Remy Chevalier wrote:
> Guys,
> Thanks for all the help!!!
> Check it out, my first real Vlog!
> http://www.remyc.com/Scion66_rise&shine.html
> See you on Route 66!!!
> RemyC.
RemyC, I had a few problems...
I went to:
http://www.remyc.com/Scion66_rise&shine.html
and just saw a big pink squar
Looks good, but I had a hard time understanding what you were
saying. Some kind of audio problem, I guess, or maybe you were just
speaking too softly. Are you going to Vlog the whole trip? Feel free
to look me up when you come thru St. Louis. I live very near Route
66.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAI
Guys,
Thanks for all the help!!!
Check it out, my first real Vlog!
http://www.remyc.com/Scion66_rise&shine.html
See you on Route 66!!!
RemyC.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Chris Nolan.ca wrote:
> > I guess one has to balance the viewers, do most
Chris Nolan.ca wrote:
> I guess one has to balance the viewers, do most watch the video on the
> webpage, or through the feed?
A few weeks ago, I started using a different url for the video I linked
to on the site versus the video I linked to as an enclosures. It's still
a little early, but for
Yeah, that is annoying but it is not nearly as bad as when you go to a
vlog's homepage that has every posts loading an embedded video. That
is cause for an instant click on stop and back.
Most blogging software supports a post summary and a post body. We
use the summary on all non-post pages as
This is a bit of a problem with Windows Media Player. If you right click
to open the context menu and check the Properties, it will give you the
specs of the player view, not of the video itself. It resizes itself
width-wise to whatever value you set, but height has to be correct or
things get
ah... no sorry... seems to work... never mind!
thanks!!! I think I was changing the height and the width at the
same time the last time... looks great now!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Remy Chevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The properties of the video itself tell me it's 400x300.
The properties of the video itself tell me it's 400x300.
When I resize the player dimensions smaller, it just makes
everything smaller, and the black borders are still there.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Beth Agnew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> *Re: the black borders* -- you're showing a
Re: the black borders -- you're showing a TV-style sized video
inside a movie-style player window that is 400 x 300. Change the width=
and height= specification of your player object to fit the size of the
video. Be sure to include room for the player controls.
For 320 x 240 video use width
Embedding a video vs. popping it in another window or player does not
pose any technological back-end restrictions or problems. Its a
choice for user interface and design. Whatever you would like can
work just fine.
On Oct 1, 2005, at 11:11 AM, LeanBackVids.com wrote:
>
>
> --- In videoblogg
Again, this is just my test page:
http://www.electrifyingtimes.com/attackhybrid.html
Yes, we want our video files hosted on our server.
The project is to video chronicle our Scion 66 trip www.scion66.com
with short vlogs every day. People will find them from our home page
at Electrifying Times an
> Personally, I'd recommend vloggers embed
> their movies as well as provide a directly link (maybe at the bottom).
Do others find it annoying though that when they are watching the
video in ANT and the embedded video starts playing in the HTML area?
Not only does one have to go pause the embedde
I use WordPress for LeanBackVids.com and we're able to declare a media
enclosure without having to link directly to the file. Even if I do
not add the enclosure, WordPress is ususally smart enough to do it for me.
Not sure about the "obvious permalink" though. Either way, we've
never noticed a p
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:35:08 +0200, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> most of us dont embed the videos in the page because:
> 1. there is no obvious permalink to the video.
> 2. it doesnt show up in RSS feed for syndication.
>
> (someone correct me if im wrong)
While you're not wrong per
> I think you mean http://www.freevlog.org
> Yes, I'd been there, but they only teach you how to upload videos
> onto their own server, not a do-it-yourself on your own website
> instruction. Unless I didn't quite understand what their site is
> about... do you have a direct url you're thinking abo
I think you mean http://www.freevlog.org
Yes, I'd been there, but they only teach you how to upload videos
onto their own server, not a do-it-yourself on your own website
instruction. Unless I didn't quite understand what their site is
about... do you have a direct url you're thinking about? Ste
Thanks Steve for sending me in the right direction... that sure got
me started. I wasn't able to get the code on the our media post
working properly, but the link back to the MS site itself gave me an
even simpler line of code to use and it works. Check it out!
http://www.electrifyingtimes.com/a
Hello,
No its not a redundant question at all, it comes up fairly often but
theres no harm in repeating this stuff.
Basically it depends wat format of video you use. That pinup site uses
flash, it looks like you'll be using wmv?
There are many guides to doing this stuff, and some people have
cre
18 matches
Mail list logo
