I don't know the answer for the PC. For the Mac, you build out a
high-resolution format video and drag it into Compressor (or use
export using Compressor from Final Cut Pro). From there, you drag
your presets to that video [apple tv, ipod, wmv, 3gp, ogg] and click
submit and it makes all the
I have been looking for a workflow which will allow me to move quickly
from my HDV video (Sony FX1) from the non square format to square
format for the web, Blip etc.
Visual Hub is a compression app (not free) that will do batch compression.
Just create your different settings...and it goes
I am living in a Windows world with with a linux box or two for added
flavor. So not having a Mac I am looking for Windows or Linux based
encoders.
Has anyone here tried TMPGEnc 4.0 Xpress ?
I found their site today That looks like a possible answer.
: [videoblogging] Re: Blip.tv and 1.33 aspect ratio
By way of brief introduction, I am a long time lurker, first time
poster and trying to find time for a videoblog.
I have been looking for a workflow which will allow me to move quickly
from my HDV video (Sony FX1) from the non square format to square
format
By way of brief introduction, I am a long time lurker, first time
poster and trying to find time for a videoblog.
I have been looking for a workflow which will allow me to move quickly
from my HDV video (Sony FX1) from the non square format to square
format for the web, Blip etc.
I use Vegas pro
If I'm an average video guy who just wants to make video, how would I know
whether I'm conforming or not? I have a vision, my camera shoots at this
resolution, I can output files in the same resolution from my video editor,
so how am I *not* conforming?
Im not sure if this is related, but
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm an average video guy who just wants to make video, how
would I know
whether I'm conforming or not? I have a vision, my camera shoots
at this
resolution, I can output files in the same resolution from my
pretty soon.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Cammack
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 7:10 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Blip.tv and 1.33 aspect ratio
--- In videoblogging
Repost your question here:
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/blip-users/
What kind of file do you have that has the dimensions of 1440x1080?
16x9 = 1920x1080 or 1280x720 or 640x360 or 480x270 or 320x180
4x3 = 640x480 or 320x240
What do you have that plays back 1440x1080?
--
Bill
Repost your question here:
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/blip-users/
Will do.
What kind of file do you have that has the dimensions of 1440x1080?
Every HDV camcorder on the planet records at 1440x1080. :)
16x9 = 1920x1080 or 1280x720 or 640x360 or 480x270 or 320x180
16x9 also =
Right - was just going to say that it sounds like HDV. You have to
compress that first into some sort of quicktime or wmv, converting it
to square pixels in the process so that it's one of those resolutions
that Bill said - 1280 x 720, 640 x 360, etc.
- Verdi
On Jan 15, 2008 4:27 PM, Jake
Right - was just going to say that it sounds like HDV. You have to
compress that first into some sort of quicktime or wmv, converting it
to square pixels in the process so that it's one of those resolutions
that Bill said - 1280 x 720, 640 x 360, etc.
But that doesn't really address my
You have to get the answer from the blip guys but I don't think the
intent is for you to upload your full rez video. You compress your
video and they host it (plus lots of other features).
- Verdi
On Jan 15, 2008 4:43 PM, Jake Ludington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right - was just going to
You have to get the answer from the blip guys but I don't think the
intent is for you to upload your full rez video. You compress your
video and they host it (plus lots of other features).
If I upload 1920x1080 or 1280x720 both are available for download at full
rez and look correct in their
Verdi, that's my point, exactly. My Canon HV-20 shoots 1440x1080.
This is why I asked Jake what he has that's going to play it back.
There's no reason that I can think of that blip should support those
frame dimensions.
Jake, if all those media players play back your 1440x1080 file in the
Well its certainly true that many people are used to the video they get from
the net being
square pixel aspect ratio, and it may seem strange to want otherwise.
There probably is a logic to not wanting to resize to 1920, its more pixels so
the
compression/quality may be less optimal than
Good writeup, Steve.
I still can't see the incentive for ANYONE to accommodate any old
frame size.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well its certainly true that many people are used to the video they
get from the net being
square pixel aspect
Verdi, that's my point, exactly. My Canon HV-20 shoots 1440x1080.
This is why I asked Jake what he has that's going to play it back.
There's no reason that I can think of that blip should support those
frame dimensions.
I'm not asking them to support 1440x1080 at 1.33:1 on the Web, I am
Good arguments, however, neither 1440x1080 nor 720x480 Anamorphic are
meant to be viewed (as you stated in your other post, so I'm not
telling you anything new) in those dimensions in square pixels. Since
blip delivers video to computers, which use square pixels, IMO,
there's no reason they
Good arguments, however, neither 1440x1080 nor 720x480 Anamorphic are
meant to be viewed (as you stated in your other post, so I'm not
telling you anything new) in those dimensions in square pixels. Since
blip delivers video to computers, which use square pixels, IMO,
there's no reason they
20 matches
Mail list logo
