> The thing about blogging, podcasting and all that is that now that
> people have gotten some fame out of these platforms everyone is
> expected to do that or better. Anything less gets no attention.
> I say funk all that.
> I represent the real -- the economy as is. I don't have the money for
> f
editing well doesnt take money, just skill
telling a good story doesnt take money, just a good story
:)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:57 AM, bmilam52 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the problem ultimately with me doing long videos, long
> podcasts, is that I lose the point of what I'm talking
I think the problem ultimately with me doing long videos, long
podcasts, is that I lose the point of what I'm talking about.
It's already discouraging from non-internet users when you explain to
them what you are doing, be it podcasting or blogging. They think your
just some loser who wants the w
> I always wanted to see podcasters record stories with people. Shorter
> snippets. Maybe audio diaries. Maybe just a bunch of natural sounds?
> Give me a good 10 minutes of something I cant hear on the radio.
> Fuck the radio format.
> There was a little bit of this, but the podcasting swell didnt
> (1) For producers of content, file hosting is much easier and
> generally more accessible for video than for audio. That's a Web.2.0
> anomaly I'm sure.
> (2) I don't think audio is as well served with portable flash options
> as video is. I mean that a flash video player is so often built to be
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually listen to a handful of podcasts that give good information
> and dont waste my time.
For what it's worth there are two other differences between the two
media in way of delivery:
(1) For producers of cont
