Thats potentially a lot of email. What do you do with that email? Does
a human read it?
--
tim burlowski
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:01 AM, smpt wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using blat, but not nbmail.cmd
> I have custom scripts that run with "at" or netbackup scheduler and I ha
the list or if you prefer feel free to email me directly.
Thanks for your feedback. If you have more ideas for improvements to
NetBackup be sure and add them to the Ideas portal
http://www.symantec.com/connect/ideas
--
tim burlowski
Product Manager
Not at this time. We are looking into the feasibility of adding this.
--
tim burlowski
tim_burlow...@symantec.com
Product Manager
Symantec
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:13 PM, David Stanaway wrote:
> Is it possible to get a NOM alert whenever a job goes into incomplete
> status?
ails are at the link below - you have to tweet your reply on twitter to
win.
http://bit.ly/sflVW
--
tim burlowski
Product Manager
Symantec
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Yes we are actively reading and reviewing it.
--
tim burlowski
2009/9/11 Justin Piszcz
> Wow what a nice find! Hopefully the Symantec folks are actively reading
> this :)
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>
> On Friday 11 September 2009 08:00:03 a
.
1. Long lists should be sorted and filtered.
2. Input boxes should support type-a-head where the user starts entering the
host name and a drop down appears with the matching hosts.
thanks,
--
tim burlowski
Product Manager
Symantec
2009/9/10 WEAVER, Simon (external)
> Jorge !
> That
One last try.
The last sentence should read "The net result of reading the footnotes
indicates that there will be one 32 bit NetBackup server platform, Windows
2003 x86-32".
Thanks Ed!
--
tim burlowski
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:22 PM, tim burlowski wrote:
> That last sentenc
That last sentence should read "one 32 bit NetBackup server platform,
Windows 2003 x86-64."
--
tim burlowski
http://timbu.org/mtblog
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:15 PM, tim burlowski wrote:
> All:
>
>
> I wanted to chime in on this conversation and take the time to mention
,
--
tim burlowski
Symantec Product Management
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:11 AM, wrote:
> Hello there,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your response guys !
>
>
>
> My master is running in Windows 2003 32 bit operating system with 8 GB RAM.
>
>
>
> Is my master util
statements, one should not use them to make buying
decisions.)
--
tim burlowski
Product ManagerSymantec
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, wrote:
> I don't think it will. NOM 6.5.4 introduces the concept of a read-only
> user. However NOM has no mechanism that I've seen to l
something like this.
My de-duping VTL doesn't know know how to de-dupe an MPX image, therefore I
want to stop MPX'ing. In order to still perform my backups in a reasonable
amount of time, I need 180+ drives.
Is that the situation you are facing?
--
tim burlowski
Product Manager
Syman
I am not sure about the license side of the equation, but 128 drives is the
limit.
Are you able to keep 128 drives, virtual or otherwise, streaming data at a
reasonable rate on this linux server?
--
tim burlowski
Product Manager
Symantec
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Wyder Peter wrote
et us know what you think.
--
tim burlowski
Technical Product Manager
Symantec
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
line" because it is most often interpreted as a state
where action needs to be taken. If your cluster management software
said that a service group was "partially online" you would want to
take action and quickly. I'm working with engineering to make this
distinction crisper
ently. If someone from engineering sees your
question and knows the answer, it should be more likely that she or he
will chime in with an answer. If you have any feedback on our
participation let me know.
thanks,
--
tim burlowski
Technical Product Manager
Symantec
https://forums.symantec.com/s
resolution in some cases.
If you find this kind of openness helpful please let us know by either
responding here or leaving a comment on the blog.
thanks,
--
Tim Burlowski
Technical Product Manager
Symantec
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@ma
on't like cross posting, so didn't think I should include
the whole post in this email thread, I suppose I could be convinced
otherwise.
Please comment on the blog or here in this thread if you have any
additional questions on this topic that you would like me to try and
answer on the blo
d. Any review or
> distribution by others is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
> notified that any use
> of this information or data by any other person is absolutely prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
I posted a summary of the survey results on the NetBackup blog.Thanks
to the twenty nine people sent in responses.
https://forums.symantec.com/syment/blog/article?message.uid=298198
tim
On Jan 26, 2008 6:34 AM, tim burlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who has res
Thanks to everyone who has responded so far. If you want to weigh in
on the topic, I'll keep the poll open for four more days.
thanks,
tim
On Jan 23, 2008 11:08 PM, tim burlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote this for thread of the month.
>
> Since there was so much
t way with hundreds of clients?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Randy Samora
>
> Team Lead - Enterprise Backup & Recovery
>
> Enterprise Server and Storage Systems
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Mobile: 713.256.8224
>
> Offi
way to get the report for all policies
> (approximately 865). Please help me.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Asiye Yigit
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
