>
> Allowing duplicate entries is not that difficult. Perhaps adding an
> item to the dictionary for this is sufficient. Let's use "dup" for
> that.
>
Just tested this with the latest snapshot... works like a champ.
thanks for the quick turn around.
--
eric
> The completion stuff already is very complicated. Adding fancy things
> is going to take lots of time and introduce new bugs.
>
> Allowing duplicate entries is not that difficult. Perhaps adding an
> item to the dictionary for this is sufficient. Let's use "dup" for
> that.
>
I would assume t
Eric van Dewoestine wrote:
> Have you spent any more time considering this? I really feel that it
> is important to provide the flexibility to the plugin developers to
> display completion result as they see fit. In my case I want to be
> able to pass this flexibility on to the users so that th
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Since we are talking about completion, there is only one word to be
completed "toLowerCase". That it can have different arguments doesn't
matter for inserting "toLowerCase". You could have a function name ten
times and need to type CTRL-N ten times to get to another word.
Bram,
Have you spent any more time considering this? I really feel that it
is important to provide the flexibility to the plugin developers to
display completion result as they see fit. In my case I want to be
able to pass this flexibility on to the users so that they can decide
which model THEY
On 4/21/06, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eric Van wrote:
>
> > It appears that code completion is removing any entries that have
> > duplicate 'word' attributes.
> >
> > For completion results not using the dictionary format I fully agree
> > that duplicates can safely be removed,
Eric Van wrote:
> It appears that code completion is removing any entries that have
> duplicate 'word' attributes.
>
> For completion results not using the dictionary format I fully agree
> that duplicates can safely be removed, but when using the dictionary
> format two or more entries sharing
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:52:44PM -0700, Eric Van wrote:
> My code completion function returns a list with the following entries:
> kind: 'f', word: 'toCharArray', menu: 'toCharArray() char[] - String'
> kind: 'f', word: 'toString', menu: 'toString() String - String'
> kind: 'f', w
It appears that code completion is removing any entries that have
duplicate 'word' attributes.
For completion results not using the dictionary format I fully agree
that duplicates can safely be removed, but when using the dictionary
format two or more entries sharing the same 'word' attribute shou
