Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Brook Hinton
"The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should be short. ", The whole point of not having to answer to corporate sponsors and its-only-about-money gatekeepers is we DON'T have to appeal to everyone, to answer to anyone, or to alter our vision to get "hits". Long form is

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Jay dedman
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Jacek Artymiak wrote: > Split it into two parts and end their names with ", part 1" and ", > part 2". YouTube player will play one after another automatically if > you put them on the same playlist Hmmm...didnt know this. This is good information. jay -- http:

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread @sull
that is very true, jay. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jay dedman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Adriana Kaegi > > > wrote: > > The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should > be > > short. > > Yeah, this is a good rule of thumb, but not an absolute

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Jacek Artymiak
Split it into two parts and end their names with ", part 1" and ", part 2". YouTube player will play one after another automatically if you put them on the same playlist -- Jacek Artymiak http://devGuide.net Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50168432081 Twitter: http://twitter.com/d

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Jay dedman
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Adriana Kaegi wrote: > The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should be > short. Yeah, this is a good rule of thumb, but not an absolute rule. Many folks just don't know how to tell a good story, so keeping it short forces a newbie to

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Richard Amirault
- Original Message - From: "Adriana Kaegi" > The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should > be short. > a Abusrd .. that line or reasoning says that no one would watch full length movies on-line (Netflix for one) or full length TV episodes (Hulu and so on)

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Adriana Kaegi
The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should be short. a --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Jay dedman wrote: > From: Jay dedman > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > Date: Friday, January 23, 2

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Kevin Lim
10min limit on Youtube, while unlimited time on the now defunked Google Video. Explains why there were even entire foreign movies posted on Google Video. Isn't it interesting how high capacity system would "naturally" be used to share commercial material? Even Justin.tv as a live streaming service

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Jay dedman
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Milam wrote: > I think the problem with videos more than 10 minutes is that alot of > people, especially videobloggers who simply talk, get bored after awhile. Back in the day,Youtube instituted the 10 minute policy for several reasons. yes, Im sure they

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Michael Verdi
I have an old director's account and I tried uploading a 30 min video yesterday. It started to get converted and even had a url for a few minutes but was then "rejected for TOS violation" and deleted. - Verdi On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Matthew Milam wrote: > I think the problem with video

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-23 Thread Matthew Milam
I think the problem with videos more than 10 minutes is that alot of people, especially videobloggers who simply talk, get bored after awhile. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Kevin Lim wrote: > I could try if you like. I still have Director status when Youtube > first handed them out. Uploa

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-22 Thread Kevin Lim
I could try if you like. I still have Director status when Youtube first handed them out. Uploaded a 19min video some Macworlds ago, but haven't really exceeded 10min since. Kevin Lim Cyberculturalist http://theory.isthereason.com This email is: [ ] bloggable[X] ask first [ ] private email

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-22 Thread @sull
part 1 and part 2 ? On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Rupert wrote: > Apparently if you were approved as a Director before they reduced the > limit for Directors, you can still upload long videos. > Has anybody here retained that superpower?! > Jay and Ryanne have a fantastic 20 minute video th

Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-22 Thread Rupert
Apparently if you were approved as a Director before they reduced the limit for Directors, you can still upload long videos. Has anybody here retained that superpower?! Jay and Ryanne have a fantastic 20 minute video that *needs* to be available on YouTube so it can get wider viewing. http://ry

[videoblogging] More than 10 minutes

2009-01-22 Thread Jay dedman
Is there anyway to upload a video longer than 10 minutes on Youtube? I know in the "old days", you could become a Director. But is there anyway around this limitation? Jay -- http://ryanishungry.com http://jaydedman.com 917 371 6790