November!
Now I'm excited.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert wrote:
>
> I'm putting together a project that will hopefully allow people to
> take a share proportional to their investment.
> Basically just a limited partnership profit-share model.
>
> Robert Croma sent me a great
ah, they're with UTA.
then they should be on tv soon...
thanks josh! catching up on emails and i owe u one asap
will check out the interview
On 10/3/07, Jill H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> weneedgirlfriends are my friends- as far as i know they pay for their
> own production, though i k
weneedgirlfriends are my friends- as far as i know they pay for their
own production, though i know they are trying to cut a tv deal- they
may have been picked up by a management team.
On 10/3/07, joshuajcohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> These guys definitely paid for it out of pocke
These guys definitely paid for it out of pocket, at least the first
half-dozen episodes. I've met the crew a few times in NYC - very cool
guys - and interviewed them back in June - http://tinyurl.com/393pwp -
right after they signed with UTA.
Awesome show. One of my favorites on the web.
- Jo
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Deirdre Straughan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried, but the map offers no labels to tell me what city I'm on or
> near, and I'm not so good at geography that I can pick New Delhi off a
> topographical map!
Yeah, Google has gotten a lot of heat for n
I tried, but the map offers no labels to tell me what city I'm on or
near, and I'm not so good at geography that I can pick New Delhi off a
topographical map!
--
best regards,
Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)
SPONSORED LINKS
Mapping vlogs is cool and all, but mapping individual video posts has
the potential to be much more compelling. So now there are two maps...
The original map of vlogs:
http://community.vlogmap.org/maps/worldmap
(Note, unclaimed vlogs are a dark maroon color, while vlogs that have
been claimed
How does that geovlogging on vlogmap work anyway? Maybe I've missed
something in the past, but could you explain it? Sorry if it's old news.
Dennis P
ymimexico.org/vlog
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "LeanBackVids.com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can geovlog here for now...
> h
They might not be easily sold on the idea, but what I would do is make
a tourist attraction vlog of your home city and try to get funding on
that. Perhaps even connect it to a tourist site in your area... they
might pick up on it.
Casey
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Moon" <[EMA
You can geovlog here for now...
http://community.vlogmap.org/maps/geovlogged
Whether you get paid to make the video is another issue, but soon
mobile devices combined with GeoRSS will revolutionize the way we
search/consume content. The advertising opportunities are like
nothing we've ever see
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "LeanBackVids.com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can everyone move the business/money talk over to the
> "videobloggingbusiness" group?
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videobloggingbusiness/
>
> It gets tiring reading about everyone's hopes to cash in on
v
> It's also blatantly obvious that 99% will never get paid
> any significant money, because that's exactly how blogging has already
> played out and it's exactly how podcasting and vlogging will play out.
> Actually, I'd bet in the end more like 99.9%, because frankly most
> people are not goin
The problem with seeing the history in that way is that there is never
actually a 'pure' rejection of any particular topic or idea here, its
just different human beings talking, arguing.
Perceptions differ. Personalities cloud the issues. A personal clash,
someone like me having a rant and bei
I used to have over one thousand unread, until I deleted them all.
Now I have just 12.
I have a new method for keeping up.
I have my videoblogging group messages go to a separate folder, as I
have always, but now I keep that folder sorted by subject.
So when I see a subject that I'm not in
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Otherwise, I'm perfectly happy to pack up my stuff and leave,
> because frankly this kind of attitude is getting on my last damn nerve.
> Clint
>
Don't get Clint angry. Nobody likes an angry Clint!
RAWR!
schlomo:)
cooper3acd wrote:
>
> By allowing a certain amount of biz talk within the group, the group
> has the opportunity to help mold the future of some of the
> businesses (at least the ones that have their ears open).
Agreed. I think the most important thing this group can do (besides
videoblog)
Well, we shouldn´t approach our last nerve regarding anything on this
list, in my opinion.
People have different perspectives. Within a few simple rules, like
"Don´t just send some press release to the mailing list", I think we
should be pretty liberal.
I agree with Clint: If you don´t like t
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Troy LeMaire"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I won't flame, I appreciate the link to the other group. You could
> have been a little smoother in your delivery, but it's not like you
> cussed someone out.
Yeah, timing and tact were never my strong points.
I won't flame, I appreciate the link to the other group. You could
have been a little smoother in your delivery, but it's not like you
cussed someone out.
Jay, maybe it would be good to put up links in the "Links" section
for other Yahoo Groups that are geared toward VLogging. This is th
My (biased) .02:
By allowing a certain amount of biz talk within the group, the group
has the opportunity to help mold the future of some of the
businesses (at least the ones that have their ears open).
Otherwise it does become truly an us/them situation.
BTW there will always be some "bus
LeanBackVids.com wrote:
>
> First of all, someone already got flamed for talking about money and
> they were suggested to create the other group. Here is her related
> rant
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videobloggingbusiness/message/112
>
> And for the record, I am not concerned about
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, at this point that's unnecessary. It amazes me that people
> subscribe to high volume mailing lists but ask for people to not talk
> about certain things, expecting that only the stuff they're interested
> in
Nathan Peters wrote:
>
> Everyone here has a digital camera. Everyone here happily went to work for
> some fucking corporation and got their paycheck and happily spent it on a
> digital camera made by some other corporation.
Actually, I thought I made it clear that I use an analog video ca
On Jul 17, 2005, at 10:40 AM, ryanne hodson wrote:
> i just don't want it to hinder people
> i don't want people to stop creating content because no one donates
I think for many people this won't be a problem. I see lots and lots
of people who do it just for the pleasure of doing it - See
hich just about every comment
I made can be drawn from.
http://www.waseskun.net/communities.html
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 1:26 PM
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Money Changers, out! (was: reality
ryanne hodson wrote:
>
> will money dictate content?
> i get scared that it will.
>
For some, yes. For most, probably not. Most people are not going to
get paid to vlog, and the ones that do get paid I only see better
content coming from it. The more time people have to devote to their
w
My point was that you were using the problems that a native community
had as an example of what happens if you dont have corporations. I was
merely suggesting that their problems are caused by many things
including the events of the past, eg having their old way of life
(where no corporation wa
Sorry, I should have said the native communities and reserves in BC.
Seriously. It's a huge social issue facing our province right now and the
communities have outright admitted that their traditional native practices
are not enough to solve their problems and are asking from help from the
po
way to continue trading without it being necessary for
every single
> person on the planet to have the exact item that everyone else
wanted. I
> fully support this system of economics.
>
> --
> Nathan Peters
> http://www.modernsingledad.com/
>
> It takes a big man to cr
to laugh at that man.
- Original Message -
From: "Halcyon Lujah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Money Changers, out! (was: reality check?)
> Money is just energy. Money is a resource.
YAHOO
On 7/17/05, ro9core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One things for sure, I'm not afraid and I'm ready to make some cool
> shit, not really for the people, but because it thrills me silly.
>
> Ro
AMEN!!
It makes me kindy tingly, too.
-Halcyon
"Thrilling myself silly"
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I totally understand your point, and agreed with you for most my life.
>
> But I am to a point where I want my art/passion/vision to be the main
> focus of my life. I don't want to work all week so I can vlog on
On 7/17/05, ro9core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And if you want to change the world, you need to let go of your
> > negative feelings towards making money. A REVOLUTION NEEDS
> > RESOURCES.
>
> the
> i think i am one of the first videobloggers to have
> gotten sponsorship in april.
> flat out money to make my videoblog
Congratulations!
> it's hard to feel ok about accepting money to create
Perhaps it will become more easy in time, money =
time. that's how I look at it.
> will money b
I agree with Robert: I wouldn't like to see "Support me!" every time I
see a vlog entry in for instance mefeedia. But, just like text ads, I
wouldn't mind it as much if it was visible, but clearly out of the
way.
Perhaps Josh, Peter and Jay could implement an alternative version
where for inst
Ah, Ryanne,
Money is anything we decide it is. That's its real catch.
I've decided my most valuable commodity is time.
What may I do for you in the next week?
Jan
--
"It isn't done alone"
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com
.
On Jul 17, 2005, at 11:40 AM, rya
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if you want to change the world, you need to let go of your
> negative feelings towards making money. A REVOLUTION NEEDS
> RESOURCES.
the problem fast becomes when you start charging for something, you
lose
> money is good
> money is bad
My 2cents:
Money is just energy. Money is a resource.
Spending money is a way of saying, "I want more of _ in the world."
And if you want to change the world, you need to let go of your
negative feelings towards making money. A REVOLUTION NEEDS
RESOUR
On Jul 17, 2005, at 10:40 AM, ryanne hodson wrote:
> money is good
> money is bad
amen.
>
> i think i am one of the first videobloggers to have gotten sponsorship
> in april.
> flat out money to make my videoblog
> of course i chose to contribute to more than that, (how could i
> possibly f
Heh. Yesterday when I suggested I'd like to see more donation buttons I
failed miserably in differentiating between toolmakers and content
makers. Sorry about that, been running on insufficient sleep.
In the case of toolmakers, to me it's an easy call, you transfer a
reasonable amount int
> http://www.momentshowing.net/momentshowing/2005/07/video_relpaymen.html
money is good
money is bad
so which is it?
i guess it's some of both
i think i am one of the first videobloggers to have gotten sponsorship in april.
flat out money to make my videoblog
of course i chose to contribute
Oh, yeah - just a mention of a product - as on radio - can constitute a
"commercial" but making motion pictures, that's where the big fun will
be.
Thanks for sharing the price point.
Jan
--
"It isn't done alone"
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com
.
On Jul 17,
Yea, I think that is where the 'fun' part comes in. :)
On Jul 17, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Jan McLaughlin wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Don't forget that you guys are producers and are capable of making
> commercials as well as being paid to show them.
>
> Jan
> --
> "It isn't done alone"
> http://fauxpres
Andrew,
Don't forget that you guys are producers and are capable of making
commercials as well as being paid to show them.
Jan
--
"It isn't done alone"
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com
.
On Jul 17, 2005, at 10:20 AM, andrew michael baron wrote:
> On Jul 17,
On Jul 17, 2005, at 3:53 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
>> I'd
>> like to see donation buttons on more tool dev sites. And I love the
>> spirit here in the group, that's the strongest currency.
>>
>
> http://www.momentshowing.net/momentshowing/2005/07/
> video_relpaymen.html
I think this sounds like
Things are changing, and I think we have reached a tipping point long
time ago: The masses are realizing that We Can. We don't need the
permission of the Church to communicate with God. We don't need the
permission from some CEO to create tools that work for US. Now we
don't need the permissio
> I'd
> like to see donation buttons on more tool dev sites. And I love the
> spirit here in the group, that's the strongest currency.
http://www.momentshowing.net/momentshowing/2005/07/video_relpaymen.html
--
http://www.momentshowing.net>
Adventures in Videoblogging
YAHOO
Heh. The for-profit media are about selling advertising and the
*nature* (cough cough, bias) of each media company is ruled by the
ownership. If someone wants to judge them and call for-profit media
evil, well, that's a judgement call. If for-profit media senses an
earning threat, as most a
out of existence. Just like young women, we have no idea of our power.
Jan
--
"It isn't done alone."
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com
- Original Message -
From: "Gena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 16,
ing@yahoogroups.com
>To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Money Changers, out! (was: reality check?)
>Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:31:27 -0500
>
>On Jul 16, 2005, at 11:17 AM, David Yirchott wrote:
>
> > But that isn't what people want. They wa
On Jul 16, 2005, at 11:17 AM, David Yirchott wrote:
> But that isn't what people want. They want sex and violence and
> sensationalism, etc. So what is a business supposed to do? Know your
> audience and deliver what they want.
That's what they'd have you believe. Not necessarily true.
http:
OTECTED]>
>Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Money Changers, out! (was: reality check?)
>Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:15:30 -
>
>I gotta jump in on this. I am old enough to make distinctions:
>
>Altruis
On 7/16/05, Gena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But is it compatible with the current state of video blogging? With
> this group? Can we learn from each other? Or, once they get the lay of
> the land, will they shut us out or restrict what we can and can't
> do?
They who? Who _could_ shut "us"
I gotta jump in on this. I am old enough to make distinctions:
Altruism does not have to = poverty.
Corporations does not = evil.
But Deirdre, the motivations of corporations are different than a
group of individuals trying to accomplish a community goal. This is
not wrong or evil. It is what
ice of video blogging?
**BTW, just to clarify: I DO NOT think anyone on this board is like
Hitler or any other dictator, those comments were used to illustrate a
point.**
-David
>From: "Chuck Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>To: v
> At the same time, I've had conversations with corporate people
> about vlogs that ultimately revolve around one thing: MONEY.
> "how can we milk this sucker."
We can't generalize that everyone who works in coorporations has $$ as
their first priority, but the way coorporations are set up (
Dierdre,
It's easy to poke at corporations because they're faceless entities,
and yet of you rightly point out that's a falsehood. Of course
there are lots of good people working for corporations - most
of the western world I suppose.
At the same time, I've had conversations with corporate p
57 matches
Mail list logo
