Hi Christine
My understanding of USCode Section 108 is that if your titles are deteriorating
and unavailable for purchase or streaming in new condition, you can simply make
preservation copies. You don't need to seek permission. There are caveats
(in-library use only, etc.), but you can do
*Posted to multiple lists. Please excuse the duplication*
Dear collective wisdom:
I have a patron interested in how much it cost to license (i.e. total licensing
fees per song) a number of specific pop songs for 4 smallish independent films
released between 2008-2014 (Drive, Bronson, Lawrence
Greetings, everyone
I second this interpretation by Deg. There is nothing in 108 that specifies a
film must "already be in the collection" (if that were the case, then already
in the collection since... when?). There is so much misinformation about this
stuff, especially, at times, from
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
TODAY!<http://milestonefilms.us3.list-manage1.com/subscribe/post?u=4a0b9e434a9f3e8603c29806e=f30d1906e2>
Support us on
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Milestone-Film/22348485426> and
Twitter<https://twitter.com/#!/MilestoneFilms>!
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8
Hi Anna
This issue crops up in various forms fairly frequently. First, however, a
minor point of clarification. Classroom screenings are actually NOT “fair use”
(17 U.S. Code § 107)https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 but rather
fall under a different section of the USCode relating
Hello everyone,
Ms. Rosner's description of the ARL position is, as usual, simplistic and
ultimately erroneous. ARL does not simply claim that you can stream an entire
film for class purposes without taking any other factors into account. Among
the other limitations, in Best Practices
they trusted and sadly because of financial pressures from the top
more institutions seem to do this
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Simpkins, Terry W.
tsimp...@middlebury.edumailto:tsimp...@middlebury.edu wrote:
Hello everyone,
Ms. Rosner's description of the ARL position is, as usual
Hi Jared,
At the risk of stirring the pot… for another viewpoint take a look at the ARL
Code of Best Practices In Fair Use For Academic and Research Libraries,
specifically this section:
http://www.arl.org/pp/ppcopyright/codefairuse/code/three-digitizing.shtml
Remember that this is not a
Dear list,
Many of the questions people are posing with respect to the ARL code could be
solved by, radical as this idea may be, actually reading the code. However,
since it's apparently much easier to complain than to learn, I will summarize
what the code actually says on this issue.
The
Hello everyone,
Jessica Rosner asks If you ... are sincere that you are not the enemy of
content owners, how bout a simple and CLEAR statement that fair use' does NOT
cover the use of feature material being assigned to classes.
I am not one of the authors of the guidelines, but I can imagine
Hi everyone,
Long time reader, and though I haven't posted much before, I can't let some of
these comments pass unremarked.
I trust the irony of Ms. Rosner complaining about the demonization of rights
holders while lumping internet pirates and library groups in the same
sentence was
11 matches
Mail list logo
