaris unloads the least used devices should the system be busy. These are usually tapes and so it recommends adding the following lines into /etc/system forceload: drv/st forceload: drv/sg

[Veritas-bu] SSO slower than network issue

2007-10-10 Thread Dave Markham
Guys i just added a SAN Media server to my configuration and am doing a test backup after some initial problems. Its working but im getting like 2382 KB/s ( just going off the gui for the moment as iostat -xnd 2 10 |grep rmt on solaris 10 doesnt look to me working like it does on sol 8/9.

Re: [Veritas-bu] SSO slower than network issue

2007-10-10 Thread Dave Markham
35MBs. Anyone any tips? Cheers Dave Markham wrote: Guys i just added a SAN Media server to my configuration and am doing a test backup after some initial problems. Its working but im getting like 2382 KB/s ( just going off the gui for the moment as iostat -xnd 2 10 |grep rmt on solaris 10

[Veritas-bu] sso question

2007-10-09 Thread Dave Markham
guys i have master server running sol8 connected to L700. L700 has 7 drives in it. Master can see 6 of them through fiber Med1 can see first 3 drives shared Med2 can see first 3 drives shared Med3 just added has access to drives 5,6,7 and can see them fine. I have just loaded a tape on the

[Veritas-bu] Licensing info

2007-10-04 Thread Dave Markham
Guys im searching around the symatec site but just cant find what im after and end up going around in circles. I need to find out what licenses i will require for a new solution. New solution will be :- Sun Server V245, (Master/Media) Sun StorageTek C4 with 2*LTO3 drives (Library) nn Clients

Re: [Veritas-bu] Licensing info

2007-10-04 Thread Dave Markham
some prices to you. Hope this helps Reneé Carlisle ServerWare Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:11 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] netbackup 5 san media on sol10

2007-10-03 Thread Dave Markham
Has anyone had to create a SAN Media Server on Solaris 10 using netbackup 5.0 (mp7). My master is on solaris9. Im just wondering if there are any specific steps to do. I've made a client work on sol10 but had to mess around with some service thing and inetdadm (maybe wrong). Any pointers would

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

2007-09-24 Thread Dave Markham
-765-2703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Dave Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/20/2007 11:19 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc

Re: [Veritas-bu] Tapeless backup environments?

2007-09-24 Thread Dave Markham
Guys i've just read this thread and can say im very interested in it. The first thing is i learned a new term called deduplication which i didn't know existed. Question : I gather Deduplication is using other software. DataDomain i think i saw mentioned. Where does this fit in with Netbackup and

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

2007-09-20 Thread Dave Markham
Has anyone got 6.5 yet? We are running NBU 5.0 MP7 on a predomintatly solaris platform. We are due to upgrade h/w and s/w and i was wondering was it worth going for 6.0 which seems to be used quite a bit by people now, or do we go to new 6.5 ? Also we have around 20 servers including a 2 node Sun

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

2007-09-20 Thread Dave Markham
when 7 comes out 6 will be no longer supported as i beleive NBU only goes 1 level back for support? Dave Justin Piszcz wrote: On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Dave Markham wrote: Has anyone got 6.5 yet? We are running NBU 5.0 MP7 on a predomintatly solaris platform. We are due to upgrade h/w and s/w

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 6 or 6.5

2007-09-20 Thread Dave Markham
which you can find here: http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290017.htm I couldn't put my finger on anything that talked about 6.0/6.5 end of support life, but would expect such a statement after the next major release. -Tim On 9/20/07, *Dave Markham* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 but with exclude list plus open file disabled

2007-08-15 Thread Dave Markham
having problems. Cheers Martin, Jonathan wrote: Tried this yet? http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/2004-June/023649.html Ah.. Old issues die hard. -J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Monday

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 14 but with exclude list plus open file disabled -NEW INFO

2007-08-15 Thread Dave Markham
://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/2004-June/023649.html Ah.. Old issues die hard. -J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:28 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas

[Veritas-bu] Status 14 but with exclude list plus open file disabled

2007-08-13 Thread Dave Markham
Strange problem i have posted about before where im getting a status 14 on a windows client. Master server is Solaris 9 running Netbackup 5.0mp7. I am getting status 14 on full backups and the error is a known problem :- WRN - Content Indexing Server: unable to pause catalog: Web (some files

[Veritas-bu] Strange Status 25 on connection

2007-07-26 Thread Dave Markham
Im having a very strange problem with Netbackup 5.0MP7 on Solaris connecting to a windows 2003 client. Couple of the windows clients have been upgraded to 2003 and after installing the client i cannot back them up and get status 25. Using the gui shows cannot connect on socket (Status 25). The

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange Status 25 on connection

2007-07-26 Thread Dave Markham
. Fix the DNS issue or add a entry to the host file and it should work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 9:42 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Strange Status

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpdbjobs -all_columns

2007-07-20 Thread Dave Markham
I haven't got a script but you may find this useful http://www.backupcentral.com/components/com_mambowiki/index.php/How_do_you_decipher_the_output_of_%22bpdbjobs_-report_-all_columns%22%3F Justin Piszcz wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Clooney, David wrote: Hi All Does anyone have some

[Veritas-bu] Status 52 but scratch available

2007-07-19 Thread Dave Markham
Netbackup 5.0Mp7 on Solaris9 servers with Solaris clients and Windows clients. Connected to L25 unit. Can anyone explain why i am getting all my jobs fail with status 52 yet i have scratch available? I run ITC so 2 drives are used at the same time. Now looking in

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 52 but scratch available

2007-07-19 Thread Dave Markham
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:52 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Status 52 but scratch available Netbackup 5.0Mp7 on Solaris9 servers with Solaris clients and Windows clients. Connected to L25 unit. Can anyone

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

2007-07-06 Thread Dave Markham
. regards, Phil Phil Weber Business Technology (Egg) Storage Technical Services - Senior UNIX Technologist Phone: 01384 26 4136 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: 05 July 2007 17:36 To: veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

2007-07-06 Thread Dave Markham
- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 July 2007 11:11 To: Weber, Philip Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update Thanks. Tried excluding *.wci and they are still behaving strangely. I haven't had this message

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

2007-07-06 Thread Dave Markham
, but has finished eventually (1 hour to do 2 gb) and resulted in a status 1. V. odd Was fine on mp4 :( Dave Markham wrote: Thanks. Sorry for not checking thoroughly got loads on atm :( Weber, Philip wrote: Exactly the symptoms we were getting. GUI -- master properties -- Client

[Veritas-bu] Windows client problem after MP7 update

2007-07-05 Thread Dave Markham
Guys i have just updated our Netbackup 5.0 environment to MP7. Master server is Solaris9. All stuff was fine with upgrade but now some of the windows clients dont seem to backup correctly. They get a portion of the way through and then this message appears and they grind to a halt until i cancel

[Veritas-bu] SAN Media server question

2007-06-26 Thread Dave Markham
Guys running Netbackup 5.0Mp7 on solaris 9 environment. I have a master server connected to L700 via fibre through a SANBOX2 switch to robot and 6 drives. The master server has 2 HBA's ( as i believe Sun impose a limit of 3 * LTO2 drives per 2GB HBA ). I have 2 SAN Media servers ( DB nodes )

[Veritas-bu] Identify drives in use

2007-06-05 Thread Dave Markham
Netbackup 5.0MP7 Solaris9 Anyone know how to identify from command line what drives are in use, or what tapes are in use while a job is running. We have an issue where ops keep opening the jukebox and changing tapes while jobs are running. The job is fine as the L700 library just suspends writes

Re: [Veritas-bu] Identify drives in use

2007-06-05 Thread Dave Markham
Justin Piszcz wrote: On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Dave Markham wrote: Netbackup 5.0MP7 Solaris9 Anyone know how to identify from command line what drives are in use, or what tapes are in use while a job is running. We have an issue where ops keep opening the jukebox and changing tapes while jobs

[Veritas-bu] bpstart_notify timeout

2007-06-04 Thread Dave Markham
Guys can you have a BPSTART_TIMEOUT directive in bp.conf on a per client basis? Reading the doc it just mentions it on the media server properties but i dont want it set globally. Netbackup 5.0MP7 Solaris kit. Cheers ___ Veritas-bu maillist -

[Veritas-bu] NBU 5 EOL

2007-01-12 Thread Dave Markham
Anyone know at all when Netbackup 5.0 will be end of life or end of support? I cant seem to find info on the site. Needle haystack and all that. cheers ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Running bpbkar32 from the command line

2007-01-10 Thread Dave Markham
Was there any response to the original question here? Im interested in testing network performance from a client using netbackup. Cheers Weber, Philip wrote: Bit of a problem if you've got icmp (and ftp, and...) disabled between most servers clients like we have. Is there anything similar

[Veritas-bu] Windows client hang on system_state

2007-01-04 Thread Dave Markham
Have any of you seen a windows 2000 client hang on this file? /System_State/Boot_Files/catalog/CATMAST.cbd Im running NBU 4.5mp6 ( i know i need to upgrade ) with the master being on solaris8 attached to an L25. Its just this client has now started to hang backups and it remains active forever

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows client hang on system_state

2007-01-04 Thread Dave Markham
Yeah the client just backs up local drives. I haven't tried the multiple streams on it yet, but i have tried disabling OTM and it now seems to be working. So...as im a unix engineer what is the importance of OTM running? I thought it was so it could backup open files. By disabling it does it mean

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multipathing San drives

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Markham
Thanks guys you have all confirmed what i have told the so called solution designer to be true and that multipathing tape devices isnt an option. Cheers Marion Hakanson wrote: On 12/4/2006 11:01 AM, Dave Markham wrote: Guys has anyone heard of trying to have resilient Tape drives over

Re: [Veritas-bu] help please

2006-12-05 Thread Dave Markham
otherwise. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:34 AM To: nizar motasim Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] help please To note Nizar the Netbackup volume pool

[Veritas-bu] Weird 52 error becuase it positions tape

2006-12-01 Thread Dave Markham
Netbackup 5.0mp4 on Solaris 9 attached to an L700. I have a media manager which is connected to shared drives running SSO on an L700. All drives are up and visible. I kick a job off and it finds tapes, puts them in and start to position them but then times out and gives status 52. I have tried

[Veritas-bu] Storage unit number of drives

2006-11-24 Thread Dave Markham
Guys is there anyway to create a storage unit and use only a certain number of drives? Im Netbackup 5.0mp4 on sol9. I have 5 drives available in a L700 3 of which are Shared SSO. I want to create a storage unit of 3 drives ( 1 shared and 2 not ) so that a network based job doesnt tie up 2 of the

[Veritas-bu] media destination full

2006-11-22 Thread Dave Markham
Netbackup 5.0mp4 Solaris9 connected to an L700 via fiber with 5 drives. (3 SSO with 2 media servers) Has anyone come across the below problem before and has a work around? One job seems to take over 24 hours for its full backup. We have plans in motion to get this machine added as with SSO but

[Veritas-bu] cinc and dinc on one tape

2006-11-13 Thread Dave Markham
Netbackup 5.0mp4 Solaris 9 environment with some win2k clients. Is it do people think to have diff incrementals and cumulative incrementals with the same retention on the same media? We have a network based backup which takes ages due to the amount of data on the machine. I have put a suggestion

[Veritas-bu] bpbkar null windows file

2006-11-09 Thread Dave Markham
Sorry for the strange topic. im trying to run a bpbkar32 -nocont ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES 1 null 2 null (or even c: instead of all_local_drives) on a windwos 2000 box with netbackup 4.5 client. Its very strange but it starts to create a file called 'null' which grows so i have to kil the process off.

Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: bpbkart on unix

2006-11-09 Thread Dave Markham
REQUIRED_INTERFACE = $interface Regards /Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: 07 November 2006 15:38 To: Carlos Alberto Lima dos santos Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: bpbkart

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpbkart on unix

2006-11-07 Thread Dave Markham
wrote: You can use the unix time command to measure how long a bpbkar to /dev/null takes (google bpbkar /dev/null and you should see the exact syntax). What do you mean by slow? How many MB/s are you getting? edson On 11/6/06, *Dave Markham* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpbkart on unix

2006-11-07 Thread Dave Markham
Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 November 2006 10:27 To: Edson Noboru Yamada Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] bpbkart on unix

Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: bpbkart on unix

2006-11-07 Thread Dave Markham
it´s not a network issue. Have you tested bpbkar to /dev/null on the client? How the client CPU behaves when you start a backup? tia On 11/7/06, *Dave Markham* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys checked the switch and all set to 100 full

[Veritas-bu] bpbkart on unix

2006-11-06 Thread Dave Markham
Anyone point me in the direction of a doc or technote on how to benchmark the bpbkar performance on a unix ( solaris ) client? I cant find anything. Only the windows one. Im having backup speed problems and want to rule out NBU. Strange thing is if i set the network to 100 mb , full duplex,

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to get SSO SAN Media Server LTO Drives back *without* rebooting ?

2006-11-06 Thread Dave Markham
Wasnt there something in the MediaMgr_DeviceConfig_Guilde in /usr/openv/volmgr about a system low on resaources may occasionally unload the st and sg drivers? If unix i think you can put forceload: drv/st and forceload: drv/sg into /etc/system on separate lines. Just a thought Sebastian

Re: [Veritas-bu] Query remote drives

2006-11-06 Thread Dave Markham
Try vmoprcmd -h media servers Also on each server try sgscan tape ( or sgscan all ) tpconfig -d Also look at vmdareq -display to see which has scan host Clooney, David wrote: Hi all Scenario Solaris 8 Master/media server 5.1 MP5 Multiple Windows media servers all 5.1 MP5 Quick

Re: [Veritas-bu] Creating a backup image for DR purpose

2006-11-03 Thread Dave Markham
You need other products for that. Veritas to baremetal restore for that purpose which bolts onto nbu quite nicely. actually i think its just a license component in 6.0 Hindle, Greg wrote: Solaris 9 nb 5.0 mp6 Is there something in netbackup that allows for an image to be created for a entire

[Veritas-bu] Strange speed problem...not the norm

2006-11-02 Thread Dave Markham
Has anyone seen this before? Netbackup 5.0 mp3 Solaris9 connected to L700 via fibre. I have a network client on a 100Mb network which is beyond slow backing up. Looking at the gui ( i know not accurate ) details for a job shows like 127kb/s. Doing an scp of a 128mb file from master server to

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange speed problem...not the norm

2006-11-02 Thread Dave Markham
Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 November 2006 12:20 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange speed problem...not the norm

2006-11-02 Thread Dave Markham
the client :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: 02 November 2006 14:59 To: WEAVER, Simon Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange speed problem...not the norm yeah all stuff set at 100 full

Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape not mounting

2006-10-27 Thread Dave Markham
- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 October 2006 12:14 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Tape not mounting Netbackup 4.5mp6 on Soalris 8. I have 2 LTO drives in my system but a backup just fails to mount a tape in the first drive and just downs

[Veritas-bu] Tape not mounting

2006-10-25 Thread Dave Markham
Netbackup 4.5mp6 on Soalris 8. I have 2 LTO drives in my system but a backup just fails to mount a tape in the first drive and just downs it. I have no idea why and cant see in the logs. I have log level set to 4 and have been looking in the bptm log but dont see anything obvious. There is

[Veritas-bu] Restore windows permissions

2006-10-04 Thread Dave Markham
Running Netbackup 5.0 mp6 on Solaris 9 with mixture of solaris, linux and windows clients. Does anyone know if its possible to restore file permissions without actually restoring the files themselves? Someone has tried setting permissions on 50gb of files over the network and it crashed loosing

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restore windows permissions

2006-10-04 Thread Dave Markham
) to only replicate the permissions. I'm not 100% sure this would even work, but I doubt NBU is going to restore file permissions only. -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dave Markham Sent: Wed 10/4/2006 5:33 AM To: veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Disaster Recovery Site

2006-08-01 Thread Dave Markham
I've done something similar which is adopted as a DR method by the customer. Its perhaps not as fancy as below but carries the same important feature. The master server at DR site is the same hostname as the Production site. This was critical in getting the DR process to work. All i do is backup

[Veritas-bu] Space left on Tape

2006-07-18 Thread Dave Markham
Dudes is there any way of saying how much space is left on a particular tape? I have had a look around but am a bit lost. Cheers Dave ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Space left on Tape

2006-07-18 Thread Dave Markham
bob944 wrote: Dudes is there any way of saying how much space is left on a particular tape? I have had a look around but am a bit lost. Yeah, run bpmedialist and compare with vmquery. That answer makes no sense. Dave, a tape holds as much as it holds, period. In contrast to

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6 and shell scripts question

2006-06-28 Thread Dave Markham
It does. And you may need to look in /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/goodies on the media/master to find them. Just copy them to the client in question and put commands in them. You can name them with .policy and .policy.schedule if you wish to isolate a certain start/end script for certain backup

Re: [Veritas-bu] Ports Question

2006-06-14 Thread Dave Markham
Assuming you have enabled VNETD correctly which i assume you have with having port 137824 open, try opening 13782 also. Cheers Brooks, Jason wrote: Hopefully and easy one, but I've been unable to verify as of yet. I'm working on backing up a pair of Linux boxes through a Cisco Load Balancer.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Total Data BACKED up in NetBackup

2006-06-12 Thread Dave Markham
Have you tried this :- bpimagelist -l -hoursago $hoursago | grep IMAGE | awk '{ tot+=$19} END { printf Data backed up in the last '$hoursago' hours: %9.0f '$size'\n,tot/'$div' }' $size is one of KB, MB or GB and $hoursago just substitute with the hours you want to go back. I have this in my

Re: [Veritas-bu] Total Data BACKED up in NetBackup

2006-06-12 Thread Dave Markham
else killme 1 No Valid size format passed to function totalsize fi bpimagelist -l -hoursago $hoursago | grep IMAGE | awk '{ tot+=$19} END { printf Data backed up in the last '$hoursago' hours: %9.0f '$size'\n,tot/'$div' }' } Dave Markham wrote: Have you tried

Re: [Veritas-bu] count of scratch tapes

2006-05-23 Thread Dave Markham
I use this script because it actually tells you the amount of scratch in the jukebox currently and not using the netbackup databases of what it thinks is in there. Hope its of use. You will just need to change the P1000 bit in the awk statement to match whatever string gets the path of your robot

Re: [Veritas-bu] URGENT AND HELP Quickest Way to Freeze Tapes

2006-05-12 Thread Dave Markham
If its all tapes in your robot id do something on command line for a loop. Off top of my head id do :- echo s s | /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/tldtest -r path to robot. e.g /dev/sg/c3t0l0 |awk '/Barcode/ {print $NF} |xargs bpmedia -freeze -m If that dont work take off the | xargs bpmedia -freeze -m

Re: [Veritas-bu] URGENT AND HELP Quickest Way to Freeze Tapes

2006-05-12 Thread Dave Markham
Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 May 2006 14:25 To: WEAVER, Simon Cc: 'veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Export and Import NetBackup configuration

2006-05-09 Thread Dave Markham
It is exactly what i do for a DR process. Only caveat is need to have the hostname of the backup server to be the same as its embedded into the catalogue and with different host names i couldnt get the robot and certain things to work correctly. Cheers WEAVER, Simon wrote: */Hi/* */what I

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup IRC Channel ...

2006-05-05 Thread Dave Markham
Id be interested in that definitely. There wasnt one last time i checked on efnet. Dave Barber, Layne (Contractor) wrote: Start one? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 09:47 To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] solaris off thread

2006-05-05 Thread Dave Markham
Thanks people. Have subscribed. Wilkinson, Alex wrote: 0n Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:13:54AM +0100, Dave Markham wrote: Sorry for the off topic message but does anyone know any solaris forums email or web which are free? http://www.sunmanagers.org/. Best Solaris mailing list

[Veritas-bu] solaris off thread

2006-05-03 Thread Dave Markham
Sorry for the off topic message but does anyone know any solaris forums email or web which are free? Got a real problem with multipathing mpxio not working and cant find a solution anywhere :( cheers ___ Veritas-bu maillist -

Re: [Veritas-bu] how to get a list of tapes in the tape library

2006-04-27 Thread Dave Markham
This script will get you the tapes in the jukebox for a particular volume pool. You will need to change the awk string where i search for P1000 to match what you robot is on an sgscan. The bit which just lists whats in the jukebox is echo s s | tldtest -r device path to robot #!/bin/sh #set -x

Re: [Veritas-bu] how to get a list of tapes in the tape library

2006-04-27 Thread Dave Markham
If you are going to use the below i suggest you do an inventory prior as this is what netbackup thinks is in the jukebox but ops could have been in and changed things around as they are unpredictable sorts ;) Inventory :- /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/vmupdate -x -rn 0 -rt tld -rh `uname -n` -vh `uname

Re: [Veritas-bu] RE: [Veritas-bu]Status 71...was: Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-27 Thread Dave Markham
Yeah i had come to that conclusion myself. The only worrying thing was i didn't want to leave it to chance that the raw partitions wouldn't appear on the client which didn't normally have them. Its all san storage connected see and if someone adds a new volume to the client with the same device

[Veritas-bu] exclude list

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Markham
Has anyone seen exclude lists not excluding files for raw partitions? I am running NB5.1 MP4 on solaris systems. I have a policy with a load of raw partitions in the form :- /backup/archive_log_bk /backup/control NEW_STREAM /u03 /u08

Re: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Markham
I am surprised by the number of people using a single volume pool for data backups. What about mixed retentions on media? The way i do things is like this :- Have a daily, weekly, monthly, offsite, logs tape pools ( as well as netbackup, and none obviously ) Now whatever the policy and file

Re: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Markham
) then have a full backup with a different retention than say a cumulative backup. Cheers bob944 wrote: Dave Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am surprised by the number of people using a single volume pool for data backups. What about mixed retentions on media? What about them? NetBackup

Re: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Markham
Agree. IMO simple for small to medium sized solutions is cumulative incremental backups daily and full backups at weekends and at month end with an offsite daily if required. This then defines sensibly you should have 4 different retentions.. dailys 1 to 2 weeks retention. Reason: whats the point

Re: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Markham
I know exactly how it works im afraid and was posing the question to people who use 1 tape pool. What about mixed retentions? To explain further i meant what about having different retentions on the same media which you would need to turn on in order to have full backups incremental etc to use

Re: [Veritas-bu] Volume Pools [recommendations please]

2006-04-26 Thread Dave Markham
Correct. Unless you have mix retentions on media set which i think everyone has agreed is a bad idea. Your description below uses 4 tapes ( if one tape per backup is used ) which are all associated to the same volume pool. IMO this is bad practice. I do think it explains it well to the person

Re: AW: [Veritas-bu] bpstart actions

2006-04-20 Thread Dave Markham
, Tennessee 37421 423-296-8200 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 5:57 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] bpstart actions Running Netbackup 5.1mp4 on solaris 9

[Veritas-bu] bpstart actions

2006-04-19 Thread Dave Markham
Running Netbackup 5.1mp4 on solaris 9. I need to get some start scripts to check things before my backup runs on a particular host. I was going to do this with bpstart_notify.policyname to check the status of a log file. If successfully then continue. Im wondering what to do if the status of

[Veritas-bu] drives showing UNKNOWN

2006-03-23 Thread Dave Markham
Netbackup 5.0 mp5s2 on solaris 8 connected to L1000 with 4 DLT7000 drives in. Has anyone seen it where robtest shows drive with barcode UNKNOWN, yet there are no tapes in the drive? Invoking robotic test utility: /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/tldtest -r /dev/sg/c3t0l0 -d1 /dev/rmt/0cbn -d2 /dev/rmt/1cbn

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpduplicate question

2006-03-23 Thread Dave Markham
The action i got from original post was that he duplicated to the wrong pool and wanted to correct it by removing the duplication and then duplicating to the correct pool. I took from this that he just wanted 1 duplication and so the copy number would be 2. Increasing the number of copies to 3

Re: [Veritas-bu] drives showing UNKNOWN

2006-03-23 Thread Dave Markham
moving the UNKNOWN tape from the drive using robtest? m d3 s?? ? I suspect that will work (and the library just wasnt able to read the barcode for these tapes). If it doesnt then you probably have a hardware fault. *Dave Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23/03

[Veritas-bu] Weird exclude behaviour

2006-03-15 Thread Dave Markham
Has anyone seen it before when you have something in an exclude list but it still attempts to back it up? This particular service is Solaris 8 running netbackup 5.0 mp5s2 mostly backing up solaris clients but with a few windows2000 clients. I keep getting status 1 for windows clients due to this

Re: [Veritas-bu] exclude, include query

2006-03-14 Thread Dave Markham
/logfile.txt That'd be efficient, anyway. -M (watch out for line-wrap above, my server does it without my permission) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 8:46 AM To: WEAVER, Simon Cc: veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] exclude, include query

2006-03-13 Thread Dave Markham
Guys im mailing on behalf of a colleague who works on the windows side of the fence. He asked me this question about netbackup but i wasnt too sure on how it would behave. He basically wants to backup *.trk and *.bak ( i think cant remember ) on a couple few drives. Now he cant put m:\*.trk and

Re: [Veritas-bu] exclude, include query

2006-03-13 Thread Dave Markham
if it works out perhaps? Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 March 2006 13:40 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

[Veritas-bu] backing up databases

2006-03-09 Thread Dave Markham
Ok, been tasked with giving my input on a backup solution for a new project. Someone had designed it to start backing up things using scripts from cron calling other scripts and then netbackup bpbackup commands and all sorts of random junk. Anyway assume we are talking Solaris 8 or 9 with fiber

Re: [Veritas-bu] robtest documentation?

2006-03-09 Thread Dave Markham
Barber, Layne (Contractor) wrote: * Starting robtest o robtest o 1 -- to select TLD 0 * Getting help o ? * Looking at contents of the tape drives o s d * Looking at the contents of the library o s s * Moving a tape

Re: [Veritas-bu] should you move live media to a new pool - thought it woudl fail

2006-03-06 Thread Dave Markham
I don't think you can change volume pools of a tape if it has images on it. It normally needs to be expired first, which of course will mean it can be re-used. Dave WEAVER, Simon wrote: Hi Could I get clarification? If I ran a Month end backup with a 1 year retention, but it accidently

[Veritas-bu] windows exclude

2006-02-09 Thread Dave Markham
I have the following in my exlude list for a windows client :- C:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\*.lock C:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\bprd.d\*.lock C:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\bpsched.d\*.lock C:\Program Files\VERITAS\Volmgr\misc\* c:\Temp c:\*\*\Local Settings\Temp

Re: [Veritas-bu] windows exclude

2006-02-09 Thread Dave Markham
correct version of the NBU PC Client software and/or MP ? Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 February 2006 12:14 To: veritas

Re: [Veritas-bu] performance?

2006-02-08 Thread Dave Markham
Have you set NET_BUFFER_SZ at all on the clients? It may try and increase the throughput buffer wise from client end where it was using standard values before. Dave Paul Keating wrote: I can add more GigE cards.matter of fact the box already has a dual GigE NIC installed. But I don't

Re: [Veritas-bu] performance?

2006-02-08 Thread Dave Markham
of the clients! Thanks Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2006 11:36 To: Paul Keating Cc: veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] duplication speed

2006-02-01 Thread Dave Markham
People i am moving an infrastructure from one site to the other. As part of this we are splitting things between different trucks for resilience. I performed a full backup of the infrastructure yesterday and today am duplicating it. I run solaris 8 Netbackup 5.0 mp5S2. I am slightly

Re: [Veritas-bu] duplication speed

2006-02-01 Thread Dave Markham
Wilts wrote: On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:14:25PM +, Dave Markham wrote: People i am moving an infrastructure from one site to the other. As part of this we are splitting things between different trucks for resilience. How long did this backup take? I am slightly concerned

[Veritas-bu] slow windows backup

2006-01-30 Thread Dave Markham
Im running Netbackup 5.0mp4 on solaris 8. Im getting really poor performance backing up 2 windows clients. Like 10k a second. I have been on them and the interfaces are set to 100/full which is correct. I am therefore a bit stuff as when i have seen slow performance before it has always been

Re: [Veritas-bu] drives going down on media servers

2006-01-24 Thread Dave Markham
/messages (Solaris) or the equivalent log ? Regards Michael On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:00:24 +, Dave Markham wrote I have 1 master server, and 2 media servers connected over fiber to an L700. Im not sure what the switch in the middle is as didnt install the system or have any info

Re: [Veritas-bu] Window file excludes

2006-01-19 Thread Dave Markham
Windows clients are a paint for excludes so as suggested i use a .reg file. As i deal with unix mostly i find it easier to ship a reg file around when i installed the windows client. Create your exclude list on a client through the gui or log onto the client ( however timbuktu/Terminal

<    1   2   3   >