On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:07:49PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2006-06-07, Jared <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 06/07/2006 15:10, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2006-06-07, Jared <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I haven't been following this discussion very closely, but I just
> > > tried the
On 2006-06-07, Jared <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/07/2006 15:10, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2006-06-07, Jared <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't been following this discussion very closely, but I just
> > tried the experiment on Red Hat Linux 9, SunOS 5.8 and Windows XP
> > with vim 7
On 06/07/2006 15:10, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2006-06-07, Jared <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been following this discussion very closely, but I just
> tried the experiment on Red Hat Linux 9, SunOS 5.8 and Windows XP
> with vim 7.0, no patches, and the cursor always goes to the 'o' in
William S Fulton wrote:
[...]
Just need spare time mate, but the SUSE guys have beat me to it already!
There is a buffer overrun, all the gory details here:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182212
It was reported as affecting vim 7 too.
William
Interesting... Notice the SuSE
Benji Fisher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:27:12PM +0100, William S Fulton wrote:
>> The version of gvim shipped with Suse 10.1 crashes when using the mouse.
>> I've filed a bug: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182212,
>> but here is the stack trace again (below). Any suggestions
On 2006-06-07, Jared <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/06/2006 23:47, Benji Fisher wrote:
> > I am stumped. I tried it with
> >
> > $ vim -u NONE
> > :set nocp
> > :runtime plugin/matchparen.vim
> >
> > and I still get the cursor on the "o" in the third line.
>
> Benji, Ilya,
>
> I appreciate
Tony
>> But if I invoke the Taskmanager by pressing Ctrl-Alt_Delete,
>> then I observe a gvim zombie hanging around within the task
>> list.
>>
> If it doesn't happen when you build with Big features (and an
> otherwise identical configuration), then the only difference
> between Big and Hige is
Yakov
> ... That's why re-sending helps.
>
Thanks again! Yes, I experienced that once or twice too. But this
time, waiting one night didn't help, so I thought it stays like that
for ever: I am receiving mails, can't reply nor unsubscribe nor
influence in any way what's going on. This is why I was
On 6/7/06, Mathias Michaelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for reply -- I appreciate that also those nasty problems are
discussed seriously. But anyway: I don't write HTML emails, I turn this
(un-)feature off where ever it is possible. So this explanation can be excluded.
Thinking about it
Tony
> > I found that emails that are written on my Thunderbird Email
> > Client AND where addressed to vim-dev@vim.org ... were filtered
> > away, ...
> >
> There may be an explanation to that: Thunderbird writes its mail in HTML
> by default, ...
>
Thanks for reply -- I appreciate that also t
Mathias Michaelis wrote:
Dear developers
I observe the following strange behaviour of gvim 7.0 on Windows XP
built with HUGE features by my own:
I open gvim.exe, work with it or leave it without touching it for
half an hour. Then, within gvim.exe, I type ":q" or ":wq". gvim
saves the text, remo
On 6/7/06, Mathias Michaelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My emails are systematically filtered out.
Find the 'plaintext' option in your Thunderbird client, and
use it when you send to mailing list.
I thought mailinglist filter was supposed to bounce
back to you the html-formatted message in
Mathias Michaelis wrote:
[...]
But: You don't see no of my mails written yesterday, and also not
all from this morning. The testmail written at 09:03:28 +0200 is not
from me, but from my Email-Provider. I found that emails that are
written on my Thunderbird Email Client AND where addressed to
vim
Hello Matthew, dear developers
>> My emails are systematically filtered out.
>>
> I'm seeing your messages on the list.
>
First: Thanks for replying so fast!
But: You don't see no of my mails written yesterday, and also not
all from this morning. The testmail written at 09:03:28 +0200 is not
from
James Vega wrote:
[...]
I was more pointing this out for informational purposes instead of
trying to push you to continue producing win32 versions of Vim. :)
James
Ah, that lifts a great weight off my heart. ;-) Especially now that I
heard from Steve Hall that the reason he had stopped pr
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Mathias Michaelis wrote:
> My emails are systematically filtered out. I can't even unsubscribe
> (why be on a list where own, very carefully composed contributions
> aren't desired?). I already have phoned to my ISP, and he's innocent.
I'm seeing your mess
Dear developers
I observe the following strange behaviour of gvim 7.0 on Windows XP
built with HUGE features by my own:
I open gvim.exe, work with it or leave it without touching it for
half an hour. Then, within gvim.exe, I type ":q" or ":wq". gvim
saves the text, remove the .swp file and closes
testmail
Dear developers
My emails are systematically filtered out. I can't even unsubscribe (why be on
a list where own, very carefully composed contributions aren't desired?). I
already have phoned to my ISP, and he's innocent. Now I am really helpless. If
this email reaches the list, I will once more
testmail
Webmail TcNet GmbH http://www.tcnet.ch
testmail
21 matches
Mail list logo
