Re: [videoblogging] Promoting the .mov option online

2009-03-13 Thread Jay dedman
> Other than that, at the risk of sounding like I'm on the Blip > payroll, the Blip flash player is quite a neat solution. It'll play > the video in the Flash player as a high quality H264 mp4 file when > one is available, or otherwise as a Flash video. Verdi wrote a post about this here: http://r

Re: [videoblogging] Promoting the .mov option online

2009-03-13 Thread Rupert
A lot of people provide a Flash player as default for maximum compatibility and then provide a text link to the high quality file underneath. In a lot of cases, you need to provide a text link to the file for podcasting purposes anyway, so you could just label that as a high quality versio

[videoblogging] Promoting the .mov option online

2009-03-13 Thread RatbagMedia
YouTube habits have encouraged a ready use of flash players online. But few people I mix with are aware that the .mov file option I offer is a much better viewing experience. So what means do folk employ to get visitors to consider either downloading or watching the .mov file instead of the fl