so sexy as bush.
difficult to know why the masses choose for such things.
i don´t like the terms: not vlogger friendly.
i´d like to contribute to change this culture. my ethics are the creative
commons one; no mixed ethics.
that´s why i love blip (i´m so glad they don´t allow me to crosspost to
Youtube is not sexy because of any technical detail.
In fact, aesthetically, legally, ethically and in a majority of ways
it's just plain ugly.
The reason why youtube is sexy is because it delivers on a promise
that anyone can have a voice, anyone can matter, and anyone can be a
star.
-Mike
On
On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Mike Meiser wrote:
Youtube is not sexy because of any technical detail.
years ago (it seems), i used to follow 100's of vloggers in fireant
now only a few of these work on my iPhone (many come into itunes,
but few are formatted to work on the phone)
as a
as a result, YouTube has become a lot more interesting and i have
found lots of vloggers there too
I'm not really a vlogger (not yet, anyway), but I do produce a lot of
video content via Dragon*ConTV. I have many reasons why YouTube isn't my
main video host:
* YouTube TOS worries me
* video
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, aesthetically, legally, ethically and in a majority of ways
it's just plain ugly.
Hey! I thought we were talking about YouTube, not MySpace! ;)
I heard sexy is over. Sexy jumped the shark. So 90s.
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
Sexy isn't 90's. Web 2.0 is sexy.
Sexy is so 2007.
Let's hope it dies with 2007.
I'm sick of sexy.
Sexy jumped the shark when web 2.0 became an aesthetic.
Die Sexy. Die.
There's a hiaku there. I just don't care to develop it.
-Mike
On Dec 21, 2007 5:55 PM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
