I'm curious as to what model of the appliances you were looking at the
time... the older 5020/5220's or the newer 5230/5330's?
As for the NetBackup appliances not even being on the Gartner "magic
quadrant" list for backup dedupe appliances, I believe it's because of the
criteria they used: "Its ap
NBU Admin Console > Media and Device Management > Media
There is a "Data Expiration" column you can sort by. You can also
click/hold shift and highlight the tapes - doing so will give you a total
selected in the upper left hand corner.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:44 PM, BeDour, Wayne wrote:
> I
n you of anything, it would be to go ahead
and restore any catalog archives you made before migrating. This has been
the biggest headache so far. I really wanted to do this before we started
but for several reasons outside of my control that could not happen.
Joe
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:24 PM
The wording in the third bullet Rusty posted below isn't very clear. If you
re-write the "or" statement as two different bullets, it reads:
* If you upgrade to NetBackup 7.5.0.7, your upgrade path is to a release in
the NetBackup 7.6 maintenance line (triple-dot) available in the first half o
I don't have a script, but the vmoprcmd might be what you are looking for. It
is in {NetBackup install directory}/volmgr/bin. I am running Windows so I am
not sure of the capitalization.
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Int
-eq "2" ]
then
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bplabel -o -m $1 -d hcart -p Scratch
else exit 0
fi
_______
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Intersil Corporation
email: jinfant...@intersi
me] -ret 6 -force
bpmedialist -m [media_id]
I did verify both from the GUI (Reports -> Tape Reports -> Images On
Tape, and using bpimmedia -mediaid [media_id]) that all images on the
media have had their retention changed.
Any ideas?
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems
Everything is done by shortname.
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Intersil Corporation
email: jinfant...@intersil.com <mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com>
office: 321-724-7119
fax: 321-729-1186
www.inters
0.000%0.015 5.3M 3/19/12
08:06:23.182
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Intersil Corporation
email: jinfant...@intersil.com <mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com>
office: 321-724-7119
fax: 321-729-1186
www.i
things going. I then did a catalog
recover and the problem came back.
The problem exists when connected to the production network in the same
configuration as the old setup and also in the lab with the server
standalone.
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
The old system is still up as that was our fallback option.
We don't have a spare drive in our lab to use for a hot catalog backup
test, at least not yet. That was our next option, but we would need
downtime again to do the catalog backup/restore.
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Sec
It is a standard system build. I did the build and did not change
anything to do with DNS
Firewall is also turned off. I tried with the firewall service disabled
and after a reboot and the error still exists.
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
e was still there.
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Intersil Corporation
email: jinfant...@intersil.com <mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com>
office: 321-724-7119
fax: 321-729-1186
www.intersil.com
From:
ts:
bpclntcmd -pn = correct short name with 127.0.0.1
bpclntcmd -self = correct short name with 127.0.0.1
bpclntcmd -hn pbcobk01 = correct short name with 127.0.0.1
bpclntcmd -ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = correct host and xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for ip
address
If I do these test on the current server they come back wi
configs, thus the dedupe scenarios/savings/restore times will
differ significantly. Tricky.
Robyn
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Joe Eversole
mailto:joe_evers...@symantec.com>> wrote:
My name is Joe Eversole, and I'm a Symantec consultant. Although I'm not
speaking on behalf of t
7.1.0.2 has so many dedup fixes, are they putting the latest patch on, or
can you? Or are they only considered to be in a supported state for certain
releases? How does this work with NBU appliances? Anyone know? (not just Joe).
Robyn
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:02 AM, smpt
mailto:sm...@peppas.gr>
My name is Joe Eversole, and I'm a Symantec consultant. Although I'm not
speaking on behalf of the company, I'd like to help clarify some information
about the NetBackup appliances.
The 5000 and 5020 appliances are Deduplication storage appliances (PureDisk).
They require y
Howard,
At my last job we were doing the same thing and did NOT change any
system accounts used by NBU.
Backups and restores worked fine.
Thank you,
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Intersil Corporation
email
,
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Intersil Corporation
email: jinfant...@intersil.com
office: 321-724-7119
fax: 321-729-1186
www.intersil.com
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
.
BTW = we replaced 2 L700s (27 x LTO2) with 1 i500 (14 x LTO4)J
Thank you,
Joe Infantino
MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3
Senior Systems Analyst
Security and Server Operations
Intersil Corporation
email: jinfant...@intersil.com <mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com>
office: 321-724-7119
fa
Joseph Humenik
DTNM
Central Facility
(202) 691-7259
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
that creates these files, and the problem goes away if NB on
the master is stopped and these files are removed.
Support says it's a known issue but hasn't yet offered a solution... thought
someone here might have run into it.
Thanks,
Joe
___
ackup Admin Guide, Volume I.
On behalf of myself,
-- Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:54 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] What are these logs and how t
brary.
> If that is true, how can we avoide ?
> Your help is very much appreciated.
>
> THX
--
Joe Royer / Sr. SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may co
it a full or a prior incremental)
whereas the latter gets everything that changed since the last full.
--
Joe Royer / Sr. SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged a
ould have consisted of writing extremely large files
> consisting of nothing but the letter "e" to tape, without using
> encryption. Has anyone upgraded to LTO gen 4 yet who is also using the
> on-drive encryption and if so what kind of throughput do you see on
> average. Any r
AVR
> mode.
>
> Chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 10:56 AM
> To: Joe Royer; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] disable tld
>
> Do something that always tak
To answer my own question: kill tldd
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Joe Royer wrote:
> Is there a way to manually down tld0, thus forcing the library drives to
> AVR? I tried upoprbyname and that still put the drives in TLD.
>
> Today is not a good day. The robot is dead, and the vend
Is there a way to manually down tld0, thus forcing the library drives to AVR?
I tried upoprbyname and that still put the drives in TLD.
Today is not a good day. The robot is dead, and the vendor is having
"logistics issues" which means I have been waiting on a replacement part for 9
hours now.
Is it in an include list?
Joe Humenik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because e-mail can be altered electronically,
the integrity of this communication cannot be
guaranteed.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin
ROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
> Royer
> Sent: 10 July 2007 15:49
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Catalog performence to tape
>
> I have gone a few rounds with this issue myself, and here is what I
> learned:
> - Cat
-disk "RAID-10" to RAID-5. Once this was complete, I had acceptible
speeds again (above the minimum 10MB/s for my HP LTO2 drives).
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain
Celerra
documentation, it says to disable reserve / release if doing dynamic
drive sharing in ARCServe and CommVault, I'm wondering if NBU would be
similar?
EMC and the robot vendor both say to turn SCSI reserve / release off,
Veritas says to leave it on; anyone out there with any experience w
s, once for OS and
one for /opt/openv/.
The V240 has MORE than ample PCI IO for that amount of data, but if the
T2000 is cheaper, I'd go that way.
If/when you eventually need more performance for the catalog, you can
put it on FC-SAN disk, or an external FC array.
Paul
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin
2TB.
What I have in mind;
Sun Fire Platform (not sure on spec)
Quantum / Adic Scalar i500 with 2 x LTO-3 drives (SCSI)
A staging platform (a NAS device possibly, Quantum Snap server or along
those lines, something compatible with NetBackup before spooling off to
tape)
Any recommendations on the above
exactly why it failed.
>
> This maybe a problem fixed in NB 5.1MP6 The work around it to creating
> touch file:
> /usr/openv/netbackup/NOSHMDUP
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
> Royer
> Sent: Thursday,
ed out connecting to client (54).
01:01:36 INF - Duplicate of backup id netapp01_1177753767 failed, timed
out connecting to client (54).
TIA
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain
MP4 development cycle. Continue working with support and
escalate the case if you need to. Obviously orphan images are a bug and
they're supposed to be cleaned up automatically.
.../Ed
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attac
ot; systems look like the ultimate netbackup
boxes. Just add fibre, disk, and tape.. T2000 for master, T1000's
for medias...They are all optimized for IO and multiple
threads/processes. Quad GigE onboard, 32GB RAM max...
Austin
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 5
bytes\, it
is not a multiple of 512
How do I get it to use the NDMP drives to duplicate?
TIA
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged and confidentia
casionally
theres an "unable to lock media offset" something error but the rest all
looks ok.
Dave
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privilege
age still lives in the catalogs.
>
> At least this might help you clean up your storage temporarily. As to
> the source of the problem, I'd love to know if that is a bug.
>
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
> Xinupro, LLC
> 617-834-2352
>
>
>
&
0:39 -0600
From: "Powers, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading 5.1 mp4 to mp5
Should be straight forward I assume. Anyone run into any issues?
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for th
it.
Help? I don't particularly want to delete it from the DSSU.
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader
of the
our RMAN script to run a different
command based on some sort of system input / variable?! Anyhow, we're
upgrading to 6.0 here in the next month or two and I'm going to have to
tackle this problem then.
-Jonathan
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This mes
l or vault) and pick "duplication" as the
destination storage unit.
See if things speed up.
Bobby Williams
2205 Peterson Drive
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421
423-296-8200
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for t
It looks like the number of seconds since the UNIX epoch time of January
1, 1970.
Joe Humenik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because e-mail can be altered electronically,
the integrity of this communication cannot be
guaranteed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
FERS x MPX x Number of drives = 6 GB.
However, using linux top command, we see a plenty of free memory (5 or
6GB),no matter how many jobs are running.
btpm complains also that it?s waiting for empty buffers.
Am I doing something wrong?
TIA
------ next part --
--
Joe R
ack up is a NDMP device, and if I try
to create a NDMP storage unit, the Linux media server isn't even
available.
So, it seems that I'm missing something. Suggestions while I go off and
dig through the Nix Admin Guide?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 51
Title: Have to get rid of STK L180
Hi Cheryl
I would try to sell it.
The easy way is to contact a brooker eg www.epoka.com (that company I know and they
are ok)
By the way, the L180 is one of the best tapelibraries you
can get and I wouldn't trade ours for anything else the an L700e og L14
am unable to get more speed.
The library is L100 and I am using two drives for backup. By increasing
number of drives or number of channels the backup speed is not going to
be better.
The tunning I have made so far is.
NET_BUFFER_SZ as 262144
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS=64
SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS=104
because
sometimes it is I. :-) I was thinking of maybe using a cron job to
de-activate the specific policies at 8AM and another cron job to
reactivate at 6PM. Is there a simpler way?
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only fo
dministrator
> Work: 01283 502522
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader
of
r non-ndmp backups to go to LTO3 drives as well. My questions
> are this:
>
> What settings need to be changed and to what to minimize LTO3 show
> shining?
>
> How can I tell if my drives are show shining? Where do I look, what
> commands do I need to run etc.?
--
Joe Royer /
ual Core Xeon
> 5060s w/ 2x2MB Cache, 3.2Ghz, 1066Mhz FSB on a Dell Power Edge 2950 w/
> 4GB RAM. I originally spec'd two processors (two dual cores) which I'm
> certain will be quite powerful enough to drive 4 Gigabit nics to disk
> over fiber. But how important is it, and ca
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
The drive limit of LTO2, I have benchmarked at speeds of 90-94MB/s,
sustained. Around 137-138MB/s for LTO3.
Justin.
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
T
with scripts rather than DSSU. i.e. back
up to disk overnight & then split a mirror off (to somewhere where its
I/O will be separate) and duplicate off this during the day before
resynching. Anybody do anything like that? I can see all sorts of
nasty gotchas ... maybe that way madness lies?
, Andrew Sydelko wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:58:38 -0500 (CDT)
> Joe Royer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Forgive me if this has been asked before, I'm a bit behind on reading
>> the list.
>>
>> How do you keep your LTO3 drives spinning fast enoug
ternal RAID-10 can barely hit 27MB/s
reliably doing OS backups, but my DSSU is on SATA SAN drives and hard
to measure.
Thanks!
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain informati
sically in one
robot with robot control on the (linux) master. Will any of this
require an SSO license?
I'm reading the manuals, but I'm hoping you guys will be faster.
Thanks!
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended
Looks like Remote NDMP is not supported on Linux. I just looked at the
compatibility matrix and all the linux NDMP patches, nowhere does it say
support was added for linux server. Someone please correct me if I'm
wrong.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Joe Royer wrote:
> Actually I was hoping
ct to the filer
>
> Run:
> $ set_NDMP_attr -probe
> ...to get a listing of your configured drives.
>
> Add a drive to Netbackup using filername:nrst#a appropriate for your
> drive config..
>
> Configure a STU on the master with the name of the NDMP host.
> Note: I was runn
ut I have never done NDMP from scratch, and of course
now it's urgent.
Thanks!
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the
43
> Gsm: +90 0532 409 80 46
>
> Adress: Cumhuriyet Cad. Yeni Parseller Sk. No: 20 B Blok Kat:4-5
> 34805 Kavacik / ?stanbul
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Joe Royer / SysAdmin / Digital Motorworks / 512-692-1028
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t
I used the SPS client for SPS 2001 on
5.1.
What I did was basicly just backup
everything.
Thank God never had to restore
anything.
SPS 2003 isn't supported under NBU 5.1. Support for SPS
2003 is in NBU 6.0
/johnny
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shyam
H
Title: media position error(86)
Reasons could be many, but first thing to try is to
clean the tapedrives.
It could also be a media or tapedrive
problem.
Do you get the error on more then one
tapedrive/media?
/johnny
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coen,
Title: Message
Hi Simon
I have an old listprice from the end of 2004 and that
was USD 1.125 per Windows client.
But don't spend any money, time or energy om IDR. It is
a dead end. IDR is not and will not be supported under NBU 6.0 or
later.
MBR is the way of the future.
And if you have to
nd =
not =3D
always the same type of job (mostly SQL, but sometimes filesets or =
=3D
shadow copies). We've power-cycled the master and media servers a =
=3D
couple of times, and that isn't fixing the issue. =3D20
If anyone could shed some light on this for us
I can't tell you if it will work on NBU 6.0, but it should.
Windows 2003 Server X64 is supported in NBU 6.0 MP2. Before that there was not
support.
I have a few Windows 2003 Server X64 in production on Intel EMT64 and after I
got the MP2 client I haven't had problems.
/johnny
-Original M
69 matches
Mail list logo
