OTECTED]>
> To: "dave markham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 5:01:56 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Retentions
>
> I just checked a 3 month backup from last night (I don't h
rn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 5:01:56 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Retentions
I just checked a 3 month backup from last night (I don't have any 6 month).
It started @ 1197958489 (12/18/07 00:14:49)
It says that it expires @ 1205993689 (3/20/08
ere...if I can find it, I'll post it here.
Chapa
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby
Williams
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Retentions
I j
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 5:07 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Retentions
Guys im being asked by management a bit of a stupid question but i don't
know for 100% so thought id check here.
I
Guys im being asked by management a bit of a stupid question but i don't
know for 100% so thought id check here.
If i have a retention set to 6 months i assume it is 6 months e.g from
02/01/07 to 02/07/07 and not 6 * 4 weeks or a certain number of days?
I know you can edit retentions but im just
eing able to explain without a doubt why an entry is or isn't in
them.
Thanks for the comments Ed.
Cheers,
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 5:19 PM
To: Dyck, Jonathan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dyck, Jonathan
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 2:37 PM
> To: Wayne T Smith; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] retentions
>
> Just to chime in on the Aptare reports...
>
> They have an automated report ("out of th
edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] retentions
I, too, agree the 2-week retention should be addressed ... quite risky.
A few thoughts ...
I recently tested Aptare StorageConsole and one of its out-of-the-box
displays is close what you're looking for, I think. When we obtain a
license, I'll b
Oracle to take
> 2 weeks 4 hours to
> try and fix RAC.
>
>
>
> From: Curtis Preston
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:10 PM
> To: Brandon Zermeno;
> veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] retentions
>
it up to Oracle to take 2 weeks 4 hours to
try and fix RAC.
From: Curtis Preston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:10 PM
To: Brandon Zermeno; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] retentions
How about setting a longer retention period and
I, too, agree the 2-week retention should be addressed ... quite risky.
A few thoughts ...
I recently tested Aptare StorageConsole and one of its out-of-the-box
displays is close what you're looking for, I think. When we obtain a
license, I'll be discarding many scripts ... one of which sort
like infrastructure related.status 96, 50, 219, etc.
Paul
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Ed Wilts
> Sent: July 19, 2007 8:29 PM
> To: 'Brandon Zermeno'; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>
her
reason.
Paul
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Ed Wilts
> Sent: July 19, 2007 8:29 PM
> To: 'Brandon Zermeno'; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] retentions
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Ed Wilts
> Sent: 20 July 2007 01:29
> To: 'Brandon Zermeno'; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] retentions
> What we have actually
essage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon
Zermeno
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:51 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] retentions
We had an issue where was server was down for over 2 weeks and the last full
backups expired. The ret
sday, July 19, 2007 3:51 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] retentions
We had an issue where was server was down for over 2 weeks and the last
full backups expired. The retention for this environment is 2 weeks.
After the tapes expired the App team decided they wanted to
edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] retentions
This is what I am looking for. We have had nothing but useless junk from
Command Central and Advanced Reporter and I have no faith in the latest
version Backup Reporting. Does Aptare manage to show you when the last
backup was run successfully?
In this case we ove
> This is what I am looking for. We have had nothing but useless junk
> from Command Central and Advanced Reporter and I have no faith in the
latest
> version Backup Reporting. Does Aptare manage to show you when the last
> backup was run successfully?
Aptare StorageConsole absolutely does this.
not an option.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren
Dunham
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 4:38 PM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] retentions
> As far as I know once images expire they are deleted from
> As far as I know once images expire they are deleted from the Netbackup
> catalog - as a result (and as you state) it is not possible to unexpire
> images within the catalog via bpexpdate. The only option is to manually
> import the images off the tapes, assuming you know what tapes have the
> i
* Brandon Zermeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 15:50]:
> We had an issue where was server was down for over 2 weeks and the last
> full backups expired. The retention for this environment is 2 weeks.
> After the tapes expired the App team decided they wanted to restore. Now
> management wants Ve
catalog anymore.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon
Zermeno
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 15:51
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] retentions
We had an issue where was server was down for over 2 weeks and the last
full backups expired. Th
We had an issue where was server was down for over 2 weeks and the last
full backups expired. The retention for this environment is 2 weeks.
After the tapes expired the App team decided they wanted to restore. Now
management wants Veritas to extend the retention period automatically if
a full is no
23 matches
Mail list logo
