Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Blat

Thats potentially a lot of email. What do you do with that email? Does a human read it? -- tim burlowski On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:01 AM, smpt sm...@peppas.gr wrote: Hi, I'm using blat, but not nbmail.cmd I have custom scripts that run with at or netbackup scheduler and I have put

Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM alerts for incomplete jobs?

Not at this time. We are looking into the feasibility of adding this. -- tim burlowski tim_burlow...@symantec.com Product Manager Symantec On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:13 PM, David Stanaway da...@stanaway.net wrote: Is it possible to get a NOM alert whenever a job goes into incomplete status

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Blat

or if you prefer feel free to email me directly. Thanks for your feedback. If you have more ideas for improvements to NetBackup be sure and add them to the Ideas portal http://www.symantec.com/connect/ideas -- tim burlowski Product Manager Symantec

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup contest

are at the link below - you have to tweet your reply on twitter to win. http://bit.ly/sflVW -- tim burlowski Product Manager Symantec ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Annoying Thing (Unsorted List)

. 1. Long lists should be sorted and filtered. 2. Input boxes should support type-a-head where the user starts entering the host name and a drop down appears with the matching hosts. thanks, -- tim burlowski Product Manager Symantec 2009/9/10 WEAVER, Simon (external) simon.wea

Re: [Veritas-bu] Annoying Thing (Unsorted List)

Yes we are actively reading and reviewing it. -- tim burlowski 2009/9/11 Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com Wow what a nice find! Hopefully the Symantec folks are actively reading this :) On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Jorge Fábregas wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 08:00:03 am tim

Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ?

, -- tim burlowski Symantec Product Management On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:11 AM, karthikeyan.sunda...@cognizant.com wrote: Hello there, Thanks a lot for your response guys ! My master is running in Windows 2003 32 bit operating system with 8 GB RAM. Is my master utilizing this full 8GB

Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ?

That last sentence should read one 32 bit NetBackup server platform, Windows 2003 x86-64. -- tim burlowski http://timbu.org/mtblog On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:15 PM, tim burlowski tim.burlow...@gmail.comwrote: All: I wanted to chime in on this conversation and take the time to mention two

Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ?

One last try. The last sentence should read The net result of reading the footnotes indicates that there will be one 32 bit NetBackup server platform, Windows 2003 x86-32. Thanks Ed! -- tim burlowski On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:22 PM, tim burlowski tim.burlow...@gmail.comwrote: That last

Re: [Veritas-bu] Limiting Access to NOM data

, one should not use them to make buying decisions.) -- tim burlowski Product ManagerSymantec On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, william.d.br...@gsk.com wrote: I don't think it will. NOM 6.5.4 introduces the concept of a read-only user. However NOM has no mechanism that I've seen to limit

Re: [Veritas-bu] Only 128 drives allowed on Linux?!?

like this. My de-duping VTL doesn't know know how to de-dupe an MPX image, therefore I want to stop MPX'ing. In order to still perform my backups in a reasonable amount of time, I need 180+ drives. Is that the situation you are facing? -- tim burlowski Product Manager Symantec 2009/6/9 smpt

Re: [Veritas-bu] Only 128 drives allowed on Linux?!?

I am not sure about the license side of the equation, but 128 drives is the limit. Are you able to keep 128 drives, virtual or otherwise, streaming data at a reasonable rate on this linux server? -- tim burlowski Product Manager Symantec On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Wyder Peter peter.wy

[Veritas-bu] Looking for a few good ideas

. -- tim burlowski Technical Product Manager Symantec ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.2 and off-line master server

interpreted as a state where action needs to be taken. If your cluster management software said that a service group was partially online you would want to take action and quickly. I'm working with engineering to make this distinction crisper in a future release. -- tim burlowski Technical Product

[Veritas-bu] couple of misc items

. If someone from engineering sees your question and knows the answer, it should be more likely that she or he will chime in with an answer. If you have any feedback on our participation let me know. thanks, -- tim burlowski Technical Product Manager Symantec https://forums.symantec.com/syment

[Veritas-bu] 6.5.2 Late Breaking News

. If you find this kind of openness helpful please let us know by either responding here or leaving a comment on the blog. thanks, -- Tim Burlowski Technical Product Manager Symantec ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http

[Veritas-bu] 6.5.2a/6.5.3 update

cross posting, so didn't think I should include the whole post in this email thread, I suppose I could be convinced otherwise. Please comment on the blog or here in this thread if you have any additional questions on this topic that you would like me to try and answer on the blog. -- tim burlowski

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to List Files in an Image

://www.cellcom.co.il ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- tim burlowski ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] One Client Per Policy

I posted a summary of the survey results on the NetBackup blog.Thanks to the twenty nine people sent in responses. https://forums.symantec.com/syment/blog/article?message.uid=298198 tim On Jan 26, 2008 6:34 AM, tim burlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to everyone who has responded so far

Re: [Veritas-bu] One Client Per Policy

Thanks to everyone who has responded so far. If you want to weigh in on the topic, I'll keep the poll open for four more days. thanks, tim On Jan 23, 2008 11:08 PM, tim burlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I vote this for thread of the month. Since there was so much talk on this topic I made

Re: [Veritas-bu] One Client Per Policy

/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- tim burlowski http://timbu.org/mtblog ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] A question for Veritas Backup Reporter

(approximately 865). Please help me. Regards, Asiye Yigit ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu -- tim burlowski