We're in the process of moving from our 4.5FP8 system to 6.0MP1
(everythin new). The major problem we're seeing, are ERROR 41's as
we start "loading up" the media servers. These would occur in
batches and appear on the more heavily loaded media server.
Any 6.0 environments out there experiencing t
Can any of these tools monitor for restore tape mounts, *AND*
display a list of any additional tapes (with it's Volume
Group if it's not in the library) required ?
/Steve
---
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, King, Cheryl wrote:
> That's what OpenView Operations (OVO) does. You run an agent on the
> NetBack
Hi,
Does the 4.5 FP8 client work on Solaris 10 ?
/Steve
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Are there any local backup type groups in the Toronto, Canada area for
poor folks like me who can't travel ? :)
/Steve
---
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Paul Keating wrote:
> Sounds like we've got some of the same interests..though I'm less
> interested in the 5.x stream as we hope to be on 6.x by en
Hi,
Sure, I'd be interested.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Ray Schafer wrote:
> I could set up a Webcast and go through an overview of BMR 6.0 -
> actually running through how to set it up and configure it, and then
> demonstrate some of the features including the configuration editor
> (used
Hi,
We're evaluating Aptare's Storage Console on our NetBackup 6.0 MP1 system.
One of the commands that it requires is, the output of bpdbjobs -report
-all_columns, which takes a very long time to complete (over 6 minutes).
This is with only around 800 jobs (per the activity monitor).
/Steve
We experienced a general "hang" of NetBackup on two seperate occcasions
(jobs active but no activity and no jobs queued, even for manual
submissions). Running nbpemreq would also hang. We were sent these
binaries after we'd reported this problem last night.
/Steve
---
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Ed Wilts
Hi Justin,
Is the data coming directly from a SAN (vs network) or direct attach ?
Thanks,
/Steve
---
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> This is on an HP shelf connected via
>
> 06:01.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
> Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev
The latest nbpem binary we got (last night) seems to have corrrected our
"scheduling" problem. We'll be monitoring for the next couple of days.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:00:00AM +1000, Wilkinson, Tim wrote:
> > It may be an obvious question but I
Yep, was surprised by this behaviour a few months ago (and we're not using
SSO). Fix wa sto include, "DISALLOW_NONNDMP_ON_NDMP_DRIVE" in vm.conf.
/Steve
---
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Paul Keating wrote:
> Anyone ever seen anything like this before?
>
> I started a restore job for a client that had been
Take a look at doc 231959 (for versions lower than 6.0), nbemmcmd is used
for NBU6.0
/Steve
---
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Paul Keating wrote:
> Very cool.
>
> So just add that line to the vm.conf and bounce the daemons?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> --
>
>
> > ---
I'm surprised about the "locked in" comment. Can you explain ?
We were a Legato NetWorker shop that was persuaded to go the Veritas NetBackup
route because of their pricing. Seems that they've gotten more expensive and
our
experience since NetBackup 6.0 didn't help either. Other backup vendors
ou received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
Steve Quan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/01/2008 03:53 PM
To
Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu, "BeDour, Wayne" <[EMAIL PR
Hi,
I see this as well. I believe that's normal behaviour as the check for the
high water mark is done before it starts writing the image.
/Steve
--
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Say you have 4 clients, each have 10TiB of data on them.
> For disk staging you only have 1TiB on each
We've found that if the files are within nested directories, DAR is
disabled, even if we choose ALL the files.
/Steve
---
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Marianne Van Den Berg wrote:
> We got 'caught' by the same thing - found this in the NDMP Admin Guide:
>
>
>
>
> Note File-level DAR is supported; direct
We noticed that on the "new" unix clients as well. They've added an rc
script (nbclient) for BMR and the san client.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
> Guys
> I got clients that are SAN Attached client, but NetBackup is starting a
> Service that is always failing on
It'll be interesting to see how other sites are using LiveUpdate for Unix
and WinX clients. Also any positive/negatives would be appreciated.
/Steve
---
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Karl Rossing wrote:
> Thanks Rob!
>
> I managed to get it going by simply following Renee's instructions.
> http://mailman
We had this one for the LONGEST while :(
/Steve
---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Jerry wrote:
> Not sure if any of you have been burned by this one,
> but it surprised me today.
>
> http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/281780.htm
>
> I found out that random fulls had been skipped for
> months on my n
Is there a newsgroup/forum I can go to for tips/hints on how others are
using Aptare with NetBackup ?
Thanks,
/Steve
--
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Hindle, Greg wrote:
> Ok Thanks. This is a Aptare thing. Good I am trying to convince my
> management here to buy this product.
>
>
> Greg
>
<<>>
_
I've noticed the error 200's Fortunately, they stopped after a few days.
/Steve
---
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ever since we upgraded to Netbackup 6.0MP4 on March 12 , we have started
> seeing alot of what I call false "50" errors.
> ( we usually get these when we stop service
Hi,
We've been "wrestling" with this for quite some time, and very curious to
see how other sites are managing their Lotus Notes backups. We're running
NBU6.0 MP4 (servers and clients). The database is just over 1TB and we do
transaction log backups.
Thanks,
/Steve
We're running Solaris10 on our media servers (for about 3 weeks now).
/Steve
---
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Kenneth W Wilkinson wrote:
> Anybody running Solaris 10 and NB6.0? Any issues you see with it?
>
>
>
> kww
>
>
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@
aphores.
These are just a few issues I found in Sol8 after servers were in
production for months.everything worked fine till one fine day when
our load gradually, and unexpectedly crossed some random boundary.
Paul
Also contemplating Linux on Sun X-series hardware
--
-Original Message
We did this (Solaris8 to Solaris10 media servers).
/Steve
---
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Quick question,
>
> With NBU6.0MP4, since all is held on the master server, I can simply take
> a media server out of service, re-format it, install RHEL5 and either
> unpack/setup everything
I ran a clean install and specified the name of the master server per the
prompts, installed/configured the sg driver and tape drives, then applied
MP4, and restarted everything (master and all media servers :)
/Steve
---
<<>>
>
> Any unforseen issues or it went smoothly for you?
> ___
/Steve
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Martin, Jonathan wrote:
> I stand corrected. Curtis has all the answers and he's sitting on them.
> =P
>
> Worrying about multiplexing settings and tape failures? Come on, that's
> about as soft a cost as you can dream up.
>
> -Jonathan
>
> -Original Message---
more
> detail how you do VSS or I can see you do the array based solution with
> local copy cloning, correct?
>
> Does anybody do transactional log backups for Domino Notes? Any pros and
> cons?
>
> Curtis? maybe you can get back on this one.
>
> Thank you,
> Bor
This is also a BIG issue with us (over a terabyte). We'd hoped that doing
incrementals through transaction log backups would help (with the added
bonus of "point in time" restores), but that unfortunately, didn't help.
/Steve
---
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Bobby R Windle wrote:
> Any one have any crea
as wondering if anybody does it at all.
>
> Thank you,
> Boris
>
> On 11/1/07, Steve Quan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is also a BIG issue with us (over a terabyte). We'd hoped that doing
>> incrementals through transaction log backups wo
I second this request :) I see the occasional traffic, but it's mostly
about how great the product is :) :)
A similar format to this list would be nice.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, X_S wrote:
>
> does anyone know of an aptare forum out there? i am a new user to aptare and
> it would be nic
We have about 650.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Nardello, John wrote:
> Since you've brought this to mind then, anyone want to reveal the
> largest number of clients they're reporting on through Aptare ? Just
> curious if some of our Aptare slowness is due to the several thousand
> clients we r
Hi,
Does anyone have an Aptare tutorial for newbies ? From the comments on
this list, I get the impression that it's very easy to use, however, I
seem to be having a tough time with it :(
Thanks,
/Steve
---
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, X_S wrote:
>
> we started not too long ago with Aptare. so far thin
I remember seeing comments about the advantages/disadvantages of a few
vendors' implementation of data deduplication but I can't find it :(
I'd appreciate comments from sites that have evaluated this.
Thanks,
/Steve
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-b
Is anyone using ZFS for this ?
/Steve
--
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Jeff Lightner wrote:
> I second Ed's recommendation of Veritas Volume Manager (VxVM). Not
> just for NetBackup but for most filesystems (including those for
>> terabyte databases). The options one has for controlling things such
> a
We have Solaris10 master & media servers here without any changes to
/etc/system but I'm also interested in what others are doing.
/Steve
---
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Dave Markham wrote:
> I'd be interested in this too, as i'd heard you didnt need to bother
> with /etc/system tuning in Solaris 10.
>
Sure,
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS 64
SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS 262144
/Steve
---
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, NBU wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
> Can you share what is the Number / Size of data buffers set in your
> environment.
>
> +--
> |This was se
What seems to "stick out", is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS)
and the problem only shows up after a "good" catalog restore
/Steve
---
> From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.e
2nd outage for
another cold catalog or finding an LTO drive to test with. -Jonathan From:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Quan
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:54 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veri
Before the catalog restore, did your master see itself as a FQDN
(pbcobk01.intersil.com vs short name of PBCOBK01) ? Do you use the FQDN when
the master/media servers are registered ?
/Steve
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:21:07 -0400
Fro
Per the following (high-lighted), it appears that NBU cannot determine the
"backup file specs" ... Can we see what the filer logs show when this occurs ?
+++
1. Enable NDMP Debug Logging on the NetApp Filer by running the following
commands on the Filer:ndmpd debug screenndmpd debug 702. Recre
Any indications from the lights on the tapedrive before it's reseated ? Can you
get logs from the library ?
/Steve
> From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 72, Issue 7
> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:00:02 -0500
>
>
It will be interesting to see how many sites here are using LTO5 drives, and
what their experience has been so far. With the greater throughput, are you
using morepowerful media servers ? Is there a way of using LTFS with NBU ?
/Steve
Per the information, it appears to be media server related ...---NetBackup
status code: 10Message: allocation failedExplanation: The system memory
allocation fails because of insufficient system memory available. A possible
cause is that the system is overloaded with too many processes and not
Sounds like the firewall (ipfilter ?) or tcpd (inetd) is blocking port 13782
from your master/media server(s). From your master, can you sucessfully telnet
using port 13782, to the Solaris10 client ? You mention telnet from the master
below, but just verifying that you used the bpcd port#.
/
This technote appears to match what you describe,
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH164532&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1341160999890
Taking a look at the client bpcd log should also provide additional info if the
above technote isn't amatch.
/Stev
How are your tape storage units configured (just 1 for the 2 drives) ? Does the
queuing (for the allocated tape drive) happen only for the 6th job/class ?
/Steve
--
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 10:12:46 +0200
> From: "Hagman, Rob"
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Job is waiting on a bu
Can you turn on verbose logging on the affected filer and see what the logs say
? Also, from the filer, can you mount/rewind/etc a tape ? I'm curious about
this NBU msg: "
Device serial number for device at path /dev/nrst1a does not match drive
adic_drv03
/Steve
<<>>
>
> we have a netbac
I would have expected NBU to *keep* the info about the full backup until the
subsequent differentials/incrementals have expired, however, I believe that NBU
would determine that the "cleaned out" files from it's DB (expired) have not
been backed up, and include them in a subsequent incremental,
Thanks guys (Jeff and Joseph) ... what you say regarding the restores make
sense. I suppose I went off on a tangent as this discussion reminded me of a
similar incident. We were surprised about the unexpected size of a client's
incrementals, and later discovered that the full had expired (befor
Speaking of "reimport", I've always found it a "chore" to find the media
containing expired images. I remember it being very easy in NetWorker (Legato)
as it was simply a matter of running a query of the backup which ID'ed the
media, then performing the required import. How does one do "query"
For the sites that have gone completely to disk, did you have to make
adjustments to your retention period(s) ? I'm also curious on how you're
handling your archival requirements ...
Thanks,
/Steve
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date:
51 matches
Mail list logo