ursday, September 30, 2010 10:26 AM
>To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
>Subject: Re: [Videolib] Preservation vs. prohibitions on duplication
>
>�
>
>Is there somewhere I can read up on this? If they are not covered by US
>copyright law, what are they covered by ?
>
>
>
>
>
Services
>
> University of Arizona Libraries
>
> brew...@u.library.arizona.edu
>
>
>
> *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
> videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:26 AM
>
> *To:* videolib@li
AM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Preservation vs. prohibitions on duplication
Is there somewhere I can read up on this? If they are not covered by US
copyright law, what are they covered by ?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Brewer, Michael
mailto:brew...@u.library.arizo
30, 2010 10:02 AM
> *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] Preservation vs. prohibitions on duplication
>
>
>
> I would have to read the report itself but copyright law does not in any
> way prevent the PRESERVATION of audio recordings. In fact the section
r
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:02 AM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Preservation vs. prohibitions on duplication
I would have to read the report itself but copyright law does not in any way
prevent the PRESERVATION of audio recordings. In fact the section of everyone
I would have to read the report itself but copyright law does not in any way
prevent the PRESERVATION of audio recordings. In fact the section of
everyone keeps going to justify making a copy of deteriorating work was
written for audio recordings. What the law does do is prevent the preserved
work
I thought this was interesting, focusing on audio recordings and the
preservation vs. copyright situation.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_endangered_digital_recordings
judy
Judith P. Shoaf
Director, Language Learning Center
University of Florida
PO 117300
Gainesville, Florida 32611
352-392-2112
