Steve Hall wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 22:45 +0100, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
BTW, the sizes, datestamps, and versions I have are currently:
18444 8-Jan 21:57 autoload/vimball.vimversion: 21
5786 8-Jan 21:57 doc/pi_vimball.txt 2007-Jan-03
1657 9-Oct 21:36 plugin
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 22:45 +0100, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
>
> BTW, the sizes, datestamps, and versions I have are currently:
>
> 18444 8-Jan 21:57 autoload/vimball.vimversion: 21
>5786 8-Jan 21:57 doc/pi_vimball.txt 2007-Jan-03
>1657 9-Oct 21:36 plugin/vimball
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
[...]
> >
> > These are the filenames, folding brackets and all!
>
> This is an example of not following the directions, which state: you
> need a new vimball plugin!
Somebody needs to commun
Hi Steve, Dr Chip, Tony,
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > --
> > $ ls -R1 ./*
> >
> > ./netrw.vba
> >
> > ./autoload:
> > netrwFileHandlers.vim?[[[1
> > netrwSettings.vim?[[[1
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
$ ls -R1 ./*
./netrw.vba
./autoload:
netrwFileHandlers.vim?[[[1
netrwSettings.vim?[[[1
netrw.vim?[[[1
./doc:
pi_netrw.txt?[[[1
./plugin:
netrwPlugin.vim?[[[1
./syntax:
netr
Quoting Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --
> $ ls -R1 ./*
>
> ./netrw.vba
>
> ./autoload:
> netrwFileHandlers.vim?[[[1
> netrwSettings.vim?[[[1
> netrw.vim?[[[1
>
> ./doc:
> pi_netrw.txt?[[[1
>
> ./plugin:
> netrwPlugin.vim?[[[1
>
> ./syntax:
>
Steve Hall wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:03 +0100, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Sure. But you don't _have_ to source it. Since 15 June 2006, you can
use instead
:UseVimball /temp
Tony, you convinced me to try again. But I feel vindicated, again I
experienced the same kind of issues I alway
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:03 +0100, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
>
> Sure. But you don't _have_ to source it. Since 15 June 2006, you can
> use instead
>
> :UseVimball /temp
Tony, you convinced me to try again. But I feel vindicated, again I
experienced the same kind of issues I always seem to hav
Steve Hall wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 13:26 -0500, fREW wrote:
Isn't a vimball just another archive? It seems, according to the
vimball help file that it's just a bunch of inert files. It doesn't
really run anything... Maybe I am wrong, though.
When you use :source filename, Vim executes
Steve Hall wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:33 +0100, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Steve Hall wrote:
Unfortunately these appear distributed in vimball format only.
The vimball format is actually a text format.
No, vimball is an amalgamation of text files, but it is NOT intended
to be edited in situ
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 13:26 -0500, fREW wrote:
> Isn't a vimball just another archive? It seems, according to the
> vimball help file that it's just a bunch of inert files. It doesn't
> really run anything... Maybe I am wrong, though.
When you use :source filename, Vim executes the code in file
Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2007-03-16, "A.J.Mechelynck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is how to avoid "modifying system files": Since there is a test at the
start of the netrw scripts to avoid double sourcing, you can test them by
unvimballing them under $VIM/vimfiles, $HOME/vimfiles or $HOME/.v
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:33 +0100, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> Steve Hall wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately these appear distributed in vimball format only.
>
> The vimball format is actually a text format.
No, vimball is an amalgamation of text files, but it is NOT intended
to be edited in situ like a
On 2007-03-16, "A.J.Mechelynck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is how to avoid "modifying system files": Since there is a test at the
> start of the netrw scripts to avoid double sourcing, you can test them by
> unvimballing them under $VIM/vimfiles, $HOME/vimfiles or $HOME/.vim,
> without r
Steve Hall wrote:
From: Charles E Campbell Jr, Fri, March 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Please try netrw v108l which I just put on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#NETRW
Unfortunately these appear distributed in vimball format only.
It is unrealistic to expect users to fire
Isn't a vimball just another archive? It seems, according to the
vimball help file that it's just a bunch of inert files. It doesn't
really run anything... Maybe I am wrong, though.
-fREW
On 3/16/07, Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Charles E Campbell Jr, Fri, March 16, 2007 12:17
From: Charles E Campbell Jr, Fri, March 16, 2007 12:17 pm
>
> Please try netrw v108l which I just put on my website:
> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#NETRW
Unfortunately these appear distributed in vimball format only.
It is unrealistic to expect users to fire off a home-brew
Brian Neal wrote:
I just downloaded the non-Cream pre-built Vim for Windows (version
7.0.215). The "go up" command (-) in the Netrw plugin no longer seems
to work. Neither the - command or putting the cursor over the ../ and
hitting return does anything anymore. Any ideas? Thanks.
Please try ne
From: Mark Woodward , Fri, March 16, 2007 5:50 am
> On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 09:41 -0500, Brian Neal wrote:
> >
> > I just downloaded the non-Cream pre-built Vim for Windows (version
> > 7.0.215). The "go up" command (-) in the Netrw plugin no longer
> > seems to work. Neither the - command or puttin
Hi all,
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 09:41 -0500, Brian Neal wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I just downloaded the non-Cream pre-built Vim for Windows (version
> 7.0.215). The "go up" command (-) in the Netrw plugin no longer seems
> to work. Neither the - command or putting the cursor over the ../ and
> hitting retu
Hi -
I just downloaded the non-Cream pre-built Vim for Windows (version
7.0.215). The "go up" command (-) in the Netrw plugin no longer seems
to work. Neither the - command or putting the cursor over the ../ and
hitting return does anything anymore. Any ideas? Thanks.
21 matches
Mail list logo
