Re: [videoblogging] Creative Commons, 10 day window

2005-12-22 Thread Harold Johnson
This is *extremely* important, everyone -- I hope we can show our support, in any way we can afford. Fact is, we can't afford to live in the copyrighted world without CC licensing.Podcaster Herald http://podcasterherald.comproducing via CC licensingOn 12/22/05, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [videoblogging] Creative Commons, 10 day window

2005-12-22 Thread David Meade
On 12/22/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally, let's not confuse CC licenses with the works they license. CC is not responsible for all the great CC content that is out there we are Well, true, but with out CC a huge portion of what we consider cool in vlogging -- the inherrent

Re: [videoblogging] Creative Commons, 10 day window

2005-12-22 Thread Markus Sandy
David Meade wrote: On 12/22/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally, let's not confuse CC licenses with the works they license. CC is not responsible for all the great "CC" content that is out there we are Well, true, but with out CC a huge portion of what

Re: [videoblogging] Creative Commons, 10 day window

2005-12-22 Thread robert a/k/a r
Markus, in my post there was no suggestion that we form a committee of joint vlogger fund, perhaps you misunderstood. Of course there is always allocation of scarce resources questions, I assumed it a given since we are all grown ups on here and already know that. The sole purpose of the post

Re: [videoblogging] Creative Commons, 10 day window

2005-12-22 Thread Markus Sandy
robert a/k/a r wrote: Markus, in my post there was no suggestion that we form a committee of joint vlogger fund, perhaps you misunderstood. Of course there is always allocation of scarce resources questions, I assumed it a given since we are all grown ups on here and already know