Well - as you say - we have been over this innumerable times before.
First and foremost I would say that - as far as we know - campanellas have
nothing to do with the method of stringing one might chose to use.
Everyone just misunderstands what Sanz says about this. He doesn't say
that
Also well - I can't really agree with yr assertion that campanellas
have 'nothing to do with the stringing': if both lower courses were in
unison at the lower octave I think that even my 'Old Ones' (not
'ancients'!) would have raised an eyebrow or two..
Martyn
--- On Wed,
Monica Hall wrote:
Having looked at the piece of music in question now, I can see that in
this instance you are objecting to the fact that the note the arrow
points to is duplicated an octave above. I think the point is that
he has put it on the 4th course rather than at the 2nd fret on the
