It seems to me that Vihuela should be incorporated with the lute list
as the instruments are almost the same except for the body shape.
Baroque guitar, while looking superficially like a vihuela is quite a
different beast.
For myself, I'd be happy to discuss all, including Baroque & Medieval
At 03:48 PM 9/6/2005, Arto Wikla wrote:
>Dear Wayne and all,
>
>I really would not like to be without the infinite - but very good
>and informative! - discussion about the "bourdons and re-entrantness" of
>the 5 course baroque guitar by Monica, Lex et al.! And perhaps there
>will be more vihuela t
Dear Wayne and all,
I really would not like to be without the infinite - but very good
and informative! - discussion about the "bourdons and re-entrantness" of
the 5 course baroque guitar by Monica, Lex et al.! And perhaps there
will be more vihuela talk, too? Also interesting. But I think the
on further reflection i think the name "vihuela"
should stay. a list of a new name will only invite a
further exchange of "is it or isn't it? ..." and -
should i be accepted - another round of speciesist
charango bashing.
as it is, whenever "vihuela" is mentioned we can each
assume we're tal
> There is certainly the possibility of that. So far the vihuela and baroque
> guitar community have got along fine, except for the stupid
> attack by RT on
> Matanya, which led to Matanya leaving the list to the general
> loss. I can't
> recall another contribution by RT since that time other th
> When Wayne informed me of the interest in expanding the topic to include
> 19th-century guitar, I said 'OK, but why not call it
> earlyguitar?'. But now
> I can see that he is worried about an influx of members and flame wars.
> There is certainly the possibility of that. So far the vihuela and b
> I vote for Baroque guitar. Early guitar could even be Villa-Lobos on gut
> strings.
> Lex
I second that - never could abide Giuliani - heresy I know.
Monica
>
>
>
> >
> > Hi folks -
> >
> > There is currently a discussion on the lute list
> > concerning Beethoven and Giuliani which rea
UT - it is not my list. Do as you please, Wayne. It is all yours.
Rob MacKillop
-Original Message-
From: Eugene C. Braig IV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 September 2005 16:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: proposed name change
My personal prefe
- Original Message -
From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Vihuela Net"
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 6:04 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: proposed name change
>
> 'Early Guitar' please Wayne, otherwise we m
11:47:29 -0400
> To: "Fossum, Arthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
> From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: proposed name change
>
> At 11:40 AM 9/6/2005, Fossum, Arthur wrote:
> >As far as lists for
At 12:25 PM 9/6/2005, apsu wrote:
>I concur with Eugene (how's your darts play coming along, Eugene?)
As badly as ever. I hope to see you in Oberlin to prove it.
Eugene
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
;. What do you
think?
-Original Message-
From: Martyn Hodgson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:12 PM
To: Vihuela Net
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: proposed name change
I agree with Eugene (see blw), there are no lists as far as I can see on
which one would find,
An 'early guitar' list will probably not attract the 'mainstream' modern
> guitar players and allow us to develop areas of overlap.
>
> Why not give it a probationery period?
>
> Martyn
>
> "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
i think you're all being beastly.
i'm here for the music - regardless of one's
chordaphone of choice (call it what you will) and some
e-bonhomie.
high five - bill
"and thus i made...a small vihuela from the shell of a creepy crawly..." - Don
Gonzalo de Guerrero (1512), "Historias de la Conq
gene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 11:47:29 -0400
To: "Fossum, Arthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: proposed name change
At 11:40 AM 9/6
At 12:02 PM 9/6/2005, Wayne Cripps wrote:
>A, but you see, I do all the work. That is, I delete
>bad addresses from the list, check to be sure the spam filters
>didn't catch anyone's valis message, do any necessary programming.
>It was Rob's idea, and he rounded up members, but the day to
>day
'Early Guitar' please Wayne, otherwise we might find people reluctant to put
anything on except baroque guitar.
Martyn
Wayne Cripps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks -
There is currently a discussion on the lute list
concerning Beethoven and Giuliani which really has nothing
to do with l
> From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> At 11:49 AM 9/6/2005, Wayne Cripps wrote:
> >So I know a bit about lutes, but I have no clues about anything about
> >baroque guitars and early romantic guitars. That means that I would
> >not be in any kind of position to suggest that postings
> Anyone else want to start an early romantic guitar list? I am
> afraid that my system is not set up to let another person
> work in a list. It is not manager-friendly.
>
>
> Wayne
The easiest thing is to start a new romantic guitar community on
http://livejournal.com
RT
_
At 11:49 AM 9/6/2005, Wayne Cripps wrote:
>So I know a bit about lutes, but I have no clues about anything about
>baroque guitars and early romantic guitars. That means that I would
>not be in any kind of position to suggest that postings were not
>appropriate, etc.
>
> Anyone else want to start
> From: Lex Eisenhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> There used to be the CGH-list, moderated (indirectly) by Matanya Ophee.
> There used to be a lot of traffic. After a Big Bang the list died. I even
> never unsubscribed. I'm afraid a new Romantic Guitar list will become a
> battlefield.
I don't wan
At 11:40 AM 9/6/2005, Fossum, Arthur wrote:
>As far as lists for CG there are two yahoo lists, there is the cg-hist
>list, the Eskimo list. All of these could cover 19th century performing
>practice etc.
All these could...but don't. I am on several guitar forums and serve as a
moderator of one.
TED]; vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: proposed name change
At 11:12 AM 9/6/2005, Fossum, Arthur wrote:
>Let's call it [CHARANGO] :)...
>I vote to keep it [VIHUELA]. There are plenty of other lists for
>Guitar, where Sor and Giuliani are more on topic.
>So far I feel the l
> Let's call it [CHARANGO] :)...
> I vote to keep it [VIHUELA].
Seconded.
RT
> There are plenty of other lists for
> Guitar, where Sor and Giuliani are more on topic.
> So far I feel the list is doing great and usually can't wait to get home
> from work to play through all the examples...
>
>
At 11:12 AM 9/6/2005, Fossum, Arthur wrote:
>Let's call it [CHARANGO] :)...
>I vote to keep it [VIHUELA]. There are plenty of other lists for
>Guitar, where Sor and Giuliani are more on topic.
>So far I feel the list is doing great and usually can't wait to get home
>from work to play through all
> I have no way of knowing, but I suspect a list to explicitly include guitar
> into the 19th c. will not attract too many more than the list named
> "vihuela" has already. Where you find numbers of guitarists, in the ranks
> of amateur modern classical guitarists, they seem to have precious l
At 10:46 AM 9/6/2005, Lex Eisenhardt wrote:
>I vote for Baroque guitar. Early guitar could even be Villa-Lobos on gut
>strings.
>Lex
Frankly, if somebody does have interest in gut-strung guitars into the
early 20th c., there aren't many, if any, electronic forums to address
it. The world is fu
At 10:38 AM 9/6/2005, Wayne Cripps wrote:
> For my part, I am near to the limit of mail lists
>that I can manage. I have this fear that if I start an
>EARLY-GUITAR list that it will soon get many subscribers and
>take too much time and energy to manage. But I don't really
>know how many people
Or BIGUELA, as a compromise.
RT
> I vote for Baroque guitar. Early guitar could even be Villa-Lobos on gut
> strings.
> Lex
>
>
>
> >
> > Hi folks -
> >
> > There is currently a discussion on the lute list
> > concerning Beethoven and Giuliani which really has nothing
> > to do with lutes. I
> Since you folks are all charter members, I would like
> to put this before you. Do you think EARLY-GUITAR is
> appropriate, or would you rather limit it to maybe
> BAROQUE-GUITAR and let the early-romantic types
> find their own outlet?
AbsoLUTEly. We travelled far to get away from Biedermeier
I vote for Baroque guitar. Early guitar could even be Villa-Lobos on gut
strings.
Lex
>
> Hi folks -
>
> There is currently a discussion on the lute list
> concerning Beethoven and Giuliani which really has nothing
> to do with lutes. I would like to move the discussion to this
> list, the V
31 matches
Mail list logo
