Re: [videoblogging] Re: Alternaitve media is a sham!

2006-02-05 Thread Adam Quirk
On 2/5/06, Ronen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While I also have mixed feeling about the posting of a death, a lot of people seem to think that it is wrong to discuss things other people are doing wrong because it is 'incitement'.  Either I am radically misunderstanding everyone, or the logical con

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Alternaitve media is a sham!

2006-02-05 Thread Ronen
I probably shouldn't post this...While I also have mixed feeling about the posting of a death, a lot of people seem to think that it is wrong to discuss things other people are doing wrong because it is 'incitement'.  Either I am radically misunderstanding everyone, or the logical conclusion of

[videoblogging] Re: Alternaitve media is a sham!

2006-02-05 Thread David Howell
My assumption is that it's a video of a beheading. You probably dont want to view it. The ends, in my opinion, do not justify the means. All I see it doing is two things. Promoting hatred against another culture and causing further uproar. Two things that are NOT needed at this time. Why he chose

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Alternaitve media is a sham!

2006-02-05 Thread Ronen
The Youtube video is down.  Since I suspect it's going to be something I'm not going to want to see, could you describe the content? SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant

[videoblogging] Re: Alternaitve media is a sham!

2006-02-05 Thread Gena
1. You are the alternative media. You have the power to create and distribute your work. I believe in the free flow of information and free speech but there is also responsibility that comes with it. 2. You have choices about the method of distribution. Many of use have made use of the free web ho