Sent: 05 July 2015 17:10
To: Lightner,Jeff
Cc: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install
I doubt we can push windows binaries from the master server itself. We can only
push unix binaries from the master server.
From: Lightner, Jeff jlight
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install
I doubt we can push windows binaries from the master server itself. We can only
push unix binaries from the master server.
From: Lightner, Jeff jlight...@dsservices.com
Sent: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:51:49
To: Anurag Sharma sharma.anu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install
We use the Symantec Altiris product set to deploy all sorts of software, and
that includes NetBackup clients. There are many such products, which support a
range of OS types so that you can do what you require.We do have to create
our
@mailman.eng.auburn.edugt;, veritas-bu2
lt;veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edugt;
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install
No.nbsp;nbsp; The master should be able to push to any clients it
supports.nbsp;nbsp; We have a mix of Linux, Windows and HP-UX.nbsp;
Previously we
2015 14:19:37 +
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install
You can create the policy in NetBackup and use that screen to push to the
clients you’re installing.That assumes you’ve opened up connection to the
clients.
You’d want separate policies for AIX, RHEL
the push some time ago in favor of doing ssh install to Linux and
Unix.
From: Anurag Sharma [mailto:sharma.anu...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 2:21 AM
To: Lightner, Jeff; veritas-bu; veritas-bu2
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install
Jeff,
If my master
Hello All,
Let say we have our master server on solaris 10 (sprac architecture) and Media
servers on Redhat and AIX and windows.
Now we need to install NetBackup clients on 5000 server with mixed OS linux,
windows etc.
What is the best way to install clients ?
I know we can push through SCCM
-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Anurag Sharma
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 5:17 AM
To: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Clients : Mass Install
Hello All,
Let say we have our master server on solaris 10 (sprac architecture) and Media
servers on Redhat and AIX
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native
client support
My apologies to Neil Conner. I realize on looking at this again today that he
was trying to point out the compatibility matrix still shows use of the RHEL
2.6 client package for RHEL7.1
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Lightner, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 2:11 PM
To: Neil Conner
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native
client
How do we get this. So far as we can tell despite documentation to the
contrary as detailed below we are still only seeing Linux Kernel 2.6 support in
our 7.6 installation.
We had found technote some time ago while still running NetBackup 7.1:
In the OS compatibility list, look for the section “Client Selections for
Backup Policies” and you’ll see the following:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 x86-64 Linux,RedHat2.6.18
Neil
On Apr 23, 2015, at 8:29 AM, Lightner, Jeff jlight...@dsservices.com wrote:
How do we get this.
is Where is
the client to use for RHEL7's 3.x kernel?
From: Neil Conner [mailto:n...@mbari.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:15 PM
To: Lightner, Jeff
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native
client support
In the OS
We have NetBackup 7.6.0.4 running on Red Hat Linux 6.6 as our master server
with a requirement to backup a number of Oracle 12c Databases (also running on
RHEL 6.6) using the new Symantec OIA product. The databases are all RAC
clusters, which the agent cannot cope with, so we are backing each
I first backup to tape and that is multiplexing so lots of jobs run at the
same time. Then, I start duplication from the current tapes to new tapes. For
some of the server images, it goes pretty quickly and I can actually watch
the file size go up as it duplicates.
Are you specifying -mpx
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Bluejay Adametz
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 7:38 AM
To: Veritas List
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 - Windows Slow duplication Tape to Tape
-- How do I check for the -mpx on my
-- How do I check for the -mpx on my bpduplicate? The entire job is run through
a GUI interface so I have never seen that option.
I first backup to tape and that is multiplexing so lots of jobs run at the same
time. Then, I start duplication from the current tapes to new tapes. For some
of
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of gregsih
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:28 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Oracle Intelegent Agent
We have NetBackup 7.6.0.4 running on Red Hat Linux 6.6 as our master server
-- How do I check for the -mpx on my bpduplicate? The entire job is run
through a GUI interface so I have never seen that option.
I've only done duplications via the command line (we script our
duplications), However, looking around in the Java GUI, when you get
to the Setup Duplication
2nd thing consider not duplicating from tape. They can only do one
thing at a time and can end up searching for data sequentially.
Consider basic disk and staging, or synthetic backup, or deduplication
in combination with data life cycle policies.
BasicDisk is free, and can make use of
First make sure your data buffers are set. This can improve performance
InstallPath\Veritas\NetBackup\db\config
(touch files are plain text files no extensions)
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_RESTORE
This can be a trial and error kind of thing but we use LOT3-5 and we have the
data
Hello,
I have been pulling my hair out for a couple of weeks on this issue. I first
backup to tape and that is multiplexing so lots of jobs run at the same time.
Then, I start duplication from the current tapes to new tapes. For some of the
server images, it goes pretty quickly and I can
Jeff . Thanks for your reply. The Netbackup Administration Console I am
trying to get to work is the one this you can install on a windows machine. It
is run from the start menu in windows. I am o.k with the jnbSA , X window
method and use this regularly using putty X forwarding. I
Hi,
Please forgive my confusion, but what does putty and the windows admin console
have to do with each other. You can use putty to login to the master then use
the jnbSA to initiate an X display. Otherwise you use the windows admin console
an specify the master server name. The server you are
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:55 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel
Hi,
Please forgive my confusion, but what does
With NBU 7.1, the Java console and native Windows console are pretty much the
same. Prior to that, there was a huge difference in functionality. The only
real difference between the two is that when you are accessing client
properties through the native Windows console, you can actually
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of
*netbac...@whelan-consulting.co.uk
*Sent:* Monday, November 24, 2014 4:55 AM
*To:* VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty
tunnel
Hi,
Please
Just for clarification. My e-mail post was with regards to the 5230 model and
not the 5220 though I did my POC with a 5220.
The 5230 is leaps and bounds a complete and different generation than the 5220
- really no comparison in my books.
My three 5230's are doing exactly what I need of them and
I am trying to use the Netbackup Administration Console as I believe it has
certain advantages over the jnbSA jave interface. There are fire walls between
my Windows machine where I want to run Administration Console and the redhat
server which is the netbackup master server. To this end I
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of richarn
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:09 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel
I am trying to use the Netbackup Administration
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel
When you say NetBackup Administration Console exactly what command are you
running?
The jnbSA can actually be started from UNIX/Linux but since it is Java is
sending an X window to you. If the console you're talking about is also
by
not doing enough of that ahead of time. In this space, performance and
functionality go hand-in-hand at times.
From: Scott Jacobson sjaco...@novell.com
To: Mikhail Nikitin mikhail.niki...@gmail.com,
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: 11/16/2014 01:48 PM
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu
I appreciate all the posts and opinions, i welcome some more as the information
is valuable in making the decision, i am bit concerned about performance and
reliability ( as mentioned by Scott) so hopefully more Appliance users can
validate this issue.
I do feel Scott's issue may be 5220
The 5220 appliance RAID card was powered by a battery and the battery went
bad on them sometimes. Since the 5230 the RAID card is capacity and we have
had zero problems since then. The 5230 with the 2.6.0.2 code can scale up
to 148TB now, the 5330 will scale up to 450TB by summer.
On Monday,
You'll likely receive many responses to your inquire so I add mine as well. In
my research with DD and Quantum is that they were all compatible pieces to
create the solution your seeking, however, there are many moving parts in
getting them to work and some features are missing (as mentioned,
Couple of things to consider.
NBU Appliance is a media server plus a dedupe pool so it can do offhost
VMware backups over SAN whereas OST Appliances need a media server. Some
additional features like VMware instant recovery are not yet available for
OST partners.
You can attach Data Domain to
Our company is considering NBU for backup solution using backup appliance, our
environment is mainly VMWARE ( 800+ guest) 30 + ESX and 30+Solaris boxes.
We also need Exchange backups to improve and keep the backup over the san when
possible.
We will need data replicated offsite also.
Current
, November 14, 2014 10:11 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain
Our company is considering NBU for backup solution using backup appliance, our
environment is mainly VMWARE ( 800+ guest) 30 + ESX and 30+Solaris boxes.
We also need Exchange
?
*From:* veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [
mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Preston,
Douglas
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:12 AM
*To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Netbackup
@mailman.eng.auburn.edumailto:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.
I think I am going to have a lot of trouble importing this tape.
Not only am I on 7.1 but my master server is Windows and theirs was Solaris
Anyone have a possible way for me to read
Does 7.5 write to tape differently than 7.1?
Trying to import a tape written in 7.5 to our master server using 7.1
bpimport -id ATL323
Import phase 2 started 9/9/2014 8:24:46 AM
INF - Importing policy Lereta_SPL_1, schedule Full (atl-sunprod_1410102290), med
ia id ATL323, created on 09/07/2014
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Preston, Douglas
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:12 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.
Does 7.5 write to tape differently than 7.1?
Trying to import a tape
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences.
I think I am going to have a lot of trouble importing this tape.
Not only am I on 7.1 but my master server is Windows and theirs was Solaris
Anyone have a possible way for me to read this tape without installing Solaris
and creating a new
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Mikhail Nikitin
Sent: July-17-14 10:30 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question
Hi,
No, NetBackup does not propagate
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup change policy attribute question
There is no contradiction between your understanding and bpexpdate -recalculate.
The original question was about policy settings (not retention levels) and
change in the policy will not be propagated. The change in retention levels
If I change the retention attributes on an existing policy, do the retention
attributes apply to that which was backed up prior to making the change? e.g.
if I change retention attributes from 1 year, to 45 days, will data older than
45 days that has been backed up prior to making the policy
Hi,
No, NetBackup does not propagate changes in retention retrospectively.
If you need to change retention of existing images, you need to run bpexpdate
with the -recalculate switch for the images in question.
On 3 Jul 2014, at 3:56 am, settler nbu-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
If I change
Anyone done it ? Any gotcha ? I haven't worked on nbu appliance and PDDO any
questions on those ?
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
, April 26, 2014 7:37 PM
To: veritas-bu; veritas-bu2
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 certification
Anyone done it ? Any gotcha ? I haven't worked on nbu appliance and PDDO any
questions on those ?
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:32 +
From: Iverson, Jerald jerald.iver...@invesco.com
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.1 convert catalog to 7.5
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
821dc9c5c44a7a4ebb4e64c1ebbdeaa302160...@ushouxmb11
environment: redhat linux 7.5 master/media server
we move (archive) old catalog images which don't expire under
netbackup/db/images for 1 client to a nfs mounted filesystem to keep the image
database to a managable size, and then link an epoch directory to the nfs mount
if needed for a
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 7.1 convert catalog to 7.5
environment: redhat linux 7.5 master/media server
we move (archive) old catalog images which don't expire under
netbackup/db/images for 1 client to a nfs mounted filesystem to keep the
image database
: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,
From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com
To: sharma.anu...@hotmail.com
CC: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Hi Anurag,
DD Boost over FC utilizes additional DFC storage server responsible for FC
transfer, on top those you have
: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:18:46 +1100
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,
From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com
To: sharma.anu...@hotmail.com
CC: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Anurag,
This is not correct.
Several DD models have been qualified
-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,
Hi Sunil,
I believe you can use DD Boost over FC between media server and DD. With
NetWorker you can use ClientDirect with FC, too if memory serves me well.
However, DDs can't replicate over FC atm, you have to use 1 or 10 gig
links to replicate data
mangement IP then transfer
data using FC ???
Anurag
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:18:46 +1100
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,
From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com
To: sharma.anu...@hotmail.com
CC: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Anurag
IP
right ? So I guess you will establish initial connection using mangement IP
then transfer data using FC ???
Anurag
--
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:18:46 +1100
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,
From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com
To: sharma.anu
device as VTL and DDBOOST at the same time.
Anurag
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:58:33 +1100
From: mikhail.niki...@gmail.com
To: sunilgulati1...@gmail.com
CC: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup With Data Domain,
Hi Sunil,
I believe you can use DD Boost over FC
Hello,
Can we use DDboost feature over FC ? Like I have production and a DR site
in my environment. I have data domain netbackup media servers at both
location. I have kept tape library at my primary site for tape outs.
I want to use SLP which will run 4 backup jobs (Backup, Replication,
Hi Sunil,
I believe you can use DD Boost over FC between media server and DD. With
NetWorker you can use ClientDirect with FC, too if memory serves me well.
However, DDs can't replicate over FC atm, you have to use 1 or 10 gig links
to replicate data.
Of course you need DD OS 5.4+, DD Boost
THIS POSITION IS IN INDIA ONLY
NetBackup SMEs required urgently Ericsson anybody intersted please share your
resume at sharma.anu...@hotmail.com ___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Hello,
Can someone share their experience with NDMP stream Deduplication using
Netbackup Accelerator?
Thanks,
Dwayne Adams
http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/power-netbackup-deduplication-application-awareness-and-global-deduplication
Hi All,
We had EMC Celera NAS Filers backups taken by NetBackup NDMP Agent.
However these Filers were decommissioned .
I remember a limitation that if NDMP backups, backed through a particular
filer can be restored only to a filer of similar make and model . It cannot
be redirected to another
: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another
Filer non-celera
Probably not but you can ask EMC. We had a similar issue and still have a
Celerra without support, just to allow restores until the backups expire.
NDMP uses the native 'dump' capability of the appliance, which
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Venkatraghavan
Marisamy
Sent: 05 September 2013 08:44
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to another Filer
non-celera
Hi All,
We had EMC Celera NAS Filers
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu javascript:;] On Behalf Of
William Brown
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:11 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu javascript:;
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup NDMP backups need to restore to
another Filer non-celera
Probably not but you can ask EMC. We had a similar issue
thanks for your time
I will look into this
-Steve
+--
|This was sent by steven_h...@sdesigns.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
All-
I have the following setup
location 1
media server
master server
---
location 2
media server
the locations are connected with a fast network connection
but every-once-in-a-while I have a network connection problem(about 2 seconds)
between the 2 sites, when this happens the running jobs
: [Veritas-bu] netbackup media-server - master-server
All-
I have the following setup
location 1
media server
master server
---
location 2
media server
the locations are connected with a fast network connection
but every-once-in-a-while I have a network connection problem(about 2 seconds
Maybe Netbackup has the robot arm and mtx can't talk to it.??
+--
|This was sent by dpe...@acxiom.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
I recommend opening a case with Symantec Support on this.
There are no known issues with bpdbm in 7.5.0.6 that I could find.
It would be beneficial if we could get a couple of bpdbm crash dumps and debug
logs so that we may see what is using the memory in addition to bpdbm.
Steve Murphy
Jerald, you bring up a valid point. 2 of them, actually.
In 7.5, the image header is no longer a standalone file, it resides in the EMM
database.
As to bpimmedia, this was discovered earlier on in 7.5 so it is a known issue.
However, it has not come up in an actual Support case.
There is a bug
i've upgraded 1 of my environments to 7.5.0.6, and noticed that the
db/images/client/epoch_dir/policy_epoch_backup-type files are no
longer there. the .f files are there, and now a .lck file is there, but not
the backup image header file for me to grab backup data out of. so i'm trying
to
I am running netbackup 7.5.0.6 and the BPDBM process is consuming all of the
memory on the master backup server. We were running the .4 release, support
recommended we upgrade, but that did not resolve the issue. The server is
running W2K8 R2, symptoms arose about 4 weeks back, close to when
.
William
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] on behalf of Neil Conner
[n...@mbari.org]
Sent: 01 May 2013 23:58
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] on behalf of Neil Conner
[n...@mbari.org]
Sent: 01 May 2013 23:58
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script
Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 on Linux.
I
23:58
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script
Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 on Linux.
I have some 32-bit Linux machines that need to be backed up. I still have the
6.5 installation CDs, so that's not a problem. But I'd like to install
Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 on Linux.
I have some 32-bit Linux machines that need to be backed up. I still have the
6.5 installation CDs, so that's not a problem. But I'd like to install the
6.5.6 update to be consistent with my other clients. As near as I can tell,
the scripts supplied
Conner
[n...@mbari.org]
Sent: 01 May 2013 23:58
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.6 client update script
Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.5 on Linux.
I have some 32-bit Linux machines that need to be backed up. I still have the
6.5 installation CDs, so
hi all!
os : solaris 10
i have already worked fine mtx . After that i install netbackup 6.5.
now when i execute /usr/local/sbin/mtx -f /dev/scsi/changer/c4t0d0 status
no Data Transfer Element reported
i reinstall mtx package but its not help me.
must I remove the mtx package before Netbackup
There is an agent for Netbackup to automate backups of Enterprise Vault. For
more details see the following:
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH126523
+--
|This was sent by dascot...@live.com via
http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO44506
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Simon Weaver simon.wea...@iscl.net wrote:
Hello George
Many thanks that this as it is very very helpful information.
Tell me I'm not fully aware of all the keywords in regards to the
intelligent policy for VM But is
From: Anatoly Pugachev [mailto:mator...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thu 24/01/2013 09:53
To: Simon Weaver
Cc: George Winter; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification
http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO44506
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:28
23/01/2013 16:14
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query
I'm doing EV 10.0.3 backups through NBU 7.5.0.4
I use the directives and the database/app agent on my EV servers.
I'm not sure if you know about the safety
,
~ Robin
From: Simon Weaver [mailto:simon.wea...@iscl.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:55 AM
To: Robin Small; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10 - Question / Query
Hello Robin
The SQL Side is done using NetBackup for SQL (So its
Hi All
I am looking for some advice or assitance in regards to Enterprise Vault Email
Backups and NetBackup 7.5
Presently, I have been doing Full backups of all drive letters of the Server
(Windows 2008 R2) and Diff backups during the week (Based on the Enterprise
Vault details I found).
Hello again
2 posts in a day :) Rare!
I am now looking at VMware Integration with vSphere 4.x and NBU 7.5.0.4.
So far tests have gone well, but I got a quick question regarding RDM's.
Essentially, I have over 1000 VM's with a mix of RDM's and no RDM's.
Question: Is there any easy method in
to an external sql server?
~ Robin
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Simon Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:13 AM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup / Enterprise Vault 10
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Simon Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:29 AM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification
Hello again
2 posts
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5 / Vmware API - RDM Identification
Hello again
2 posts in a day :) Rare!
I am now looking at VMware Integration with vSphere 4.x and NBU 7.5.0.4.
So far tests have gone well, but I got a quick question regarding RDM's
Hello,
I see this every so often, was curious if anyone else has seen this with
7.5.0.3?
12/09/2012 22:27:30 - Info bpdbm (pid=22505) staging relational database
files for catalog backup
12/09/2012 22:27:30 - Info bpdbm (pid=22505) staging NBAZDB backup to
/usr/openv/db/staging
12/09/2012
Hi,
In the bpdbm log:
NBDBsystem: System call failed with status: 1792
validate_database: Database validation failed for database NBDB
Justin.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote:
Hello,
I see this every so often, was curious if anyone else has seen
Anyone out there using NetBackup dedupe appliances (5000, 5020) in a
multiple node configuration having any problems where a content router node
seems to just hang and require power-cycling? I have a NetBackup 5000
appliance at one location at version 1.4.1.1 that for some reason just
hangs. It
It can be pinged, but console access is locked up, and ssh is
similarly non-responsive. After the node is power-cycled, the storage pool
comes back up and is happy until the next time. I've had this happen 3
times this year, but two of those instances have happened in the last 3
weeks.
If you're going to 1.4.3, check with Symantec on this first.
Otherwise, if you want to go 1.4.2, make sure you get any other EEBs that
go along with it. There is a RAID controller patch that is pretty important
and I can't remember if it's in 1.4.2 or not.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:41 AM,
Anyone have any experience backing up StorNext volumes. We are getting
EXTREMELY slow backups of one of these types of volumes., it has thousands of
small web content files.
7.1.0.3
HP-UX 11.31 Master and Media Servers
Thank you,
Layne
___
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu,
veritas-bu-bounce cc
s...@mailman.eng.aub
urn.edu Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup
As you have suggested Netbackup have a feature for backing up VMDK, But
that requires equal amount of space in the datastore. Please correct me if
i am wrong.
I've been experimenting with this for the last week or so with
NetBackup 7.5.0.3, and, no, it does not duplicate the VMDKs on the
It was because they wanted to redesign the reverse lookup zones to
ease administration. They had forgotten to mention this and assumed
that all clients dynamically registered at reboot in the maintenance
weekend when the change was done.
Regards
Michael
2012/9/5 tsimerson
Graff Andersen
Sent: 04 September 2012 13:55
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo()
for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)
Hello Justin
I have seen the same thing on Netbackup
1 - 100 of 1828 matches
Mail list logo
