Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you
plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA??
I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is
a must for us.
Thanks for answering.
Regards,
J-C
--~--~-~--~~~-
+1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as
nice) to do merges. Please add merging.
On May 7, 12:15 pm, jcdesrochers wrote:
> Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you
> plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA??
>
> I'm
Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Versions until I
discovered this was missing. svn switch too.
On May 26, 4:32 am, rwgrier wrote:
> +1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as
> nice) to do merges. Please add merging.
>
> On May 7, 12:15 pm, jcdesrochers
Ditto on the +1 for a Merge feature.
On May 28, 11:57 pm, drzax wrote:
> Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Versions until I
> discovered this was missing. svn switch too.
>
> On May 26, 4:32 am, rwgrier wrote:
>
> > +1 here. I currently have to fire up an
Isn't it merging when you hold alt and drag the dir/file into the dir
you want to merge with.
On May 29, 9:30 am, denisa wrote:
> Ditto on the +1 for a Merge feature.
>
> On May 28, 11:57 pm, drzax wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Ve
Nope, that's copying, and if you copy a directory to where you store
branches, that's branching. Merging is when you consolidate the
changes from a branch.
- Quinn
On May 30, 2009, at 9:53 AM, derekr wrote:
Isn't it merging when you hold alt and drag the dir/file into the dir
you want to
+1 here.
On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers wrote:
> Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you
> plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA??
>
> I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is
> a must for us.
>
> Thanks for answ
+1. Version such a great svn client in all other cases. But lack of
conflicts resolving...
I have to avoid revert my changes, update and add them again. It's
such a headache
On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers wrote:
> Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you
> plan in a
+1 here too
Sorry, I generally avoid these +1 threads, but Merge seems such an
obvious, essential, svn function that is missing from Versions. Pretty
much everything else I need is in there.
I kept switching between Versions and SmartSVN (for merging) but now I
don't bother I'm in SmartSVN
I've never used a tool other than command line svn and a text editor to
handle merges because all of my merging has been pretty simple. However, I
would probably become more adventurous with what I used merging for if I had
a good tool to help me with it.
To make this thread more helpful to the Ve
Another +1 from me. We're a cross-platform shop so I tend to use
TortoiseSVN on Windows to do merges, but a fast, integrated merge
window would make Versions much nicer to use.
On May 7, 5:15 pm, jcdesrochers wrote:
> Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you
> plan in
Conflict resolution is a separate issue and feature from merge support
— conflicts can occur even without branches or tags, and even with a
single developer, so long as there are conflicting edits in multiple
working copies.
Out of curiosity, do other clients offer conflict resolution? In m
I bought and use Versions, and use Subcommander for svn merge + svn
switch. I guess I'll add my +1 on the chance it might help to
influence the developers, and add what I posted a year ago, expanding
on Ray's suggestion to share how we use our tools..
Our workflow uses developer branches, that we
+1 for me.
Having recently moved from Perforce to SVN I'm a little surprised how poorly
supported merging is (in general). In the past we'd create branches for any
non-trivial development task and integrate back into the trunk only after
acceptance testing.
Whilst Perforce's clients are certainly
Yep, +1 here too.
I introduced SVN to our shop in the last month. With our staff still
grasping concepts, keeping all the interaction within one UI will
encourage us all to become Versions evangelists, not to mention depend
all the more on your tool instead of searching for alternatives.
Cheers,
I have 3 mac users switching from PC in the office and using Versions,
they are all crying for merge.
So I guess that makes +3
On May 7, 4:15 pm, jcdesrochers wrote:
> Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you
> plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... an
16 matches
Mail list logo
