I know I've been gone for a while, but I was surprised to see the
archives stopped in 2016.
Did something happen I don't know about?
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Nope. You verified what I believed to be the case. Although the
documentation suggests otherwise, and something that the original poster is
experiencing does as well, it's nice to see that it works as I thought it
should -- at least somewhere. ;)
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From:
And you're verifying that the original full does not need to be kept around?
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Crowey
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 5:55 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
To each his own, of course, but I believe the one client per policy setup is
actually just as easy, if not easier to manage than the multiple clients per
policy type. I laid out my reasoning for this a while back:
http://www.backupcentral.com/content/view/51/47/
-Original Message-
If you're using the VTL, all you really have to do is re-label the tapes in
NBU after they're expired. That tells DD that it can erase the rest of
what's on the tape. That's the case with any VTL.
If you're using the file interface, it deletes the files for you when they
expire.
_
Actually, TOP said he had backed up to an EDL/3DL (EMC Quantum box).
Jeff (Kaplan),
Is it possible to use tape shadowing on the replicated system, so that the
backup to one virtual tape, replicate to another virtual tape, then eject
that virtual tape to create a physical tape?
You make some good points, Bob.
-Original Message-
From: bob944 [mailto:bob...@attglobal.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 6:47 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: wcplis...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] How to properly calculate the Catalog
That formula in the manual
Todd,
That formula in the manual is completely worthless. I can't believe they
still publish it. The SIZE of the data you're backing up has NOTHING to do
with the size of the index. What matters is the number of files or objects.
I could backup a 200 TB database with a smaller NBU
If you ask me, you should be considering the OST interface, not the VTL
interface. It will give you a bigger boost in performance than the VTL
interface will, from what they've been publishing lately.
In addition, in a few months, OST will support copying to tape via OST.
You'll get better
I guess my question is to question the requirement to do this. I've never
been a fan of special backups going to special tapes. I'm relatively OK
with segregating backups (e.g. Oracle on its own tapes, etc), but who cares
what backups go to what tapes? Just let NBU put it on whatever tape it
Good point.
-Original Message-
From: Donaldson, Mark [mailto:mark.donald...@staples.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 9:28 AM
To: W. Curtis Preston; Justin Piszcz; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Multiple Master for Single Client
Note: Anything initiated
And IMHO, anyone with a retention policy should also have a relabeling
policy. When a tape goes into scratch, you should have a script relabel it.
If you do this on a regular basis, you're protected. If all you do is
expire it without relabeling it, a savvy plaintiff could ask you to
re-import
Agreed. Simply relabeling the tape puts a EOD (END OF DATA) mark after the
label. Every expert I've ever talking to says that getting past that is
impossible. Therefore, my TECHNICAL opinion is that relabeling a tape falls
under the 'reasonable man' standard for making sure a tape is unreadable
I prefer the format of the search at http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2 , but
I may biased. :)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Nardello, John john.narde...@wamu.net
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:46:10
To: Randy Samorarandy.sam...@stewart.com;
14 matches
Mail list logo
