[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-24 Thread David Howell
Glad to see a replied to my post. I was beginning to think no one thought it was an important issue. The reason I used him as an example was that I noticed a ton of videos from him at Blip on a continuing basis. I am pretty sure that there are others that do the same, upload copyrighted material,

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-24 Thread Jen Simmons
On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:50 AM, David Howell wrote: How about the rebroadcasting of video? I see this time and time again online where someone has captured something off the television, or downloaded it from somewhere and then slapped it up on their website. Case and point, http://www.palazzojay.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-20 Thread Jen Simmons
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:45 AM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: You missed my point. It is a great guide. My point is that videobloggers  can't do with just knowing Fair Use. There are multiple laws that  videobloggers need to familiarize themselves with - copyright being only  one. Thus it is not en

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-20 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:28:36 +0100, Jen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: > >> that's why I keep  >> recommending college text books on mass media law and not just a >> website  >> with bullet points about Fair Use. > > Just to be clear --

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-20 Thread Jen Simmons
On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: that's why I keep  recommending college text books on mass media law and not just a website  with bullet points about Fair Use. Just to be clear -- the website I recommended at: is not "just a website with bullet points"... in fact I wou

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Crystal
Yes I see your point and I agree with you 100 percentthe artist i used was Creed and they are no longer together as a group so I dunno what that meansbut anyway... I agree with everything you just said (sorry its been a long day!) Crystal --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jen

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:11:00 +0100, Carl Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And who is in the video doesn't have anything to do with it. The > copyright is > owned by the person or company that created the piece. Just like the > copyright > of a portrait I shoot as a photographer is owned b

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:28:16 +0100, Jen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for letting us know about copyright law are Australia. Anyone > else?? Other places?? The basics of Copyright are covered in the Berne Convention. These basics are shared by the 160 countries who have agreed to

RE: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Mrs. Ours MA PLPC
et a wild hair and wanna crucify some poor mid-western housewife and mother of fourI'm probably safe enough being honestly dishonest? Okay.. That's all I got The end >From: "Ms. Kitka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com >To: videob

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Ms. Kitka
People... THIS is why you never hear any new music being played by crew members on Star Trek... --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Crystal wrote: > > > Okay but how about Music? If I publish lets say stillshots with > >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Jen Simmons
On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Crystal wrote: Okay but how about Music? If I publish lets say stillshots with background music of my favorite artist that goes along with the pictures...and I have the CD so its not like I stole it off the net. Republish on the net...so every "can" see it. But

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Carl Weaver
Jen, this isn't quite accurate. There are provisions for fair use and these govern a couple things, such as what the video is being used for and how long the video clip is that you want to copy. I am not an attorney but I used to work in the copyright world, securing permission to reprint material.

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread David Howell
How about the rebroadcasting of video? I see this time and time again online where someone has captured something off the television, or downloaded it from somewhere and then slapped it up on their website. Case and point, http://www.palazzojay.blogspot.com/ The reason I am using this site as an

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Jen Simmons
Yes, in my rant I was being completely U.S.-centric without acknowledging it... (very american). I apologize. Thanks for letting us know about copyright law are Australia. Anyone else?? Other places?? This does bring up interesting points -- the internet is global, so how does the law or pra

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:35:58 +0100, Crystal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay but how about Music? If I publish lets say stillshots with > background music of my favorite artist that goes along with the > pictures...and I have the CD so its not like I stole it off the net. > Republish on the net..

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Crystal
> > Nikidigital was talking about copyright. Logos are usuallly not covered by > copyrights (they're not Works), and Home Depot certainly don't have > copyrights covering their storefronts. What you're talking about is not > copyrights! > > > It's called FAIR USE, and there are many man

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-18 Thread Kath O'Donnell
Jen, I'm guessing you live in USA?just for info for any Aussies on the list who haven't already seen this, here's a fair use - myths & misconceptions document from Australian Copyright Centre ( http://www.copyright.org.au ) as there are some differences between Aus & US lawshttp://www.copyright

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-18 Thread Ms. Kitka
I agree with Jen... I've been debating this all evening over the phone with my bf in New York... man our long distance bill is gonna suck... Kitka --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2006, at 6:47 PM, nikadigital wrote: > > > it doesn't ma

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-18 Thread nikadigital
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Crystal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "nikadigital" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > hello > > > > i'm new to the yahoo group wanted to say hey. glad to be here. > > > > i may not have all of the facts, but i think

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-18 Thread nikadigital
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Crystal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "nikadigital" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > hello > > > > i'm new to the yahoo group wanted to say hey. glad to be here. > > > > i may not have all of the facts, but i think

[videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-18 Thread Crystal
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "nikadigital" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hello > > i'm new to the yahoo group wanted to say hey. glad to be here. > > i may not have all of the facts, but i think i get the jest of it. > i am no expert but thier is a good reference book from focal press >