Re: tip comment pollution

2007-01-04 Thread Charles Paul
Aloha, I see that there is a post on vimonline mailing list about this: https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31341207&forum_id=1699 Kinda spooky, eh? If needed, I'd love to see how I could help out. I have some PHP know-how; is there an IRC channel where vimonline people idl

tip comment pollution

2007-01-04 Thread Charles E Campbell Jr
Hello! Looks like the spammers have been adding their pollution to the tips. Our (unfortunately) hardworking tip inspectors have been getting rid of new spamtips, but the spammers have now started using the "Additional Notes" process. I note that many of my own tips seem to have four or mor

Re: problem with taglist plugin

2007-01-04 Thread flyfish
i got it and installed successfully, thank you very much flyfish wrote: > > hi, > > i have used vim for some days and i would like to use the taglist plugin > which is very hot in internet, my os is ubuntu 6 and the version of vim is > 7, i downloaded the taglist package and unziped it, then

Re: Apparent Vim 7.0 bug (re comments)

2007-01-04 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Robert Lee wrote: I have a gvim 7.0 (win32 with +comments) that seems to be ignoring the "set comments" line in my .vimrc file. I can submit the entire .vimrc file if desired but the relevant line is: set comments=s:/**,mb:*,ex:*/ What I get is this (vim default?): /* ** ** */ and what I ex

RE: Does 'man' syntax do its job?

2007-01-04 Thread Vince Negri
James Vega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the other hand, integrating the [conceal] patch would provide a solution for various itches that I know people want to scratch (mainly to do with builtin previewing of filetypes like html, tex, etc). If it were disabled by default (as I think folding