Yakov Lerner wrote:
Is it possible to add this item to the vim voting list ?:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
-- Ability of N instances of vim to absorb, merge and show changes
to the same file made by other running vim instances [ either by reading
other vim's
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:43:14PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
Is it possible to add this item to the vim voting list ?:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
-- Ability of N instances of vim to absorb, merge and show changes
to the same file
Odd, I got this here, but not from the vimlist...
Couldn't the 'patch' command do this? E.g., Vim#1 has made some
changes to
example.c (but not saved them), and Vim#2 makes some different changes
and
...
Shouldn't this be possible through the autocommands? I think you could
write
this as a
I can't think of any valid reason why one lonely user - me for
instance
- would want to fire up several instances of vim to edit the same
file.
It can be. For example, in LNX user can edit file in text console,
then switch to X11 and then start editor again to edit the same file,
forgetting that
On 4/23/07, Gene Kwiecinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't think of any valid reason why one lonely user - me for
instance
- would want to fire up several instances of vim to edit the same
file.
It can be. For example, in LNX user can edit file in text console,
then switch to X11 and then
I'd be seriously uncomfortable with that as a feature. Imagine
absentmindedly editing the same file 2x or more. Make some changes in
one instance, make different changes in another instance, save/quit
the
first, save/quit the second, trash all the edits made in the first
instance.
In the
Hello,
Couldn't the 'patch' command do this? E.g., Vim#1 has made some changes to
example.c (but not saved them), and Vim#2 makes some different changes and
saves them. Vim#1 sees that example.c has changed, and makes a diff between
the new example.c and what it originally was, and also makes a
On 4/20/07, cga2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
[there was some text]
See the screen(1) man page and search for multi.
Are you (Is he) talking about several users concurrently modifying the
same file(s) .. possibly from different geographic
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:55:33PM EDT, Andrew Maykov wrote:
On 4/20/07, cga2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
[there was some text]
See the screen(1) man page and search for multi.
Are you (Is he) talking about several users concurrently
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:09:38PM EDT, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2007-04-11, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bram,
Is it possible to add this item to the vim voting list ?:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
-- Ability of N instances of vim to absorb,
I put some thought into why you would need this. And I would suggest.
Use a source repository such as svn.
create a branch for each machine
map a command that commits the file on save on machine1
map a command that displays the patch of the svn diff of the branch of
machine1 on machine2 in a
On 2007-04-11, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bram,
Is it possible to add this item to the vim voting list ?:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
-- Ability of N instances of vim to absorb, merge and show changes
to the same file made by other running vim
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:09:38PM EDT, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2007-04-11, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bram,
Is it possible to add this item to the vim voting list ?:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
-- Ability of N instances of vim to absorb,
Hello Bram,
Is it possible to add this item to the vim voting list ?:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
-- Ability of N instances of vim to absorb, merge and show changes
to the same file made by other running vim instances [ either by reading
other vim's swapfiles, or
Hello Bram,
Is it possible to add this item to the vim voting list ?:
collaboration of N vim instances editing same file
-- Ability of N instances of vim to absorb, merge and show changes
to the same file made by other running vim instances [ either by reading
other vim's swapfiles, or
Hello Yakov,
Couldn't you hook into the FileChangedShell autocmd event and merge the changes
into your buffer from there? You can also handle the swap file message with
SwapExists event.
regards,
Peter
--- Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bram,
Is it possible to add this item to
16 matches
Mail list logo
