On 10/13/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:06:37 +0200, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> i don't understand why you are shooting for these obcene compression> sizes...a usual 5 mb/sec is goodyou need broadband to watch videos
> online anyway
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:06:37 +0200, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i don't understand why you are shooting for these obcene compression
> sizes...a usual 5 mb/sec is goodyou need broadband to watch videos
> online anyway, so why do you compress yours to the level where the
> quality
>
I was waiting at 10 am Jan. But I had to leave for San Jose to try
and crash the Apple event. No sale. But had fun at the Santa Clara
Apple Store instead. Love that Video iPod and remote control iMacs.
And iTunes 6 is great for video.
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/1115990
We've been using the blip.tv feature as a teaching tool to show how
quickly and easily you can vlog.
It's working like a charm, particularly with shorter vids.
Blip's rockin' for us on the Road Node.
Jan
--
"It isn't done alone. Pay more."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ - educat
dial-up users need not subscribe ;-)On 10/12/05, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not bad at all. Looks fine to me. You mean 5mb/minute. I shootfor 1 mb/minute. Dial up, Dial up, Dial up, Dial up, Dial up... Thatis the WHY part Josh.--Taylor Barcroft
http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
Well yes I agree with you. It's more about the length overall. I am
going for the 1 mb/minute due to the overall length of each post. I
would like to do shorter stuff too. But the Webzine sessions is a
priority for the next month or so. And they are all long. I also
don't want to waste my a
Youd agree though that companies are moving away from caring about
dialup users?
The 1 video I bought from apple this evening was 20.1mb for a 320x176
clip that lasted 4 minutes 10 seconds. That would have taken around an
hour to download on dialup, it took approx 1 minute for me to get it.
Is yo
I would but they don't let me set the compression settings and I
don't like the way they compress so far. That will be a definite way
to go once Blip lets us have control over compression settings.
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Jo
It's not bad at all. Looks fine to me. You mean 5mb/minute. I shoot
for 1 mb/minute. Dial up, Dial up, Dial up, Dial up, Dial up... That
is the WHY part Josh.
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Webcaster, Futurecaster
Santa
He probably wants higher compression due to the length of his content.
Its fair to say that it does make the compression requirements a
bigger issue for him.
He's only wrong if he is confusing his own needs and requirements with
the needs of other people, which may be true in this case, what
bitra
i don't understand why you are shooting for these obcene compression
sizes...a usual 5 mb/sec is goodyou need broadband to watch videos
online anyway, so why do you compress yours to the level where the
quality is bad?On 10/12/05, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. I guess Blip.tv's S
use blip.tv's automatic recording safari feature (record directly to
the web) and then use their crosspost feature to put it on your
blog...one click recording/compressing/postingOn 10/12/05, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's the post it to your blog part that is the killer time waster. Idon
I agree. I guess Blip.tv's Safari recorder is along those lines. But
it is not compressing nearly enough so far.
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Webcaster, Futurecaster
Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley
URL http:/
It's the post it to your blog part that is the killer time waster. I
don't know how to do that easily. Do you?
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Webcaster, Futurecaster
Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley
URL http://F
QT Pro with a new iMac or iSight ready or vid always at the ready
might work. I got it down to 7 seconds of comments is 100K. looks OK
to me. ask for a sample off list if you want one attached to an email
back at ya.
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New Media Publis
This is the sort of stuff that might benefit from 'instantly record
online via webcam' type services.
I dont think I could be bothered too much to do video comments all the
time if it required the usual process. But if I can just switch on the
iSight, press a btton and say 'wahey i really enjoyed
record a response
post it to your blog
link to your video in the comments
On Oct 12, 2005, at 5:56 PM, aroundtheperimeter wrote:
> If you could come up with a fast way to comment with video i think it
> would be better...
--Steve
--
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog - http://stev
sorry about that i checked in the group search box and did not find
anything on video comments..must have made a mistake
If you could come up with a fast way to comment with video i think it
would be better...
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> aroundth
18 matches
Mail list logo
