thank you so much for this post. of course, having been deleted some
dozen times from youtube i cannot apply.
anybody wanna lend me their partner account with youtube long enough
for me to fill out the application and get seen by those managing
this new app? i'll give it back, without havin
Good news.
On 12-Feb-09, at 11:45 AM, Kevin Lim wrote:
Since it's related to micropayments, Joi Ito twittered that Youtube is
implementing Creative Commons as well as Google Checkout for Youtube
partners to sell video downloads! We previously discussed how they
would likely not do it, but looks l
Wow, that could be a game changer, right there.
I wonder what they're going to want as a % of sales...
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://discdogradio.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Kevin Lim wrote:
> Since it's related to micropayments, Joi It
Since it's related to micropayments, Joi Ito twittered that Youtube is
implementing Creative Commons as well as Google Checkout for Youtube
partners to sell video downloads! We previously discussed how they
would likely not do it, but looks like they just did!
http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=Mp1
we here at dyna-flix.com, being ever the contrarians, just had our
best ever month of sales. most of which comes in $5 individual
transactions. we have as yet to have any relations with advertisers.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton
wrote:
>
> "Free is a right" is, for
>
I firmly believe voluntary support, with a bit of added-value product sales,
is the future, either directly to a site or through a service provider or
some kind link Kachingle (I don't know if their model will work, but it's a
much more promising idea than micropayments). "Free is a right" is, for
this situation interests me greatly because i used to work
for a newspaper as a reporter and i loved it
i wrote about immigration issues in a small town in florida, a
very conservative town that didnt like illegal immigrants but
subsided on their labor, etc etc
so the stories that i was able to r
Thanks for the response, Jay!
> > The hitch, so far, is convincing professionals to give their stuff
> > away, to essentially join the open source movement. It's been
> painful
> > so far - not much interest from big heavy hitters.
>
> Seems like the bigger challenge is finding professionals who
> The hitch, so far, is convincing professionals to give their stuff
> away, to essentially join the open source movement. It's been painful
> so far - not much interest from big heavy hitters.
Seems like the bigger challenge is finding professionals who love your
specific community (dog training)
Very interesting article.
Even more interesting discussion that flowed from it.
I'm going to get around this by taking the open source route.
The project that I'm working on is going to have a TON of free
content and free community interaction.
I'm going to be giving away foundational and gene
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman wrote:
>
> Following up on our recent conversation about micropayments supporting
> videobloggers, Clay Shirky just posted another installment of "why
> micropayments wont work".
> http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-
p
http://www.cambrianhouse.com/idea-explorer/idea-promoter/ideas-id/8riBvU5/
:)
On 1/30/07, Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I looked briefly at indiekarma and like what they are attempting. I
> personally want to give people a choice - free is great at inviting
> people in to have
I looked briefly at indiekarma and like what they are attempting. I
personally want to give people a choice - free is great at inviting
people in to have a look-see and stay as long as they like. Enabling
people to pay is a longer term part of changing the consciousness of
buyers. It's for the loya
I like this idea too, Sull.
Perhaps all of my free stuff could be part of the whole that would
need to be tied into the paid version to have the real nuts in bolts.
Make 'em pay for the punchline, or the trick to the trick. You could
get the flavor, but not the meal, so to speak.
I also lik
I am also a believer in mixing both paid and free content.
For example, every month you out a video that requires a payment... maybe
it's $5.
It obviously helps if this video is somewhat different than your regular
shows.
What the difference is would be up to you, the producers.
But it could be a g
see indiekarma.com for similar approach related to viewing a blog.
i had talked to indiakarma about doing an integration with
fundavlog.comback in August.
it's an interesting approach to micro-payments than can be further developed
for media.
On 1/28/07, Ron Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
TUBE POINTS!
That's exactly what I was thinking, although i did not have that
point system concept. That's pretty slick.
Is there any value add that we could offer as content creators for
making a point system attractive for viewers?
I kind of like the sans-advertising concept, but I'm not s
i'd prefer to make payments over viewing ads often too but when I
surveyed my audience the answer was overwhelming: we'll take ads, we
don't want to pay; it's too good it should be free so anyone can see
it. i didn't offer the choice of two feeds (free with ads or no ads
for fee)
I went ahead and
Speaking only as a viewer, Id like to be able to make micropayments
without thinking about it when watching content.
Its hard to get people to pay if there is a lot of simialr stuff out
there for free, but my personal hatred of adverts means Id gladly pay
to avoid them.
Say for example once Youtu
19 matches
Mail list logo
