Motion has single-point motion tracking as well as 4-point motion
tracking.
http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/motion/
Click where it says "Match Moving and Tracking".
--
Bill
BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Verdi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for all of
Thanks for all of the feedback! I guess the biggest thing I need is
the motion tracking. I spend many many hours keyframing stuff over
video in FCP.
- Verdi
On Jan 11, 2008 3:27 PM, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't do a lot of FX, but I use Motion for keying and compos
I don't do a lot of FX, but I use Motion for keying and compositing.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "rudy.jahchan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> GALACTICAST has been produced on Motion since the Robojew episode. And
> if anything we have improved in quality.
>
> --- In videoblogging@yaho
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "rudy.jahchan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> GALACTICAST has been produced on Motion since the Robojew episode.
I guarantee you Noah Webster never envisioned those words being put
together in a sentence. ;)
Chris
Coming from Galacticast that's a pretty strong endorsement for Motion!
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
After Effects has become a standard. There's no way around that.
But Motion 3 is a remarkable and under-used tool. As someone who
always preferred Combustion to After Effects I'm finding it a delight,
though it isn't quite a fully featured app. Motion is no longer the
"imovie" of motion graphics,
GALACTICAST has been produced on Motion since the Robojew episode. And
if anything we have improved in quality.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Verdi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have experience with these two? I imagine that AE is
> better but I'm wondering if the ne
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But AE is still the
> tool of choice for pros but probably not worth getting unless you
really need some of the
> advanced features, as it would require not just an investment in $
but also a big
> investment in
why bother paying for either ? just dl the bt
save your money for beer
On Jan 11, 2008 1:08 PM, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would say that unless you are going to do some hardcore motion
> graphics Motion
> should suit you fine. You ca do a lot of really amazing stuff with Moti
I would say that unless you are going to do some hardcore motion graphics
Motion
should suit you fine. You ca do a lot of really amazing stuff with Motion. But
AE is still the
tool of choice for pros but probably not worth getting unless you really need
some of the
advanced features, as it wo
I would say that unless you are going to do some hardcore motion graphics
Motion
should suit you fine. You ca do a lot of really amazing stuff with Motion. But
AE is still the
tool of choice for pros but probably not worth getting unless you really need
some of the
advanced features, as it wo
Ive only used Motion 3 so cant compare properly, my guess would be that either
should
suit most people quite well, especially if they dont know what they are
missing. There's
bound to be things that each do better in some way, and that may cause an AE
expert to
grumble about something Motion
12 matches
Mail list logo
