Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: When the video camera makes the
reputation...
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:20:31 -0500
Frank Carver wrote:
Thursday, August 11, 2005, 7:55:12 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
Permit for what? Do you need a permit to shoot video on the subway or
other locations? (I'm asking
Yes. That's pretty sobering :-(
Christian
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Fireant
Explains
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chrbaudry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something unexpected - and fun? - happened to me yesterday.
I have been shooting yoga and dance classes for a yoga/wellness
studio these last 4 days. Each time it is a short interview of the
teacher and when
Jack Nelson wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chrbaudry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday I brought my Canon Elura video camera which is a small
hand camera just fine to shoot video that will be streamed
Guess what? No one cared about me! Teachers had other priorities, I
was
You know, I've noticed the same thing, even the difference between the Canon GL2 and my
small handheld Canon still camera with video capability.
I try to use it to my advantage the other way as well. When I want the footage I get to be
more spontaneous, with less pressure on the subject,
Thursday, August 11, 2005, 7:55:12 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
Permit for what? Do you need a permit to shoot video on the subway or
other locations? (I'm asking because I really don't know. Are the
videographers rights the same as the well known photographers rights?)
What you need to
And there is the War On Terror aspect. In the past this list has seen
a few discussions about Subway station 'you arent allowed to film
here' legislation and the reality on the ground. I guess that one was
New York specific, cant remember details. But the basics are that if
you are videoing
Steve Watkins wrote:
And there is the War On Terror aspect. In the past this list has seen
a few discussions about Subway station 'you arent allowed to film
here' legislation and the reality on the ground. I guess that one was
New York specific, cant remember details. But the basics are
Frank Carver wrote:
Thursday, August 11, 2005, 7:55:12 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
Permit for what? Do you need a permit to shoot video on the subway or
other locations? (I'm asking because I really don't know. Are the
videographers rights the same as the well known photographers rights?)
:) You are assuming I was going to pay for them Pete.
~Devlon
On 8/11/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Devlon wrote:
On 8/11/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time to print up some 'Just Another Videoblogger' t-shirts.. :\
Oooh, ooh, I'll take 2 of those
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Nelson wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chrbaudry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday I brought my Canon Elura video camera which is a small
hand camera just fine to shoot video that will be
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Carver wrote:
Thursday, August 11, 2005, 7:55:12 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
Permit for what? Do you need a permit to shoot video on the subway or
other locations? (I'm asking because I really don't know.
The Mayor's Film Office here is pretty easy (ymmv so I've heard but not
our experience) to work with, you fill in the forms (download, filling
in takes 5 minutes), send someone up there with forms and they review
them (can take from an hour to three), they may ask a few questions (of
the
Insurance is very expensive, btw. Haven't check it out in a long while;
the only thing I can be sure of, it hasn't gone down lately.
How much is it these days and what minimum time / amount? Does the
mayor's office still require $1M?
J
--
It isn't done alone
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
Even in a private environment you need to have people sign a form agreeing to be filmed. In the case of the yoga classes we had all participants sign the document before the class... except onestudent who arrived late and at the end said she was upset by the filming and did not agree to be part
Now I do that: I use the bigger camera when I need to look professonal and get attention, and the smaller one in crowds.
christian
On 8/11/05, Jack Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chrbaudry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something unexpected - and fun? -
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:31:50 +0200, Chris Baudry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Even in a private environment you need to have people sign a form
agreeing
to be filmed. In the case of the yoga classes we had all participants
sign
the document before the class... except one student who
In Quebec, we are one of the only (if not the only) jurisdictions in North America where it is actually illegal to photograph or videotape people without permission, let alone release on television etc. It was a supreme court decision a couple of years ago that set it off... my understanding is
18 matches
Mail list logo
