Robert Lee wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, what I'm asking it
to do currently rarely takes much time, but it could be really nice
to ask
it to do a lot more and still not pay a huge time or memory penalty.
What
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:10:20 -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
just to change the color scheme or keyboard mappings. Yes, this will
break backwards
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:02:39 +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Andy Wokula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as function arguments are read-only, it is good to have
the a: modifier.
In fact, why are they read-only, although call is by value?
Yes, that's the reason for the a:
Am Dienstag, den 24.04.2007, 16:46 +0530 schrieb Nageshwar M:
I tried all the options I checked :version and there is this line
with OLE support. I tried to run the application from python as said
in documentation and its working fine there. But from java with swt
library I'm getting the same
On 4/25/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Yes, that's the reason for the a: modifier. And yes, why are they
read-only?VimScript isn't a functionaly programming language.
Variables are mutable; arguments should be to.
Why?
Vim is a good programming
On 4/25/07, Robert Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
The only question that is really relevant here is: why it isn't enough
with having an ECMAScript extension instead of having it replace
VimScript?
The following arguments have been given:
1. Because people wouldn't
On 4/24/07, Bob Hiestand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/23/07, Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached patch very simply implements the following from the todo:
Wait! I have a comment! Isn't this todo just a subset of
6 Add :cdprev: go back to the previous directory. Need
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:10:20 -0500
Robert Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/23/07, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wish: allow a: in the function definition line:
function foo(a:line1, a:line2)
This is currently not allowed. But it seems logical to
So that the name is consistent everywhere. Makes it much easier to search. I
would appreciate this addition, too.
Example
function! Test(param)
echo a:param
endfunction
When you see param and want to know where it is used, all you have to do is
pressing * (using set hlsearch or a plugin
So maybe one could make vimscript search a variable foo as l:foo, a:foo,
(maybe also: w:foo, b:foo), s:foo, g:foo, and then throw an undefined
variable name error if none exists. Or so.
No. I don't want to go back to VB without using Option Explicit ;)
Don't let vim find some value
On 4/25/07, Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not at all. This patch merely exposes some information about the
current cd/lcd functionality. It does not provide new directory
changing stack capability.
You misunderstand. Isn't the functionality requested in your todo
entry just a
I uploaded GetVar a long long time ago to vim.sf.net (initially in 2002,
updated for Vim 7 in 2006) that basically is called with the name of a
variable and an optional default value. It checks w:, b:, t:, and
finally g: before returning the specified default value (default default
value is -1).
On 4/25/07, Bob Hiestand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/25/07, Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not at all. This patch merely exposes some information about the
current cd/lcd functionality. It does not provide new directory
changing stack capability.
You misunderstand. Isn't
I am sending you the code that I wrote to start a ole window.The
following code tries to start the application in a separate window. (
To run this code as an application we need to have swt library )
import org.eclipse.swt.SWT;
import org.eclipse.swt.layout.FillLayout;
import
Hi, all.
I have a patch to add SpiderMonkey interface to Vim. This is not well
tested and have only few features. But someone is interested in this.
(This is not proposal to add SpiderMonkey interface to Vim)
http://yukihiro.nakadaira.googlepages.com/if_spidermonkey.diff
Usage: (On Windows)
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I mean, seriously, it's a lot more intuitive to write
Vim.options['formatoptions'] =
Vim.options['formatoptions'].replace('t',
)
On 4/25/07, Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I guess then I don't understand your todo entry and Yakov's need for it.
I should clarify, it is my need, and I have no idea who added the
todo. I found it while trying to discern if the functionality I
needed was provided already.
17 matches
Mail list logo
