RE: Bug i_CTRL-X s and arrow

2006-05-11 Thread Suresh Govindachar
{Added postscript to what I sent a few minutes ago.] Gerald Lai wrote: On Wed, 10 May 2006, Suresh Govindachar wrote: Bram Moolenaar wrote: Suresh Govindachar wrote: version 7.0.1 gvim --noplugin -u NONE -U NONE and type ifooey and do i_CTRL-X s Message at

Re: Bug i_CTRL-X s and arrow

2006-05-11 Thread Edward Wong
Hi Suresh, I'm assuming you have: set cot=menu,preview by default. 1) UP -- just doing 1 UP -- after i_CTRL-X s actually inserts an entry -- Bram says it will not, but it does in fact. Moreover, even though the message at the bottom says Bram's intent Back at original, the

Re: Bug i_CTRL-X s and arrow

2006-05-11 Thread Edward Wong
oh dearI just realize I kept saying omni this and omni that when I read the thread again! Please forgive my stupidity and ignore any word about omni...it should be completion, IT IS *i_ctrl-x_s*. I should stop working and go home. :)

RE: Bug i_CTRL-X s and arrow

2006-05-11 Thread Gerald Lai
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Suresh Govindachar wrote: [snip] Confirmed for 7.0 release. It seems that i_up-arrow i_down-arrow work un-intuitively as compared to i_ctrl-p i_ctrl-n, respectively. Not exactly -- the bug is _NOT_ un-intutiveness. To both Suresh and Edward: please read my

RE: Bug i_CTRL-X s and arrow

2006-05-11 Thread Suresh Govindachar
I have finally correctly understood Bram's intent regarding what can happen after i_CTRL s and things indeed work that way. --Suresh

RE: Bug i_CTRL-X s and arrow

2006-05-10 Thread Suresh Govindachar
Bram Moolenaar wrote: Suresh Govindachar wrote: version 7.0.1 gvim --noplugin -u NONE -U NONE and type ifooey and do i_CTRL-X s Message at bottom will say: match 1 of 100 I get Spell checking is not enabled. Did you do :set spell? Yes, I did :set spell before