Re: Running :bufdo with eventignore=all

2006-04-17 Thread Eric Arnold
Re-opening the buffer doesn't necessarily issue a FileType event. I found that if I *changed* the filetype explicitly, then the syntax returned to normal. I'm guessing that the "state leftover" is that it has simply missed the reason to update its syntax, and won't update until it is given anothe

Re: Running :bufdo with eventignore=all

2006-04-17 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 at 5:08pm, Eric Arnold wrote: > This is because you are ignoring the "filetype" event. > > Try a "doautoall FileType" when you're done. > Thanks, this means I can use :bufdo doautocmd FileType syntax, because I also use :windo and :argdo in place of :bufdo. I still wonder wh

Re: Running :bufdo with eventignore=all

2006-04-17 Thread Eric Arnold
This is because you are ignoring the "filetype" event. Try a "doautoall FileType" when you're done. On 4/17/06, Hari Krishna Dara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my script, I am running a :bufdo command with eventignore=all because > of two main reasons: > - performs better as I am not trigge

Running :bufdo with eventignore=all

2006-04-17 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
In my script, I am running a :bufdo command with eventignore=all because of two main reasons: - performs better as I am not triggering any events. - doesn't interfere with plugins that deal with MRU buffer lists. This however leaves a side effect after the command is run. All the buffer go into s