Good call on the mental margarita. It is past noon and I'm ready for a
derivative, transformative mojito.
Sent from my iPhone
757.279.8871
On Feb 23, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Dennis Doros
milefi...@gmail.commailto:milefi...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going to stay out of this -- I think VideoLib has
Hi-
Does anyone know if the Video at Risk project (dealing with reformatting of VHS
tapes) has a relationship with the new ARL Code of Best Practices
undertaking ? Have there been a conversation between these parties?
Just Curious.
Thanks.
Debra
Debra H. Mandel,
Head, Digital Media Design
Hi Debra
Berkeley is a principle partner in this project (along with NYU). A
significant part of the project will be identifying materials in
collections which are eligible for reformatting, primarily under the
provisions of Section 108, but possibly under the mantle of fair use, as
well.
None
Gary,
Does this project have a proposed date to share its list of identified
materials?
Thanks,
Gail
On 2/23/2012 10:36 AM, ghand...@library.berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi Debra
Berkeley is a principle partner in this project (along with NYU). A
significant part of the project will be identifying
The project runs thru June--i.e. the second phase, which will produce
lists of materials identified as possible 108 candidates in the
collections of the partner insitutions (NYU/Avery Fisher; UCB MRC; and
Loyola University in New Orleans)... (The last phase is to develop an RFP
that defines
Gary.
I know I have mentioned this before but never directly asked you, is it
your belief that in determining if an item is rare and should be
preserved that no effort should ever be made to contact the rights
holder/filmmaker? I ask because that is exactly what one of the top NYU
people told a
Dear list,
Many of the questions people are posing with respect to the ARL code could be
solved by, radical as this idea may be, actually reading the code. However,
since it's apparently much easier to complain than to learn, I will summarize
what the code actually says on this issue.
The
Jessica, don't make me come over there and...
What makes you think we're gonna be perfunctory in doing due diligence?
Yes...we have developed a fairly elaborate template which takes a search
thru thorough online searches in a number of databases; vendor sites;
contacting producer and/or director
Jessica,
Was that Howard Besser who said that at the ALA meeting?
Elizabeth
From: Jessica Rosner jessicapros...@gmail.com
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Videolib] Video at Risk's Relationship to new ARL Code of Best
Practices
Gary.
I
Actually what you have listed below is not what is in 108 but a clever
version reworded to justify certain activities as fair use First it
does not say likely to deteriorate it says it applies to copy that
IS ( emphasis mine) damaged deteriorating, lost or stolen. There is
HUGE difference between
Well Gary all I can say is you have someone and their institution
(NYU) who don't believe that. I can't really repeat some of the things
I know but I will go out on a limb and say NYU has routinely streamed
films many of which were not from standard legal sources so having
them as a top member or
You're probably talking about Howard, Jessica. Stop it, already...you're
obsessing.
The project has a very competent and level-headed media lawyer on board,
and we're taking our cues from him.
Gary
Well Gary all I can say is you have someone and their institution
(NYU) who don't believe
I was going to stay out of this -- I think VideoLib has become too
adversary and everybody needs to step back and have a mental margarita --
but I believe that Jessica (a graduate of Francis W. Parker School which is
much in the news today because the death of a producer of mine) has
produced a
tell you what, I will stop it re your project but NOT about the
code and other activities. Of course I am obsessing I literally lost
my job because of this so I get sensitive.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:00 PM, ghand...@library.berkeley.edu wrote:
You're probably talking about Howard, Jessica.
That's three copies, Dennis..cf 108.b and 108c
and secondly...we seem to be conflating issues of fair use with Section
108. These are not the same thing... and we are not advocating disregard
for the provisions of this section.
and I agree we need to tone it down a notch.
gary
I was going
??? . This what you wrote The principle: It is fair use to make
digital copies of collection items that are likely to deteriorate, or
that exist only in difficult-to-access formats, for purposes of
preservation, and to make those copies available as surrogates for
fragile or otherwise inaccessible
16 matches
Mail list logo
