___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Judy, do you have the W2K8 Windows Server Backup feature installed?
Regards.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:36 AM
To:
Steven,
This is very interesting and I am glad you shared. I just updated my
Windows Netbackup environment to 6.5.3 (from 6.5.1). I'll test this
out.
I have an issue with the automated Image Cleanup job ending with status
20.
Regards,
Steve
From:
I don't think my earlier note went through.
Try renaming the Netbackup.dll. The second link states this won't work
as you have to close the process keeping a handle open on the file but
renaming it has always worked for me.
http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-
I just applied 6.5.3 and received this error on one media server and
renaming the Netbackup.dll worked.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nardello, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 1:22 PM
To: Haskins, Steve; veritas-bu
Randy,
I opened a case on this to verify. I disable it on non-clustered clients but it
is required, as you know, on media servers.
Regards
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Samora
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:06 AM
To:
Randy,
I had a similar issue and ran the install again with repair option to
correct it.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy
Samora
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:16 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:
I concur with Ed. By default I don't exclude anything as I don't control
the applications and changes made to them and have found that covering
my back is most important. The issue does arise, as Ed mentioned, when
they add new drives in a cluster but I think that the new 6.5 client
addresses that
Boris,
I currently have Windows 2000 master server with six additional media
servers on a HP ESL9595 16 SDLT tape drive library and a HP MSL5052SL 4
SDLT tape drive library backing up 330+ Windows clients backing up 50TB
a week. I am at Netbackup 6.51. The master has four 733MHz processors
Hello,
Try renaming Netbackup.dll then re-run the installation.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dy018
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:09 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU6.5 Win Client
Yes, such as Netbackup.org or Netbackuporg.dll. This if your error
message also contains text stating to close Netbackup processes and try
again.
I have also discovered it best to use the local admin account as my
personal account gives an error since my home folder mapped drive
changed to a
I had to backout of 6.5.2A as PEM service would not start. After I
backed out of it on the master it could not connect to the media
servers; error 26.
Servers are Windows.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I had two media server I had to uninstall Netbackup completely and
reinstall when I recently went through this with rolling back 6.5.2A.
The other 12 media servers and the master went fine, thank goodness. I
removed master first as it seemed logical to me. I did not have to
deal with tape drive
and in hoping it fixes some of the minor issues I was
applying 6.5.2A for and everyone else's major issues.
Regards
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:42 PM
To: Haskins, Steve
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.2 6.5.2A
All; especially Windows Netbackup admins,
I upgraded my Windows test Netbackup 6.5.1 environment to 6.5.2 then
6.5.2A. Problem with 6.5.2 in Downing a drive in that it would down the
wrong drive. 6.5.2A no problem (test environment again).
I upgraded my production environment this past
All,
In Netbackup 4.5 through 5.1 you could copy the Netbackup
%installpath%\volmgr\database, %installpath%\Netbackup\var and
%installpath%\Netbackup\db\media folders for a media server off the
server and if the media server in question need rebuilt it would only
require the initial Netbackup
Sometime ago I posted a question on two error messages that I believe I
have discovered a fix. At least I have not experienced the errors again
for over 30 days.
I reran the 6.5.1 update with repair option.
The two errors:
The procedure entry point ovgetlocale could not be located in
I agree with verifying with the application support techs on what
files are being skipped and how to address them as they are responsible
for their applications but as the backup and operating system
administrator I am held accountable for recovery. I don't like exclude
lists especially if it is
And programming on punch cards...Oh, what FUN!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 6:50 PM
To: Jeff Lightner
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jim Horalek;
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re:
I too want to thank all for the feedback as it has made the manual
much clearer to me. I also apologize for apparently muddying the waters
that I did not intentionally mean to do and deter from Mr. Bergen's
original question.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have recently upgraded my test system to 6.5.1 from 5.1 and receive
the following in the event logs. Before I open a case has anyone run
across these and dealt with them. The logs are from the master on
Windows 2003 with SP2.
System log entry:
Description:
A service process other than the
CBergen,
You're not the only one that would like some enlightenment...I mean,
on synthetics backups. I don't understand why incrementals have to be
continuously run at all. As I understand it, that is the point of
synthetic backups as to have a full and just backup the changes from
that point
I concur that the underlying reason and thus the point of synthetic
backups is to shorten the backup window and reduce downtime and network
bandwidth utilization (at least after the first full is completed). We
disagree on what a true synthetic backup is and how it is implemented.
Regards
All,
Can a Full backup be set up using Flashbackup and then have a
different policy do differentials? I might be missing it but the type of
backup dictated from the client side as necessary to get the Flashbackup
to work would stop a normal backup from running, correct?
Regards.
Steve
I must be misunderstanding Flashbackups. I thought they were only Fulls.
Thanks.
From: Randy Samora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:09 PM
To: Haskins, Steve; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu
Also, in Netbackup if a job errors out and restarts on its own such as
from a 156 error and completes successfully the error is counted as a
failure even though it completed.
Do partial backups count against the success rate? We use SQL backup
utilities to backup SQL databases and as we don't use
All, in a class the instructor recommended setting it at 129 for
Windows.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
This will be the case, even when an Incremental is scheduled, when the
policy name is changed or a client put in to a different policy
altogether.
Regards
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Sent: Monday, September 24,
From this link you can select which version and what platform you
desire.
http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/support/downloads.jsp?pid=15143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
prodsacnetworking
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:12 AM
To:
Same here along with trans logs.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Spearman, David
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:50 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MS SQL 2005 Backups
I had to open case with Microsoft on this and NTBackup. My issue was
that SQL2000 has a bug in how it interacts with MDSEWriter within VSS.
They gave me a work around. If the database is SQL2000 install on a
separate partition from the system partition or logs and data are on
separate partitions
Hello,
In part to the question posed about validating the purchase of Aptare
and stating its benefits does anyone have experience with Aptare in
comparison to Netbackup 6.0 NOM that they could state reasons to favor
one over the other? Does anyone have comments about Symantec Backup
Reporter in
This a good suggestion as this has fixed various policy issues I have
had in the past and I have had Veritas support suggest this previously
upon a case being opened.
Regards.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wilkinson, Tim
Veritas support had me do this one time and it worked.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hindle,
Greg
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 6:37 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Odd Status
By raw backups are you referring to snapshots?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Carpe
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 2:33 PM
To: Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] RES: Block or
NBInstdlg cannot load resdll.dll
Has anyone resolved this error in trying to install the NB client on a
Windows server? The server is Windows 2000. It had 4.5 and I was trying
to update to 5.1MP5. Got 5.1 installed and the error started with MP5. I
have uninstalled the client (cleaned registry
When I have had this issue consistently on a client I resolved it by hard
coding the NIC's link speed instead of using Auto-negotiate. A single stream
issue though wouldn't seem to be the case with a NIC issue. Try disabling
Tracker on the client, this resolved many of my pesky random
I've been told by Veritas support to update clients to 5.x prior to
updating 6.0 because the rewrite of the system won't support 4.5 and
earlier. My experience after any update is if there are any issues with
a client after an update that updating the client resolves the issue
(then I only have to
You can have one scratch pool and still have scratch tapes in different
robots and the different robots still be able to access them as the
system knows what tapes are in what robot and which are scratch. I do it
and it works.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I feel your pain...
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 12:48 AM
To: Haskins, Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Curtis Preston
Cc: nizar motasim; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] help please
Whoops
I look forward to your email entries.
Think you could remind me how to generate a text file of a client list?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 12:01 AM
To: Haskins, Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Curtis Preston
Cc
I thought I'd throw in my two cents. I have in the past used the GUI to
delete media and change expiration dates. I then had a problematic
database indicating it couldn't expire media that didn't exist and had
to call in a case to get the database cleaned up. The support tech
informed me that
Title: Message
Check your multiplexing setting in the
policy. When I want more jobs to run concurrently to a tape drive I up the
number of maximum concurrent drives and maximum multiplexing drives for the STU
and then in the policy increase multiplexing accordingly.
From: [EMAIL
When I had this issue my two jobs did not
have the start window times set identically. When I adjusted both the monthly
and weekly start windows to match I no longer had the issue.
Thanks.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney, David
Sent:
Is the media server you are trying to use in the alternate client's list
of available media servers?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Janardhana Babu Donga
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:04 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: a
My application support person, if all of their wisdom, wants
to have their app server rebuilt but remove media server from it. Originally it
was made a media server coexisting with the app because of the TBs of data it
was to house. They want to keep the same host name for their app so I
I used two hostnames for a single media server and defined individual storage
units by NIC and it worked fine (removed the network bottleneck and moved it to
the processors) BUT when I upgraded to 4.5 FP6 they quit working with error 213
STU unavailable and I called support and was informed
Hello,
Has anyone
experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am running Netbackup
5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all Windows. I opened a case a
few years back and the resolution was to update the client to the same level as
the backend but in this case the
detail, I'm assuming it may me a
temp file that is reoccurringly regenerated by the application.
Rusty or Simon, What log would I look
in?
From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12,
2006 8:16 AMTo: Haskins, Steve;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE
In an open case I had support could only tell me of the bpminlicense
-verbose command.
Regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:26 PM
To: JAJA (Jamie Jamison)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
A lot of variables are induced into policy creation but on average I
have 10 clients per policy. Some have one and some have 40.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 7:31 AM
To: Koster, Phil
Cc:
Title: Message
Greg, Simon,
I couldnt agree more. Nothing
worse than a master server crash but at least when I experienced it I had a
catalog backup from that day to save my career.
Regards
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
Sent:
Title: Message
Bob,
I had the syndrome of device manager
doing down on my W2K3 media servers when I took the master down or rebooted the
master and it went away when I updated to MP5. I see you are at
MP4.
Regards.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Title: Message
KB913648
Regards
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006
11:06 PM
To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup
Shadow Copy Components:\
Is the client being backed up have numerous small files and/or a vsp
setting that is set at a minimum size? The clients I have that take
quite some time to actually start writing to backup media have a very
large amount of small files.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone experienced this application event log entry? I
have a W2K3 media server, the master is W2K. NB Enterprise 5.1 MP5. The media server is a HP
Storageworks 5026 with twp SDLT 160/320 tape drives with the NB SSO option. The
message doesnt reoccur from backup activity, cycling the
56 matches
Mail list logo
